Beniboybling
Worst Member
@Ares 👆
Originally posted by Nephthys
I think its fundamentally flawed to assume the master-of-all would have a lesser degree of skill than the master-of-one. Surely you'd need to put in as much or more time, effort and talent mastering all the forms as you would in mastering all aspects of just one.
That's not what I said lol. But the fact is that if we have a 9 in one style go up against a 6 in seven, the latter will lose every time, because their skill level is insufficient, that's just simple logic.
On the other hand if that 6 were to become a 10, in all seven styles, then of course they would beat the specialist, but that is a lot harder to achieve, hence why specialising is the smarter move.
Its no different from how you'd approach a skill tree in an RPG, if you spread your skills out between multiple trees yes you'll be versatile, but won't excel in anything, and get trashed by someone who does.