UC Berkeley riots

Rob, I miss the smell of your beautiful skin

Originally posted by Deadline
^ It's ok don't respond to the points made, just make a silly statment. Typical leftist (or maybe you're not one, but it's what you would expect).

Originally posted by NemeBro
Why would anyone respond to what you wrote when you were too lazy to try to prove it?

He's quite busy. He has a deadline to meet.

Originally posted by dadudemon
He's quite busy. He has a deadline to meet.

YouTube video

Damn, look at that internalized racism.

That Asian probably hates himself. Most likely goes into a fit whenever he sees chopsticks and has to be restrained.

I got through about 25-30 seconds before I had to turn it off, what a whiny little b*tch boy. He needs to man-up first before he tries to make his points. Have his balls even dropped yet? Mildly disgusted.

edit: Surtur, try to be less racist, it's Friday.

So something interesting..I guess a bill called the "Milo Bill" is being put forth in order to prevent stuff like this from happening again.

Except..it's being put forth in Tennessee lol.

Which is ridiculous, as free speak is protected already. As noted, Berkeley cancelled due to safety concerns after a 150 odd anarchist started a riot.

Yeah, and it seems it is quite vague with talking about how it's meant to give students a chance to essentially be exposed to different kinds of speakers.

Apparently the guy trying to do it..tried something similar in the past and it got shot down because apparently under the bill you could technically have ISIS recruiters being allowed to speak. Or that was the reason given.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah, and it seems it is quite vague with talking about how it's meant to give students a chance to essentially be exposed to different kinds of speakers.

Apparently the guy trying to do it..tried something similar in the past and it got shot down because apparently under the bill you could technically have ISIS recruiters being allowed to speak. Or that was the reason given.

People crying about "free speech" on colleges would be against having a pro-ISIS speaker speak at colleges.

I'm sure you see the problem there?

Originally posted by Robtard
People crying about "free speech" on colleges would be against having a pro-ISIS speaker speak at colleges.

I'm sure you see the problem there?

I see the problem, but I have said if someone is actively going to incite or encourage violence they shouldn't be allowed. A person who says they endorse ISIS would essentially be endorsing the groups practices, which encourage violence.

If they were to make this bill, I'd have it worded more specifically to talk about speech that isn't from someone who's views encourage violence against those who disagree with them(ISIS certainly does I feel you'd agree).

209 rioters are indicted on charges including felony rioting which includes $25,000 in fines and up to 10 years in prison. Most of the rioters are college students. I wonder how nervous they all are. Federal charges by the way.

These are the riots that happened in D.C. The day of the inauguration. Now they're going after uc Berkeley rioters. What a win for justice and order!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13334/over-200-inauguration-day-rioters-indicted-robert-kraychik

Bonus:

Were it me for this case..part of me does want prison but 10 years? Eh, what I'd do is hit them where it will hurt, which is those 25k in fines.

Originally posted by vansonbee
209 rioters are indicted on charges including felony rioting which includes $25,000 in fines and up to 10 years in prison. Most of the rioters are college students. I wonder how nervous they all are. Federal charges by the way.

These are the riots that happened in D.C. The day of the inauguration. Now they're going after uc Berkeley rioters. What a win for justice and order!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13334/over-200-inauguration-day-rioters-indicted-robert-kraychik

Bonus:

All this proves is that you should only protest/riot in Califunny. They don't arrest you in that state when you destroy stuff and hurt people.

Originally posted by Surtur
Were it me for this case..part of me does want prison but 10 years? Eh, what I'd do is hit them where it will hurt, which is those 25k in fines.

Originally posted by vansonbee
Well, its going to be stuck on their permanent record, good luck with finding a proper job!

Like had any hope of doing that before...

Originally posted by vansonbee
209 rioters are indicted on charges including felony rioting which includes $25,000 in fines and up to 10 years in prison. Most of the rioters are college students. I wonder how nervous they all are. Federal charges by the way.

These are the riots that happened in D.C. The day of the inauguration. Now they're going after uc Berkeley rioters. What a win for justice and order!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13334/over-200-inauguration-day-rioters-indicted-robert-kraychik

So do you think this is right or wrong?

Should rioting result in arrests for provable cases (article says body cams and still photos are what lead to solid cases and indictments....I mean...if you're caught on camera smashing a window, you should pay a fine to the city and to the owner of the building, imo).

Originally posted by vansonbee
209 rioters are indicted on charges including felony rioting which includes $25,000 in fines and up to 10 years in prison. Most of the rioters are college students. I wonder how nervous they all are. Federal charges by the way.

These are the riots that happened in D.C. The day of the inauguration. Now they're going after uc Berkeley rioters. What a win for justice and order!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13334/over-200-inauguration-day-rioters-indicted-robert-kraychik

Bonus:

That shit was a belly laugh read.