Who's faster: Palpatine or Yoda?

Started by Deronn_solo5 pages

The junior novel, lal.

I don't take Star Wars books written for 10 year olds all that serious.

Originally posted by Azronger
Well, obviously he didn't since he was holding back.
😕

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
The junior novel, lal.

I don't take Star Wars books written for 10 year olds all that serious.

You take SWTOR seriously 🙂

Originally posted by MythLord
Why would he hold back against the person who is responsible for the death of thousands of people Yoda knew since they were babies?

That makes absolutely no sense.

I don't know, nor do I need to.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
The junior novel, lal.

I don't take Star Wars books written for 10 year olds all that serious.

So you ignore canon, in other words.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
😕

I feel the same. But it happened:

An end, I must make. Yoda redoubled the speed of his blows. Palpatine parried one, then another — and then the red lightsaber spun out of his hands and over the edge. Yoda raised his weapon for the final blow.

@Zoltan:

your jokes about as shit as Kurk's.

the events of RotS has an entire movie and a far more legitimate adult novel to pull from that Lucas himself was involved with. why are we taking a book written strictly for kids that haven't hit puberty, over the movie and novel - both of which the God of the universe had involvement in?

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
@Zoltan:

your jokes about as shit as Kurk's.

the events of RotS has an entire movie and a far more legitimate adult novel to pull from that Lucas himself was involved with. why are we taking a book written strictly for kids that haven't hit puberty, over the movie and novel - both of which the God of the universe had involvement in?

Nobody is putting the junior novel above the movie or the adult novelization. However, Yoda disarming Sidious is still valid when there's nothing in the aforementioned sources contradicting it and has the official script by Lucas to support it.

It's a complementary source, you don't have to take it over anything. I was making a joke, don't take it as hard as your uncle's stick.

Originally posted by Azronger
However, Yoda disarming Sidious is still valid when there's nothing in the aforementioned sources contradicting it and has the official script by Lucas to support it.

Except the fact he wasn't disarmed in the actual movie or the official novel? Neither would miss such an important detail in a match that decided the fate of an entire galaxy.


It's a complementary source, you don't have to take it over anything.

That's what you're doing here - specifically AZ with the holding back bit, when RotS novel made it clear Yoda just couldn't beat Sidious, sabers or other wise.

I was making a joke

Yes, and I'm telling you it was a shit one. 🙂

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
That's what you're doing here - specifically AZ with the holding back bit, when RotS novel made it clear Yoda just couldn't beat Sidious, sabers or other wise.

Idk where you got this crap from, I didn't say anything of the sort.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Yes, and I'm telling you it was a shit one. 🙂

Nah, it was totally valid 🙂

Idk where you got this crap from, I didn't say anything of the sort.

fair enough.

Nah, it was totally valid

TFU fans shouldn't have opinions on quality. 🙂

TFU is a masterpiece compared to anything after vanilla swtor. Sad that this is the only thing you can come up with every time.

Coming from the same person who brings TOR into nearly everything involving me, when I don't even like the game, or most of it's characters?

****ing hilarious. And hypocritical.

By nearly everything you mean the first time when it was not relevant? Pathetic.

do I really have to track down every time you've brought it up? Much more often than I mentioned The Force Unleashed with you. To deny that is absolute laughable.

Key words: when not relevant. Of course I'm gona bring it up when you are drinking Vaylin's c-unt juice like it's kool aid.

nope, you've brought it up in completely non-relevant context as well.

Regardless, we're derailing Ant's thread, so I'm gonna cut it short by calling you both forgetful and a hypocrite. 🙂

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Except the fact he wasn't disarmed in the actual movie or the official novel? Neither would miss such an important detail in a match that decided the fate of an entire galaxy.

In the movie, it cuts to Obi-Wan and Vader in the middle of the duel. When it cuts back, Sidious has no saber. Coincidence? I think not. At the very least it's not a contradiction.

And just because it wasn't mentioned in the adult novelization doesn't mean it didn't happen, lol. The novel is very vague about the details of the fight, and instead has poetic stuff in its place.

There're two sources supporting the notion of Yoda disarming Sidious - one of which was written exclusively by Lucas and no one else - and no contradictions. It happened.