Originally posted by Deadline...And I provided evidence... From comic books, lol.
No it isn't anyone can make statements, this is a debate thread, in debate threads you provide evidence and elaborate. In fact I don't think you've provided evidence for anything in this thread. Poor debating. In fact prove that it's a well know fact then. What does Surfer have written on his chest 'I'm more powerful than I was in 1987'? facepalm
It is a fact that Surfer has been upgraded since he fought Runner almost 30 years ago, yes:
http://i.imgur.com/zrSOpuC.jpg
Not sure why you're getting so upset, throwing these faux-insults at me, and ignoring the VAST difference in his portrayals in the time since their battle..?
Originally posted by DeadlineLol, wow. Is it 'trolling' to bring up on panel evidence, and present it in an intelligible way? If so, I suppose I am guilty as charged. 👆
Stop trolling. No I don't need to provide proof because Runner being capped at sublight speed is complete nonsense because I know that you have read 100s of marvel comics and you know that Grunewalds statement of light being the fastest speed there is complete nonsense. No I'm not contradicting myself if you actually read what I said, anyone can pick up a marvel comic with a herald level character and see them moving faster than light, there are going to be lots of people who don't know Surfer is more powerful than he was in 1987. Even if he was, how much more powerful? Is he subskyfather level now? Absurd statement.
As I mentioned earlier: your opinion that Runner > Surfer hinges on a battle they had 30 years ago. It does not take into account Surfer's increases in power/speed since then. ie. Runner being superior to Surfer in 1987, certainly doesn't mean he still holds that advantage in 2017. It is overtly fallacious to assume otherwise.
...It's like me trying to say that Superman from Action Comics #1 = Superman from Action Comics #900. srsly