Originally posted by deathslash
it's not because of similar powersets. We know for a fact that omni-man was far more powerful and much faster than mark in their first fight. When they see each other again, mark cheapshots him and it still doesn't cause him to bleed (he just states that mark has gotten stronger). When the three viltrumites show up to take Nolan to jail, he escapes and catches up to the viltrumite that was just about to catch mark (mark had a massive head start at this point and this once again shows how much faster he is). During the viltrumite war, [B] omni-man had to pull mark in order for him to keep up . So basically, in the beginning of invincible, mark is capable of flying halfway around the world in just about 30 seconds and Nolan is far faster than him (since he managed to finish a fight and catch up to mark), mark gets much faster and stronger (to the point where he can kill conquest, casually lift 400 tons, and tank a planet blowing up behind him and Nolan is still faster than him, and after the viltrumite war, their stats are basically a wash. I'm not assigning Nolan feats based off of mark; rather I'm using mark's speed and strength and Nolan's obvious superiority in those department to paint a clear picture of how fast and strong he is. [/B]
You're still not getting it. I'm saying you can't use Invincibles feats when arguing for Omni-Man period. You initially brought up instances to show they are equal then backtracked to reference superiority. If you wanted to show how fast/strong etc Nolan is y not use HIS feats.