Freedon Nadd vs Exar Kun

Started by Jmanghan3 pages

Freedon Nadd vs Exar Kun

1. Sabers

2. Force

3. All-Out

Nadd dies. Kun is canonically his better.

Making matches that have already been answered by the official sources is stupid.

what a dumass

Originally posted by Azronger
Makes matches that have already been answered by the official sources is stupid.

We know shit of Freedon Nadd.

Except that he's below Kun. 😉

I mean physical Freedon Nads version.

Of course that he is below Exar Kun since he was just a weakling Sith spirit.

Originally posted by Freedon Nadd
I mean physical Freedon Nads version.

Physical Freddon is below Kun as well, lol.

👆

Kun. Even going by just the comics Ragnos considered Kun a worthy successor to the Sith and not Sadow nor Nadd.

Kun was the most powerful Dark Lord ever up to his time. That includes Nadd, Sadow, Ragnos, Hord, Pall etc, all in their living primes. That also includes Vitiate as of Kun's era.

Originally posted by The Merchant
Kun. Even going by just the comics Ragnos considered Kun a worthy successor to the Sith and not Sadow nor Nadd.

Sadow? Okay.
But, Nadd?
He was apprenticed under Naga Sadow, not Ragnos. And didn't Ragnos come to bestow Exar Kun as a Dark Lord when the bracelet amulets were joined?
And even Naga Sadow is a Sith Lord. So, I don't see the connection?
What is the Brotherhood of Lucasness doing on Epic Battles? Still in conflict?

Originally posted by SunRazer
Kun was the most powerful Dark Lord ever up to his time. That includes Nadd, Sadow, Ragnos, Hord, Pall etc, all in their living primes. That also includes Vitiate as of Kun's era.

You mean this(?):
"Once the most powerful and dangerous of the Dark Lords of the Sith, he [Exar Kun] was responsible for the deaths of millions four millennia before the rise of the Empire."
- The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia
How could be that true? When Vitiate(post-Nathema) was during Exar Kun's times?
Didn't he absorb an entire world's power which in turn>Exar Kun?

Arguably. Some say Vitiate's own quote retconned Kun's, others say Vitiate simply hadn't surpassed him until later.

EDIT: Of course, now that I think about it, Vitiate was never technically named DLOTS either. Those ancient folks weren't a big fan of his.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Kun was the most powerful Dark Lord ever up to his time. That includes Nadd, Sadow, Ragnos, Hord, Pall etc, all in their living primes. That also includes Vitiate as of Kun's era.

You mean this(?):
"Once the most powerful and dangerous of the Dark Lords of the Sith, he [Exar Kun] was responsible for the deaths of millions four millennia before the rise of the Empire."
- The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia

It could simply make reference to Exar Kun's military power and the effects he had over the galaxy(not some DBZ statement like in Sidious' or others' case) and about his brutal Sith campaigns against the Jedi and the Republic. First it(the source above) gives you the statement; then it brings proof to support the statement.
As for Vitiate:
How could be that true? When Vitiate(post-Nathema) was during Exar Kun's times?
Didn't he absorb an entire world's power which in turn>Exar Kun? 💃

fvckingdoublepostfagget

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Arguably. Some say Vitiate's own quote retconned Kun's, others say Vitiate simply hadn't surpassed him until later.

EDIT: Of course, now that I think about it, Vitiate was never technically named DLOTS either. Those ancient folks weren't a big fan of his.


1. Vitiate didn't surpass even if he ate a whole world? lol
Wonder how is that possible?
2. Ragnos chose Vitiate, though. But Gnost-Dural says,
"The fact that the spirits supported Exar Kun--suggest--they did not. And *perhaps* do not, support the Emperor we face today."

Originally posted by NewGuy01
fvckingdoublepostfagget

Crap. I know. By mistake.