Originally posted by Philosophía
I think they wish to shy away from the 'brick with invulnerability' stuff, so as not to limit the type of fights they can put him in. I mean, if you give him 'true invulnerability' (oxymoron, but whatever), like Superman, Captain Marvel and whatnot, it would render villains like Black Manta redundant.It's kind of like Hulk can take Mjolnir head on, but can also be cut by Wolverine. It allows for a wider range of opponents to be fought. You can put Aquaman against Black Manta, Deathstroke, Catman [yes, I know] and at the same time against Wonder Woman, J'onn and whatnot, and still be able to write the fight properly in each case.
Makes for better stories, if not for better versus forum arguing.
I basically just differentiate between blunt and sharp attacks, since there's quite a bit of precedence in comics, and it's easier to debate.
Agreed. And tbh, if I think about it, I think it suits Aquaman better if he's one of those "you can hurt him easily enough, but putting him down is the hard part" kinds of bricks than the more Superman-type "try even piercing his skin and you'll have a bad time".
Makes it better for a warrior-type character, imo.