Originally posted by NemeBro
Let me tell you what you are doing. You are essentially saying that Thor wins because he benefits from a much better budget.
And much better choreography and much more consistent fighting feats. You can whine all you want but there's no getting away from the fact that Supergirl is a crappy fighter. Even she admitted it.
And if you really think that Supergirl and this guy fights just as fast and skilled as Thor then you need to get your eyes checked:
Originally posted by FrothByte
And much better choreography
This doesn't matter. He has much better choreography than Reeves Superman too. Does Thor beat him?
and much more consistent fighting feats.
Yeah, like consistently running from gatling gun bullets.
You can whine all you want but there's no getting away from the fact that Supergirl is a crappy fighter. Even she admitted it.
That's nice. She'd still manhandle Thor with one hand. She could literally force Thor's entire body up her ass hole and compress it to the size of a marble, and then proceed to push the now-dead Thor marble out of her butthole the next time she takes a Brooklyn Steamer. The gap in physical stats is that high my lad.
And if you really think that Supergirl and this guy fights just as fast and skilled as Thor then you need to get your eyes checked:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jqZQWuuaF8
Yeah Thor sluggishly swinging his hammer in those wide arcs is so much faster lmao.
Sorry bud, I'm not going to ignore Supergirl's vastly greater feats just because her show's budget can't afford SUPER HIGH OCTANE EXTREME COOL collateral damage like Thor's films. Your only argument is that Supergirl has trouble with foes who you are assuming to be weaker than Thor. Yet they can contend with a being that has feats that effortlessly shit on Thor's.
As for speed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUk_0lWD39s
Yeah no, even in "combat speed" Supergirl has feats far superior than Thor's. Did they not happen because her fight with Reactron wasn't as visually fast?
Oh and you didn't answer. Reevesman vs. Thor, who wins?
Originally posted by Silent MasterCan you show me disputing this?
Thor having far better fight choreography proves that he is more skilled.
My argument was never that Supergirl is more skilled than Thor. Just that she could literally hold him down and eat him, and he wouldn't be able to stop her as he feebly squirmed in her grasp.
Frothbyte seems to think that Thor's choreography proves he is stronger and faster than Supergirl, despite her much better feats.
Originally posted by NemeBro
This doesn't matter. He has much better choreography than Reeves Superman too. Does Thor beat him?Yeah, like consistently running from gatling gun bullets.
That's nice. She'd still manhandle Thor with one hand. She could literally force Thor's entire body up her ass hole and compress it to the size of a marble, and then proceed to push the now-dead Thor marble out of her butthole the next time she takes a Brooklyn Steamer. The gap in physical stats is that high my lad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jqZQWuuaF8
Yeah Thor sluggishly swinging his hammer in those wide arcs is so much faster lmao.
Sorry bud, I'm not going to ignore Supergirl's vastly greater feats just because her show's budget can't afford SUPER HIGH OCTANE EXTREME COOL collateral damage like Thor's films. Your only argument is that Supergirl has trouble with foes who you are assuming to be weaker than Thor. Yet they can contend with a being that has feats that effortlessly shit on Thor's.
As for speed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUk_0lWD39s
Yeah no, even in "combat speed" Supergirl has feats far superior than Thor's. Did they not happen because her fight with Reactron wasn't as visually fast?
Oh and you didn't answer. Reevesman vs. Thor, who wins?
Does Reeve Superman regularly get beat up by opponents vastly physically inferior to him?
So Thor swings a roundhouse hit with his hammer as slowly as Supergirl throws a jab. You really think this is going to help your argument?
Originally posted by FrothByte
Does Reeve Superman regularly get beat up by opponents vastly physically inferior to him?
The stooges in the second movie don't have any feats on par with him, so by your own pseudo-logic yes. 🙂
So Thor swings a roundhouse hit with his hammer as slowly as Supergirl throws a jab. You really think this is going to help your argument?
2:34 in your video, Supergirl's jab is less than a second. It happens within 2:35's time frame.
0:25 in my Thor vs. Loki fight Thor takes nearly a full second to do a jabbing hammer strike. Starts at the start of 0:26 and ends just before 0:27. So even by your dumb pseudo-logic and after you cherry-picked the fight you wanted to use to downplay Supergirl, you're wrong!
So judging by your complete inability to respond to the bulk of my post, can you just give me your concession now? Your posts are getting repetitive and dull. There's no reason to draw your beating out any further. 👇
Well there were those times where she struggled to get out of quicksand, fight a normal human in a power suit, and had to get bailed out of a jam, along with Flash, by the fire department.
I'm of the opinion that Thor would win now because he's more powerful but because Supergirl is consitently inconsistent with her abilities. For example she can casually lift 2 million tons and fly around the world yet struggles with normal humans if they have some kind of powersuit. Ít doesn't help that electricity has Bern show to hurt Supergirl which is something Thor can use.