Originally posted by TenebrousWay
What?! I'm saying that if it takes four people to stop Revan to take control of the Foundry, it doesn't mean it takes 4 people to to defeat HK, or that it takes 4 people to take down fodder droids in the flashpoint. I'm not understanding what's your point at all.
You aren't difficult to understand; you just don't make any logical sense. You don't get to make that distinction because it suits your argument. It cannot get anymore clear than that. Obviously it doesn't take four people to defeat droids. Why should it take four people to defeat Revan because of that fact? No reason whatsoever. Those two things do not connect. "He's super duper powerful" is also not an argument. You need an in story reason for any argument you make. Point blank.
What prevents Malgus from fighting two teams, by the way? 🙂 The fact there are only four people there may simple be game mechanics, who knows. 🙂🙂🙂
The fact that that there is only one team, for starters.
Additionaly, the fact two teams are referred there gives more support to the team mode than the solo mode, regardless of TOR not having a canon story.
No, being factually incorrect about a scenario in game does not lend credence. In my experience, being wrong actually does the opposite.
LMFAO. My comment about HK being difficult was a reply to Petrus, who considered him to be difficult to beat. So I never presumed myself to hold "authority on what is and what is not difficult."
You seem to think you are more difficult to understand than you are, while also constantly misunderstanding arguments. You aren't. You didn't even understand what Petrus said. The point is that HK "requires" a team in game for his fight. Revan "requires" a team in game for his fight. What logical reasoning are you making for a team being needed for one but not the other, when you are basing it solely on Revan being big, bad, and important? Nothing, really. Game mechanics are what make these two need teams to be faced. Game mechanics that both no longer require. Nothing in story says it takes a team, as opposed to SoR where it is said. This is not that hard to understand.
You could've gone direct to the point and stated that you consider flashpoints to be completely game mechanics without any connection to the story at all.
I sure could have, but that's not the point I was making so that would be absolutely retarded.
I'm going to disagree with you, especially if the closest material to a "canon" we've states otherwise.
That's nice. Your disagreement isn't evidence within itself, however, nor does there being evidence make that evidence legitimate or your logic sound. You still have to actually make your point, and that point has to make sense.