UC Berkeley riots

Started by Flyattractor27 pages

That is a healthy sentiment.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]That is a healthy sentiment. [/B]

Well I don't really believe blacks need reparations The Left just need to stop messin with us, but if you want to raise the issue The Left should pay and not whites.

I would have no prob with that except that "The Left" never pays with its OWN MONEY!

Reparations for what?

Nobody alive in the US was a slave or a slaver, and if slavery hadn't existed the blacks over here would be worse off by being in Africa or some shit (definitely not that this means they owe us something or that slavery was a good thing).

The notion of reparations always struck me as retarded.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I can definitely say that no one in my family history was a slave owner. My heritage goes back to colonial days in the US.

My ancestors came to the US for...wait for it...religious freedom.

And as I've stated many times now, I had 2 male ancestors die in the Civil War, fighting on the side of the North.

So I have 0 white guilt. And 0 support for reparations.

One thing that is for some reason never ever discussed is that American Indians owned thousands of black slaves.

Seems Milo is in hot water for comments he's made that were apparently defending pedophilia. His upcoming speaking event with CPAC was cancelled (were are the cries for free speech now?) and Breitbart may let him go.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/02/20/breitbart-news-may-boot-milo-yiannopoulos-over-sex-comments.html

LoL, and you people saw him as your hero. Lolz. Are you even ashamed of yourselves?

Milo has been doing that for years iirc, he's disgusting as phuck.

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems Milo is in hot water for comments he's made that were apparently defending pedophilia. His upcoming speaking event with CPAC was cancelled (were are the cries for free speech now?) and Breitbart may let him go.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/02/20/breitbart-news-may-boot-milo-yiannopoulos-over-sex-comments.html

LoL, and you people saw him as your hero. Lolz. Are you even ashamed of yourselves?

Lmao, not ashamed at all. Milo is done, but it's all good because the damage has been done. More and more people are getting tired of the sjw type stuff he rallied against. Someone new will come along and take his place.

Doesn't mean I agree with pedophilia, that is wack jack.

Also, the reason there are no cries for free speech is because he was invited to speak and the people who invited him have every right to disinvite him. If he had spoken there and people had shown up to try to stop it from happening, that goes into free speech territory. But he isn't *owed* a platform by the CPAC.

I will note Trump is speaking at the CPAC lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lmao, not ashamed at all. Milo is done, but it's all good because the damage has been done. More and more people are getting tired of the sjw type stuff he rallied against. Someone new will come along and take his place.

Doesn't mean I agree with pedophilia, that is wack jack.

Also, the reason there are no cries for free speech is because he was invited to speak and the people who invited him have every right to disinvite him. If he had spoken there and people had shown up to try to stop it from happening, that goes into free speech territory. But he isn't *owed* a platform by the CPAC.

I will note Trump is speaking at the CPAC lol.

So you don't care that he's cool with childrape because he's done his damage against SJWs? How does that make sense to you? What if your new anti-SJW hero is another pedo?

Um, wouldn't that same thing then apply to Berkeley when you people assumed they cancelled to shut him up and it wasn't because of a safety issue due to riots? Why is he somehow "owed" a platform at Berkeley? Double standard?

Originally posted by Robtard
So you don't care that he's cool with childrape because he's done his damage against SJWs? How does that make sense to you? What if your new anti-SJW hero is another pedo?

I never said I don't care about his views, I said his being finished doesn't bother me.

Um, wouldn't that same thing then apply to Berkeley when you people assumed they cancelled to shut him up and it wasn't because of a safety issue due to riots? Why is he somehow "owed" a platform at Berkeley? Double standard?

Lol um they cancelled due to safety concerns cuz some people showed up and began burning shit and getting violent. So no, it's not the same thing as someone disinviting someone because they just don't want them there, as opposed to be cause outside forces prevent a danger.

I assumed the people protested it to shut him up, not that the cops or school feigned concern over safety in order to shut him up and cancel his performance.

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said I don't care about his views, I said his being finished doesn't bother me.

Lol um they cancelled due to safety concerns cuz some people showed up and began burning shit and getting violent. So no, it's not the same thing as someone disinviting someone because they just don't want them there, as opposed to be cause outside forces prevent a danger.

I assumed the people protested it to shut him up, not that people feigned concern over safety in order to shut him up and cancel his performance.

So you do care about Milo still? Lolz. Weird, dude.

Yeah, I pointed that out already back then and now. The initial cry-from-the-soapbox from you people was that Berkeley was suppressing free speech and "poor Milo" because of it, sport.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you do care about Milo still? Lolz. Weird, dude.

Like I said: I never said I don't care about his views. Let me get specific: I never said I don't care about his opinons on child rape.

Yeah, I pointed that out already back then and now. The initial cry-from-the-soapbox from you people was that Berkeley was suppressing free speech and "poor Milo", sport

Except again: we said it was the people protesting, mostly made up of students, that wanted to shut him down. Not that the school wanted to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv0JlJgAYNQ

Originally posted by Surtur
Like I said: I never said I don't care about his views. Let me get specific: I never said I don't care about his opinons on child rape.

Except again: we said it was the people protesting, mostly made up of students, that wanted to shut him down. Not that the school wanted to.

Make up your mind already, you're spinning and it's sad.

Now that you're moving the point again because you can't handle having your nose rubbed in your own hypocrisy, we already covered that too, sport. Freedom of speech also means that people have the right to tell someone else to shut up.

Originally posted by Robtard
Make up your mind already, you're spinning and it's sad.

Now that you're moving the point again because you can't handle having your nose rubbed in your own hypocrisy, we already covered that too, sport. Freedom of speech also means that people have the right to tell someone else to shut up.

Except it's not hypocrisy, in you in your hysterical excitement over the Milo story once again over reaching.

Every time you call someone else sad it just reflects on your own lack of self awareness.

Originally posted by Surtur
Except it's not hypocrisy, in you in your hysterical excitement over the Milo story once again over reaching.

Every time you call someone else sad it just reflects on your own lack of self awareness.

WTF? Your rage at having your own hypocrisy rubbed in your face is making you incoherent. Compose yourself and try again.

A "no you!", look at your try and shift the focus away from 'Freedom of Speech' (ie the topic) because you can't answer the hard questions again. Lolz.

Originally posted by Robtard
WTF? Your rage at having your own hypocrisy rubbed in your face is making you incoherent. Compose yourself and try again.

A "no you!", look at your try and shift the focus away from 'Freedom of Speech' (ie the topic) because you can't answer the hard questions again. Lolz.

Lmao, my rage? Holy shit dude, did this Milo thing trigger you that badly?

It's strange how he is supposedly my hero and yet you've vastly more emotionally affected it seems.

Go read your sentence again, it was an incoherent mess, you're obviously upset over this.

Another personal attack trying to shift focus away from the topic (Freedom of Speech) because your own hypocrisy is drowning you. Now claiming I've supported the pedo. Lolz.

Originally posted by Robtard
Go read your sentence again, it was an incoherent mess, you're obviously upset over this.

I see what triggered you now lol.

"in you in your hysterical excitement over the Milo story once again over reaching"

"In" was meant to be "it's". That's all, that is the big mystery there.

Another personal attack trying to shift focus away from the topic, Freedom of Speech. Now claiming I've supported the pedo. Lolz.

I don't know if you support him, I just see a high emotional reaction from you. You are acting hysterical and claiming people are enraged. I think you need to take a slow deep breathe and calm down. I get that you're excited over the Milo thing, but you gotta be safe.

Wow. Robbie is badmouthing a Gay man and Also Bad Mouthing Child Molesters. His insides must be in such turmoil right now.