Exar Kun vs. Vitiate.

Started by The Merchant3 pages
The Merchant Senior Member

Exar Kun vs. Vitiate.

This is Exar Kun in his prime. This is Vitiate right after he absorbed Nathema. Who wins? Duel takes place in the plains of Dantooine.

Azronger Azronger Reborn

Exar stomps

deathslash Pyromaniacal Humanitarian

Originally posted by Azronger
Exar stomps
how powerful was exar in his prime?

chingchangwalla Restricted
Originally posted by Azronger
Exar stomps
DarthAnt66 DarthAnt66

Vitiate, obviously.

Azronger Azronger Reborn
Originally posted by deathslash
how powerful was exar in his prime?

More powerful than novel Vitiate.

Unbowed Senior Member

Exar Kun.

DarthAnt66 DarthAnt66

Originally posted by deathslash
how powerful was exar in his prime?

Less powerful than novel Vitiate.

Beniboybling Worst Member

Originally posted by deathslash
how powerful was exar in his prime?
sub-Vader 🙂

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Vitiate in a good fight.

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by Azronger
More powerful than novel Vitiate.

Really?

Vitiate literally dwarfs Exar Kun in power and capabilities as of SWTOR. How much power progression do you think he had in a span of 300 years since the events of Revan?

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by Azronger
More powerful than novel Vitiate.

Vitiate literally dwarfs Exar Kun in hype, power and capabilities as of SWTOR. How much power progression do you think he had in a span of 300 years since the events of Revan?

Your assessment is off and the sources you cling to for it do not identify acknowledge of Vitiate. Exar Kun's hype is valid for only the KNOWN aspects of the galaxy at the time. Vitiate was a hidden threat during those years.

Beniboybling Worst Member

#triggered

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

^^^

I just addressed his point. These topics do not trigger me.

Beniboybling Worst Member
Azronger Azronger Reborn

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Vitiate literally dwarfs Exar Kun in hype, power and capabilities as of SWTOR. How much power progression do you think he had in a span of 300 years since the events of Revan?

Your assessment is off and the sources you cling to for it do not identify acknowledge of Vitiate. Exar Kun's hype is valid for only the KNOWN aspects of the galaxy at the time. Vitiate was a hidden threat during those years.

Vitiate was actively draining Revan for those three centuries, so I imagine he grew quite a lot.

They don't have to outright mention Vitiate for him to be included in the quote. And nowhere is it stated Kun's quote only applies to the known galaxy. Stop using contexts that don's exist.

samappo Senior Member

This is Vitiate before he used the massive ritual on Nathema though?

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by Azronger
Vitiate was actively draining Revan for those three centuries, so I imagine he grew quite a lot.

Siphoning energy of a subject does not nets the wielder considerable gains in strength over a period of time. Much of that energy went into satiating Vitiate's hunger (confirmed to be a side-effect of his immortality in KoTET).

Originally posted by Azronger
They don't have to outright mention Vitiate for him to be included in the quote. And nowhere is it stated Kun's quote only applies to the known galaxy. Stop using contexts that don's exist.

1. Those sources are outdated.
2. You need to prove that an outdated source holds precedence over content that came after it, that revisions/reassessments are unnecessary.
3. TOR sources cover Exar Kun and do not affirm his superiority over Vitiate at any point in history.

Your FANON standing on this issue, has no value.

Geistalt SilenceThatSpeaksVolumes

You also forgot to mention that there were OTHER folks Vitiate drained. Like the Hand.

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by Geistalt
You also forgot to mention that there were OTHER folks Vitiate drained. Like the Hand.

So?

How much do you think Palpatine gained from siphoning the energy of his subjects on Byss over a period of time? Not much.