Blade Runner 2049

Started by Patient_Leech9 pages

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Ghost in the Shell was better.

Yes, I said it.

I liked Ghost in the Shell. I thought it was unfairly ridiculed.

And yeah, I share the same concern as most people here with this film, that it will look great but be slow and boring.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I liked Ghost in the Shell. I thought it was unfairly ridiculed.

Same.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
And yeah, I share the same concern as most people here with this film, that it will look great but be slow and boring.

Yes, the film had a slow pace. While I wouldn't call it "boring", you still need to sit on your ass for 160 minutes and that's not including the ads/trailers that are shown before the film starts.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Yes, the film had a slow pace. While I wouldn't call it "boring", you still need to sit on your ass for 160 minutes...

Jesus, I didn't realize it was that long. That's long as fu#k.

The movie was influenced by the MCU

http://screenrant.com/blade-runner-2049-sequel-plans-marvel-influence/

^ Isn't everything nowadays?

It was about 10,000 times better than anything Marvel has ever done so I doubt it. Franchises and sequel hooks existed before the MCU, you know.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Isn't everything nowadays?

Except others go about it the wrong way DCEU & the recent Dark Universe

gotta make sure that first movie is actually good.

I really enjoyed this movie.

They seem to indicate that there is more happening in this new film than in the original. So that's good. Especially since the film is nearly 3 hours long...

YouTube video

It's nearly three hours but it never felt boring to me. Even when it's slowly building up to something it doesn't get tedious because every shot is so beautiful that it could be a desktop wallpaper.

Caught it yesterday, was good. Felt a little too artsy at times with the long almost stills and glaring monotone-like music blaring, though the original had this too, but more subdued.. But it's good, defo worth the watch on the big screen, imo.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They seem to indicate that there is more happening in this new film than in the original. So that's good. Especially since the film is nearly 3 hours long...

YouTube video

do they explain why this is boring at times?? do they explain why this is a flop and will need the overseas market to try and make some money

Do they explain how Rogue One was also Boring most of the time but somehow managed to NOT Bomb? Both in the U.S and overseas?

Originally posted by Psychotron
It's nearly three hours but it never felt boring to me. Even when it's slowly building up to something it doesn't get tedious because every shot is so beautiful that it could be a desktop wallpaper.
Originally posted by Robtard
Caught it yesterday, was good. Felt a little too artsy at times with the long almost stills and glaring monotone-like music blaring, though the original had this too, but more subdued.. But it's good, defo worth the watch on the big screen, imo.

Damn, you two tempt me.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
do they explain why this is boring at times?? do they explain why this is a flop and will need the overseas market to try and make some money

I dunno. I only watched the first 10 minutes. My first thought would be that it didn't have quite as big of a cult following as the execs may have thought/hoped it did. For every person who thinks the original film is a sci-fi classic masterpiece there are at least 1 or 2 others who find it boring. So I bet that has something to do with it. Plus it doesn't have dinosaurs or lightsabers and wookies, so the nostalgia factor is out.. lol. Robots are too much of an intellectual enterprise. So I never would have seen this having big mainstream appeal.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Damn, you two tempt me.

I dunno. I only watched the first 10 minutes. My first thought would be that it didn't have quite as big of a cult following as the execs may have thought/hoped it did. For every person who thinks the original film is a sci-fi classic masterpiece there are at least 1 or 2 others who find it boring. So I bet that has something to do with it. Plus it doesn't have dinosaurs or lightsabers and wookies, so the nostalgia factor is out.. lol. Robots are too much of an intellectual enterprise. So I never would have seen this having big mainstream appeal.

perhaps your are right..

this is a total disaster. not expected to turn a profit..

http://deadline.com/2017/10/blade-runner-2049-ryan-gosling-box-office-bomb-1202184297/

Not sure why folks are trying to make out the movie is a flop is such a bad thing, The first movie was also a flop too when it was released back in '82'.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
perhaps your are right..

this is a total disaster. not expected to turn a profit..

http://deadline.com/2017/10/blade-runner-2049-ryan-gosling-box-office-bomb-1202184297/

Good. I don't want Blade Runner to turn into the next Alien or Terminator franchise where the shit movies outnumber the good ones. BR2049 is a good ending the series.

Brave film making. Totally at odds with the modern blockbuster. The snail's pace editing and large chunks of sheer dark cinematography make it as bleak a dystopian movie as there's ever been. But by God it is an audio-visual masterpiece. It tackles big questions and themes with far more subtlety than Interstellar did. It's arguably far more relevant now than the original was as we move into an era of true artificial intelligence.

The fact that it'll flop disastrously doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Mass audiences don't have the attention spans to watch a 3 hour long movie unless it has lots of jokes and/or explosions.

It does make me wonder what's next for Denis Villeneuve.

^ Well, goddamn. I'm hearing such good things about this, I'm gonna try to get out and see it this weekend.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
^ Well, goddamn. I'm hearing such good things about this, I'm gonna try to get out and see it this weekend.

always remember just because critics love something doesn't mean you or I will