Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT to?
Originally posted by queeqHere are some prequels I liked a lot (proving you wrong, dadudemon!):
Monsters University
Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Bit of mistake here for Monsters university, Monsters Inc Sully tells mike that he's been jealous of his good looks since 4th grade, bit of a continuity error there
Is Rise of the planet of the apes really a prequel? Thought it was more part of a reboot
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT to?
Originally posted by steverules_2
Bit of mistake here for Monsters university, Monsters Inc Sully tells mike that he's been jealous of his good looks since 4th grade, bit of a continuity error thereIs Rise of the planet of the apes really a prequel? Thought it was more part of a reboot
So continuity errors made Monsters University less enjoyable? All the SW PT have serious, really serious continuity errors. But the PT lovers don't like us mentioning them.
And Rise... technically it is a prequel. So is Dawn and War... they all predate the original POTA chronologically and its sequels. So yes, it certainly IS a prequel series. And in doing so it is also a reboot. In that way it's identical to the SW PT: a prequel series. Except the new POTA movies actually make sense and are damn good (so far).
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT
Originally posted by queeq
So continuity errors made Monsters University less enjoyable? All the SW PT have serious, really serious continuity errors. But the PT lovers don't like us mentioning them.And Rise... technically it is a prequel. So is Dawn and War... they all predate the original POTA chronologically and its sequels. So yes, it certainly IS a prequel series. And in doing so it is also a reboot. In that way it's identical to the SW PT: a prequel series. Except the new POTA movies actually make sense and are damn good (so far).
Never said it made it less enjoyable. I enjoyed monsters university. And yes the Star wars PT did have plenty of continuity errors but I didn't wanna state the obvious.
Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT to?
Originally posted by queeq
Oooh... getting personal again.
It was a compliment.
I mean, really? Seriously.
😐
Stop looking for reasons to argue. This thread is a trigger topic for both you and me, obviously. 😉
Originally posted by queeq
Here are some prequels I liked a lot (proving you wrong, dadudemon!):
I don't remember posting that you hate all prequels, only that you hate prequels of all kinds.
Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT to?
Originally posted by Robtard
Having said that, there are some people who do the opposite, they'll praise the newer films; yet smash the OT for the same factors they've enjoyed the newer films for. Granted, these people are few compared to the PT/Newer film bashers, but they do exist.
I have never seen this person. Unless you're talking about Quanchi?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT
Originally posted by queeq
So continuity errors made Monsters University less enjoyable? All the SW PT have serious, really serious continuity errors. But the PT lovers don't like us mentioning them.And Rise... technically it is a prequel. So is Dawn and War... they all predate the original POTA chronologically and its sequels. So yes, it certainly IS a prequel series. And in doing so it is also a reboot. In that way it's identical to the SW PT: a prequel series. Except the new POTA movies actually make sense and are damn good (so far).
Well...no...it is a reboot. It is pretty good, though.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold the PT
Originally posted by queeq
And Rise... technically it is a prequel. So is Dawn and War... they all predate the original POTA chronologically and its sequels. So yes, it certainly IS a prequel series. And in doing so it is also a reboot. In that way it's identical to the SW PT: a prequel series. Except the new POTA movies actually make sense and are damn good (so far).
Yep, Even the Icarus ship which Charlton Heston character was on in POTA. Got a mention in Rise of the Planet of the Apes It got launched.
The OT are legitimately better films. All the negatives people say the OT shares with the PT, however valid, miss the point that the OT has far less of them.
The OT has largely better acting. Better scripts. Better direction. Better pacing. The only thing it really lacks behind on is effects, imo.
The PT does have good to it, but the OT still holds up today far better than the PT will in 10-20 years imo.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why does the Star Wars OT slide on so many of the same issues people hold th
Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...no...it is a reboot. It is pretty good, though.
They are as much prequels as the SW PT is. These new movies tell us how the apes came to ruling the planet. The original POTA starts when a couple of astronauts land in earth in the far future.
You can argue it any way you want, but the new Apes movies ARE prequels. And as a series of prequels, they are also a reboot. Just like the SW PT was (as it turned out).
Originally posted by Igniz
The PT wasn't that bad but I have to admit they're not as good as the OT. For me, Revenge Of The Sith was the best in the PT since it connected to Episode 4 of the OT.
Despite the fact that even ROTS failed on the main plot points i.e. Anakin's fall to the Dark Side, which was utterly ridiculous?