Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]What few reviews I have seen done by None Pro Critics...aka Interweb Hacks... and it was what I pretty much thought. One pretty much summed it, up. Said the movie was Pretty and had an Awesome Soundtrack. Story and Actors were Ok to Solid.. [/B]
so you talking about yourself
hahahahahaha
anyways, i keep saying it.. nobody gives a f*ck about what rotten tomatoes says expcet those that cannot make up their own minds... this film was tracking to an opening weekend figure of $44 to $46 milion and now like so many other films has to look towards the overseas market to make money..
this is only going to make $32 milion opening weekend unles it crawls to $40 milion... so so much for what idiotic critics are saying... I keep saying it.. You and you alone must decide on whether or not to go see a movie...
I guess this worries me. I see a lot of people who, when they speak about positive things in this movie, tend to just talk about how "beautiful" it is. Yeah, the visuals of a film are just one element. The plot, the characters, the acting are all just as important if not more important.
So it alarms me that most of the compliments are about the visuals.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
And it's damn good that it alarms you.It's true. Visually, the movie is excellent. And... that's it.
and that's my biggest concern with this movie...
it will look amazing but other than that.... it will be long and boring. i thought arrival was boring af 😬
i think i'll wait to see this for free....
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]If I "don't exist" then that would mean you like to argue with
yourself? [/B]
your a loser and a SJW ....
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Ghost in the Shell was better.Yes, I said it.
👆
Originally posted by Surtur
So either the theories that Deckard is a replicant were wrong or he is the shittiest replicant ever created.Does Edward James Olmos' character show up?
yes
Spoiler:
he tells gosling to go look for Deckard