UC Berkeley riots

Started by Robtard27 pages

SquallX, if you believe that's authentic, I have a bridge to sell you, really cheap and it's a great investment. Anyhow.

Ten years for breaking windows seems rather heavy, like draconian levels heavy. DDM is correct on this, should be a light sentence and fine, reparations ideally paid to owner of the damaged property at cost, plus loss of business etc.

But this is Trump's America now, so not surprised. Don't cry when he comes after your guns 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
So do you think this is right or wrong?

Should rioting result in arrests for provable cases (article says body cams and still photos are what lead to solid cases and indictments....I mean...if you're caught on camera smashing a window, you should pay a fine to the city and to the owner of the building, imo).

I'd be disturbed at anyone who feels people rioting shouldn't be arrested lol, even it's just that they pay a fine. The exact punishment they should receive is probably debatable, but it's hard to imagine anyone but people like The Young Turks to actually think this kind of behavior is okay.

Now when you have people setting vehicles or places on fire? No, that's jail time. Arson should net you a couple years minimum.

Originally posted by Robtard
SquallX, if you believe that's authentic, I have a bridge to sell you, really cheap and it's a great investment. Anyhow.

Ten years for breaking windows seems rather heavy, like draconian levels heavy. DDM is correct on this, should be a light sentence and fine, reparations ideally paid to owner of the damaged property at cost, plus loss of business etc.

But this is Trump's America now, so not surprised. Don't cry when he comes after your guns 🙂

Stop being a ****ing retard!

Those rioters are ****ing adults, if you as rioter takes it upon yourself to break and damages other peoples livelihood just because you don't like a person, then you should take it upon yourself to take the punishments and not *****.

Harsh punishment is needed when anyone acts like degenerates.

Originally posted by SquallX
Stop being a ****ing retard!

Those rioters are ****ing adults, if you as rioter takes it upon yourself to break and damages other peoples livelihood just because you don't like a person, then you should take it upon yourself to take the punishments and not *****.

Harsh punishment is needed when anyone acts like degenerates.

^
Look at this guy lose his shit. How embarrassing for him.

Originally posted by Robtard
^
Look at this guy lose his shit. How embarrassing for him.

It's embarrassing seeing anyone defend these lawless ****ers.

Originally posted by SquallX
It's embarrassing seeing anyone defend these lawless ****ers.

No one defended the rioters, you either knee-jerked due to being emotionally unstable or your reading comprehension is poor.

Originally posted by SquallX
Stop being a ****ing retard!

Those rioters are ****ing adults, if you as rioter takes it upon yourself to break and damages other peoples livelihood just because you don't like a person, then you should take it upon yourself to take the punishments and not *****.

Harsh punishment is needed when anyone acts like degenerates.

Hey dude, you seem upset. Robtard never once advocated for them to have a free pass. He did think 10 years in prison was ridiculous. I agree.

I think they should pay for the damages plus a punitive damages fine that is paid to the city. No jail time.

There a such thing as felony vandalism.

http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/Vandalism.htm

So, yeah, calm down, take a breather. Get away from all of this news, forums, Facebook, etc. Put it all away. Go have yourself some delicious BBQ. Just let all of this political bullshit go for a while. Once you feel back in control of how upset this stuff makes you, come to us. I know I enjoy some of your posts.

Agreed with Rob and DDM, no need to jail time for busted property. For attacking people, though, yes, definitely jail time is needed.

I think some jail for vandalism is sound, just 10 years for breaking windows is ludicrous. Have the time fit the crime, breaking windows maybe a few days, lighting a car on fire, maybe a few months to a year (or whatever is a bit more than car theft) etc.

If someone honestly thinks these property damage rioters need 10 years in prison, they should probably move to Iran or N. Korea, they'll be happier there.

Originally posted by Robtard
I think some jail for vandalism is sound, just 10 years for breaking windows is ludicrous. Have the time fit the crime, breaking windows maybe a few days, lighting a car on fire, maybe a few months to a year (or whatever is a bit more than car theft) etc.

If someone honestly thinks these property damage rioters need 10 years in prison, they should probably move to Iran or N. Korea, they'll be happier there.

The link I posted said some states have up to 1 year for felony vandalism. If you lite a car on fire, yeah, should be a hefty fine.

Originally posted by dadudemon
The link I posted said some states have up to 1 year for felony vandalism. If you lite a car on fire, yeah, should be a hefty fine.

How is purposely lighting a car on fire not arson? I'm pretty sure that comes with more than a hefty fine.

Also we've had places of business set on fire too before. I think the dude who set fire to a pharmacy during the Baltimore riots got at least a couple years.

Originally posted by SquallX
Stop being a ****ing retard!

Those rioters are ****ing adults, if you as rioter takes it upon yourself to break and damages other peoples livelihood just because you don't like a person, then you should take it upon yourself to take the punishments and not *****.

Harsh punishment is needed when anyone acts like degenerates.

10 years is phucking retarded. Deal with it.

As unreasonable/retarded as 10 years is for breaking windows and stuff (although doesn't felony rioting also cover assault/arson/looting?). I cannot help but chuckle after reading the antifa's (if that is really sincerely an antifa's reaction as I tend to maintain a healthy skepticism on everything I read online) reaction to it.

Doesn't matter if you are left or right leaning. Anarchists like these are a nuisance to everyone. Anarchists who destroy personal property and turn peaceful protests violent for the lols (or as they so put it: for "right wing tears"😉 certainly deserves none of my sympathy.

So in the words of the immortal Nelson:

Who's getting upset. I just find it insulting that were now defending a bunch of Neanderthals that does nothing but riots, arson break other peoples property and claims it's being done because there oppress.

What i find insulting, it's okay as adults to do the crime, but when it comes to receiving the punishment for our misdeeds, suddenly there to be treated like children who's toys there parents took away.

What i find insulting, is those idiots screaming oppression, yet when King protested, when there was true oppression, riots were not part of it. It was always peaceful.

It's funny were saying 10 yrs is too harsh of a sentence, but i bet all of you would change you're tune in a second if it were you that was being beaten in the street, it was you're businesses windows that were smashed, it was you're car that allowed you to go to and from work.

I've seen true oppression, and it's not in this country. So yes, those idiots deserves everything they receive.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I cannot help but chuckle after reading the antifa's (if that is really sincerely an antifa's reaction as I tend to maintain a healthy skepticism on everything I read online) reaction to it.

Their reaction to what the 10 year thing? What was their reaction?

I genuinely worry about the future of the 1st amendment with the Regressive left. The Left has forgotten that the ACLU has fough to represent Nazis in Skoki Illinois, how backward do these idiots have to be to have forgotten their own history?

Originally posted by carthage
I genuinely worry about the future of the 1st amendment with the Regressive left. The Left has forgotten that the ACLU has fough to represent Nazis in Skoki Illinois, how backward do these idiots have to be to have forgotten their own history?

Lol yep and someone from the ACLU defended Milo and you can guess how some reacted to that...reasonably!

Ha no.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Why would anyone respond to what you wrote when you were too lazy to try to prove it?

Yea to be fair I hadn't provided any proof yet, but I kinda got the impression it wouldn't matter anyway. Anyway here is some information on abortion and race.

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_race/

Lest you feel these claims are an exaggeration, consider the numbers. According to 2010 census data, African Americans make up 12.6% of the U.S. population2 but the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that black women accounted for 35.4% of all abortions in 2009.3 The Guttmacher Institute (AGI) puts the percentage of black abortions at 30% of the U.S. total.4

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/nov/25/cynthia-meyer/cynthia-meyer-says-more-black-babies-are-aborted-n/

According to the report, in 2013 black women accounted for 29,007 terminated pregnancies, representing almost 42 percent of all abortions in the city. That same year, black women in the city gave birth to 24,108 babies. With abortions surpassing live births by nearly 5,000, African American women in the city clearly terminated pregnancies more often than they carried babies to term. Black women terminated pregnancies at a rate of 67.3 per 1,000 women ages 15 to 49, a rate far higher than any other racial or ethnic group.

Oh and here's research showing that abortion clinics target minority areas.

http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdf

This is information on more black babies being aborted than born
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/nyc-more-black-babies-killed-abortion-born

The data on black abortions and birth should be on page 6 of this pdf.
http://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Pregnancy%20Outcomes%20%20NYC%20Health%202012.pdf

Sorry don't have anything on Margaret Sanger but it's the democrats and libs who push this abortion thing and when Hillary Clinton comes out describes black children as predators (explaining how she really feels about blacks) and goes on television and boasts about how she killed Gaddaffi I believe she wants to exterminate blacks she's just not telling people how she really feels.

Some people are duped by liberals but the liberals pushing the agenda are racist and psychotic. In all fairness they hate everyone but I think they do hate blacks more than whites.

Originally posted by Deadline
Yea to be fair I hadn't provided any proof yet, but I kinda got the impression it wouldn't matter anyway. Anyway here is some information on abortion and race.

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_race/

Lest you feel these claims are an exaggeration, consider the numbers. According to 2010 census data, African Americans make up 12.6% of the U.S. population2 but the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that black women accounted for 35.4% of all abortions in 2009.3 The Guttmacher Institute (AGI) puts the percentage of black abortions at 30% of the U.S. total.4

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/nov/25/cynthia-meyer/cynthia-meyer-says-more-black-babies-are-aborted-n/

According to the report, in 2013 black women accounted for 29,007 terminated pregnancies, representing almost 42 percent of all abortions in the city. That same year, black women in the city gave birth to 24,108 babies. With abortions surpassing live births by nearly 5,000, African American women in the city clearly terminated pregnancies more often than they carried babies to term. Black women terminated pregnancies at a rate of 67.3 per 1,000 women ages 15 to 49, a rate far higher than any other racial or ethnic group.

Oh and here's research showing that abortion clinics target minority areas.

http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdf

This is information on more black babies being aborted than born
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/nyc-more-black-babies-killed-abortion-born

The data on black abortions and birth should be on page 6 of this pdf.
http://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Pregnancy%20Outcomes%20%20NYC%20Health%202012.pdf

Sorry don't have anything on Margaret Sanger but it's the democrats and libs who push this abortion thing and when Hillary Clinton comes out describes black children as predators (explaining how she really feels about blacks) and goes on television and boasts about how she killed Gaddaffi I believe she wants to exterminate blacks she's just not telling people how she really feels.

Some people are duped by liberals but the liberals pushing the agenda are racist and psychotic. In all fairness they hate everyone but I think they do hate blacks more than whites.

This is a very good point and it is a point that American Liberals do not want to talk about. IF they did, they would have to admit that they are subversively racist.

The black community is starting to become more and more aware of how American Liberals are actually racist and hide it with fake inclusivity and fake righteousness. While they are busy openly patting themselves on the back for the way they think and apologizing for bullshit things that they should not apologize for (because that’s what it means to be an American Liberal: apologize all the time for fake self-righteous things so people can see how virtuous you are).

So what is the racism I’m talking about that the black community is recognizing? Oh, that’s right: black genocide.

http://blackgenocide.org/home.html

Originally posted by Deadline
Yea to be fair I hadn't provided any proof yet, but I kinda got the impression it wouldn't matter anyway. Anyway here is some information on abortion and race.

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_race/

Lest you feel these claims are an exaggeration, consider the numbers. According to 2010 census data, African Americans make up 12.6% of the U.S. population2 but the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that black women accounted for 35.4% of all abortions in 2009.3 The Guttmacher Institute (AGI) puts the percentage of black abortions at 30% of the U.S. total.4

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/nov/25/cynthia-meyer/cynthia-meyer-says-more-black-babies-are-aborted-n/

According to the report, in 2013 black women accounted for 29,007 terminated pregnancies, representing almost 42 percent of all abortions in the city. That same year, black women in the city gave birth to 24,108 babies. With abortions surpassing live births by nearly 5,000, African American women in the city clearly terminated pregnancies more often than they carried babies to term. Black women terminated pregnancies at a rate of 67.3 per 1,000 women ages 15 to 49, a rate far higher than any other racial or ethnic group.

Oh and here's research showing that abortion clinics target minority areas.

http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdf

This is information on more black babies being aborted than born
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/nyc-more-black-babies-killed-abortion-born

The data on black abortions and birth should be on page 6 of this pdf.
http://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Pregnancy%20Outcomes%20%20NYC%20Health%202012.pdf

Sorry don't have anything on Margaret Sanger but it's the democrats and libs who push this abortion thing and when Hillary Clinton comes out describes black children as predators (explaining how she really feels about blacks) and goes on television and boasts about how she killed Gaddaffi I believe she wants to exterminate blacks she's just not telling people how she really feels.

Some people are duped by liberals but the liberals pushing the agenda are racist and psychotic. In all fairness they hate everyone but I think they do hate blacks more than whites.

Most women who seek abortion services are unemployed or underemployed, living at or below the federal poverty level, and already have one child, usually without the benefit of marriage.

These are women who are just treading water, and abortion is the difference between keeping their head above water, and drowning.

Financial hardship is what is leading them to seek abortion services, so it only makes sense to locate abortion facilities in economically depressed communities, to make it easier for these women to access abortion services.

That is not a racist conspiracy against black people.