Originally posted by Robtard
And there's that denial, sport.
Challenge accepted, show somebody here defending his actions.
Before you say it: no, pointing out the Salon thing wasn't saying it was okay, it was calling out hypocrisy.
Now that we have that covered, quote someone saying this type of stuff is okay.
Originally posted by Robtard
You Milo fans are a weird bunch; that much is evident.Berkeley/a so-called liberal institute cancels Milo event due to riots/safety concerns: "Liberals hate free speech!"
CPAC/conservatives cancels Milo because they're forced to finally admit he's a pederast: *silence*
Damn you're majorly triggered over this. You should be happy, not triggered. What gives?
Originally posted by SurturThen what was the point of 'pointing out hypocrisy' if not to belittle Milo's deranged statements?
Challenge accepted, show somebody here defending his actions.Before you say it: no, pointing out the Salon thing wasn't saying it was okay, it was calling out hypocrisy.
Now that we have that covered, quote someone saying this type of stuff is okay.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Then what was the point of 'pointing out hypocrisy' if not to belittle Milo's deranged statements?
To point out the hypocrisy, boom. No more, no less. Never said Milo can never be discussed, or any of the pearl clutching that went on.
Now did you have any further questions about my motivations? I would be happy to clear up any confusion you may have.