Exar Kun vs Novel Viitate

Originally posted by TenebrousWay
Vitiate is Maul tier. 👆

Originally posted by MythLord
Semantics, darling. But as a Jedi, he must've been in the Temple at least once, lmao. 👆

Let's just all hold hands and whistle a song about how Vitiate is actually utter garbage.

They know. They're just being stupid.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
That's hyperbole. Otherwise Kun > Abeloth.

Am I wrong or are all the ones technically in a inaccessible location or something that would exclude them from the list? I thought that the force would have existed in all the galaxies in the entire SW universe....

Abeloth is in the Maw, which is in the galaxy.

When that's hyperbole but "a dozen times stronger" isn't.

So....Kun>Abeloth......

Let the erryone > Abeloth wanking begin.

Or you could, y'know, dismiss that one quote.

God forbid we use some common sense and realize Abeloth and Vitiate aren't included in quotes from the 90s when they weren't established until decades later.

Fine, I can live with Kun>Ulic>Ragnos........
💃 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃

Which sucks caulk, bcuz he's basically the only other Sith worth considering for a top 20 Force-user list.

Ulic isn't above Ragnos, rofl.

Sorry, I am to buzzy jumping around because Ulic>Ragnos....

By the time he was finally defeated, Ulic Qel-Droma had become a formidable Dark Lord of the Sith, second only to his partner Exar Kun.
- The Dark Side Sourcebook

Yep.

And Marka Ragnos (and Naga Sadow and Ludo Kressh) already existed at the time.

So much for the "Golden Age."

Originally posted by TheMuser
By the time he was finally defeated, Ulic Qel-Droma had become a formidable Dark Lord of the Sith, second only to his partner Exar Kun.
- The Dark Side Sourcebook

Were there any other Jen'ari alive by the time he was finally defeated?

Not including Vitiate.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Yeah, no shit. Droma was second to Kun in the Brotherhood.

He was second to Kun as a dark lord of the sith....and as a dark lord of the sith Kun>Ragnos/Nadd/Sadow/everyone else.

Originally posted by TheMuser
He was second to Kun as a dark lord of the sith....and as a dark lord of the sith Kun>Ragnos/Nadd/Sadow/everyone else.

The quote isn't saying Droma is second amongst the Dark Lords in history, but rather he's a Dark Lord but second to Kun.

There's a reason that quote's been known for decades and no one ever brought it up. It only states the obvious: Kun > Droma > other Brotherhood Sith.

Second to Kun, whom is at the top means>Ragnos/Nadd/Sadow/everyone else?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Lmfao.

The quote isn't saying Droma is second amongst the Dark Lords, but rather he's a Dark Lord but second to Kun.

There's a reason that quote's been known for decades and no one ever brought t up. It only states the obvious: Kun > Droma > other Brotherhood Sith.

👆

This is painfully obvious.