Oh Conservatives...

Your first reply:

Originally posted by Robtard
I find it absolutely disgusting, hoping they throw the book at him, make it be an example for other politicians who want to use their position of power and influence for deplorable means such as this.

Doesn't tell me a thing, answers zero questions. Next.

Response: It seems like you're trying to say my poor view of Conservatives is the same as your poor view of black people. IHMO, you're just setting yourself up to fail there. But you do what you feel is right.

This isn't an answer either, next.

I do find it interesting that you had a whole eight negative words to say about child prostitution, but nearly eight times that amount to complain and play victim. Odd.

Is there an answer buried in here? You said you answered in your first reply. I see no actual "yes I'd find it racist" or "no I wouldn't care". You saying what my response "seems" like is no answer.

Originally posted by Surtur
And to think if he'd just answered my question..or here is a thought: just made the title "Oklahoma lawmaker arrested on child prostitution charges" there would have been no reason.

Guess it's a lesson about thinking before you post, yeah?

...but not a conservative? so in other words you wouldn't be so assmad if he had left out that factual detail, eh?

thanks for proving that you're little panties are in a bunch simply because he pointed out that the politician is (yet another deeply-closeted) conservative.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...but not a conservative? so in other words you wouldn't be so assmad if he had left out that factual detail, eh?

thanks for proving that you're little panties are in a bunch simply because he pointed out that the politician is (yet another deeply-closeted) conservative.

I don't care if he points out things. I'm simply saying the "Oh Conservatives" doesn't sound like it's about a particular conservative, but all of them.

Thus my response on if he'd whine or call it racist if I did the same thing, but replaced conservatives with blacks. Of course I have to admit I asked him already knowing the answer. I was just curious if he'd acknowledge it.

For instance, here is Robby Rob in another topic:

Originally posted by Robtard
IMO, when you blanket the masses due to the actions of the few (by comparison) in order to demonize a people, that's probably due to racism.

Well to be fair conservatives aren't a race, but they are a group, so surely by his logic it is some kind of "ism". I truly look forward to seeing how you spin this lol. He's pretty clear you shouldn't blanket an entire group over the actions of a few.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your first reply:

Doesn't tell me a thing, answers zero questions. Next.

This isn't an answer either, next.

Is there an answer buried in here? You said you answered in your first reply. I see no actual "yes I'd find it racist" or "no I wouldn't care". You saying what my response "seems" like is no answer.

-That's an on-topic reply, cos topic

-It actually does tell you, you just need to see it

-No, above and it's not really "buried", you just have to use your mind

So it seems like you're doing two things here: 1) Trying your best to shift the topic away from a Conservative politician doing something awful, cos we all know you believe only Liberals do awful thing 2) Trying to railroad me into answering in a very specific way. Lolz. Like I'd fall for your games.

You didn't answer, it's okay man..I already know the answer.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
thanks for proving that you're little panties are in a bunch simply because he pointed out that the politician is (yet another deeply-closeted) conservative.

In hindsight, I should have altered the story to say it was a Liberal politician from New York or California, he would have been very interested in staying on topic and insisting how this is yet another example of how shitty Liberals are.

Originally posted by Robtard
In hindsight, I should have altered the story to say it was a Liberal politician from New York or California, he would have been very interested in staying on topic and insisting how this is yet another example of how shitty Liberals are.

Or just not tried to blanket an entire group after 2-3 days ago you replied on this board whining how that is wrong?

But go on and explain to us why this time it's different. I look forward to it.

it's only okay when buttsurt does it

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's only okay when buttsurt does it

Lol I apologize if it grinds your gears that I dared to bring up the line of thought Rob was putting out..just yesterday lol. I thought it was 2-3 days, but nope yesterday.

So that's actually kind of hilarious that he posts this topic within 24 hours of this:

Originally posted by Robtard
IMO, when you blanket the masses due to the actions of the few (by comparison) in order to demonize a people, that's probably due to racism.

iirc, the "mob of thousand immigrant rapist" was a hoax, confirmed by German police. I didn't feel like looking into your other claims.

Lol, too funny.

so basically it's only okay when you do it. that's exactly what you're trying to assert here, MP.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so basically it's only okay when you do it. that's exactly what you're trying to assert here, MP.

By saying this you're admitting your pal Rob is doing it. You realize this, yes?

Also here is the hilarity in you saying I do it too: you and your pals claim to be better than me. You sure you wanna use my supposed behavior as a benchmark? Explain to me how that makes any sense.

of course he is committing a sweeping generalization. now answer my question, MP: why is this suddenly offensive when you've cheerleader every single sweeping generalization thread that suits your own 'stupid/evil libtards' narrative? (and yes, i'm well aware that you won't give a straight answer because you're a disingenuous coward)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
of course he is committing a sweeping generalization. now answer my question, MP: why is this suddenly offensive when you've cheerleader every single sweeping generalization thread that suits your own 'stupid/evil libtards' narrative? (and yes, i'm well aware that you won't give a straight answer because you're a disingenuous coward)

There is no cowardice because..I don't find it offensive?

Why is it offensive to point out someones behavior in terms of how it measures up to the past things they have said?

You've already admitted Rob is full of shit and will make sweeping generalizations when it suits him, all the while he is whining if someone does it to the wrong group.

Surtur, some might consider it creepy that you're doing your best to derail the topic away from a sexual predator, because he happens to be a conservative politician. Just saying, guy.

Anyhow, on topic:

Shortey has yet to resign from the Oklahoma Senate, and NewsChannel 4 has learned he will be able to keep his state retirement, even if he’s convicted. -snip

“He offered him money for sexual contact, he then picked up that minor and took him to a hotel for that purpose,” Cleveland Co. First Asst. District Attorney Susan Caswell said -snip

In the messages, Shortey reportedly called the teen “baby boy.”

Police say the teen wrote, “Hey keep updated cause I want you bad daddy.”

Police say Shortey used a graphic word and replied that he was going to have sex with the teen “like a good little boy if you keep calling me daddy.” -snip

Link

That's just disturbing

Yeah, nobody cares though. Like 6 people visit this part of the board. So when you say "some" might consider it creepy, you mean a handful of posters. Which, if they are the posters I think..certainly have no room to talk shit about anyone.

Even your pal has more or less said you're a hypocrite without directly saying it, so yeah lol, continue.

"like a good little boy if you keep calling me daddy.”
*shudder* man, conservatives keep getting creepier and creepier.

'what's good for the goose...', buttsurt 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah, nobody cares though. Like 6 people visit this part of the board. So when you say "some" might consider it creepy, you mean a handful of posters. Which, if they are the posters I think..certainly have no room to talk shit about anyone.

Even your pal has more or less said you're a hypocrite without directly saying it, so yeah lol, continue.

So you don't give a shit about child prostitution, but you'll make endless posts and have diatribes to say about how Rachel Maddox said something silly or Amy Schumer stopped her show to rant about Trump. Lolz. Priorities I guess.

So avoiding your pals hypocrisy? Cool, that is a way to go.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"like a good little boy if you keep calling me daddy.”
*shudder* man, conservatives keep getting creepier and creepier.

'what's good for the goose...', buttsurt 🙂

Straight up creepy creepertons

Originally posted by Robtard
So you don't give a shit about child prostitution, but you'll make endless posts and have diatribes to say about how Rachel Maddox said something silly or Amy Schumer stopped her show to rant about Trump. Lolz. Priorities I guess.

I said nobody cares if I seem creepy. I never said I don't care about child prostitution.

Did you want to use child prostitution to distract from your hilarious hypocrisy? Okay man, we can. It's already been established anyways, so you are right, nothing more to say about you.

This is very very wrong and the person should be put in prison.