Exar Kun vs. Vitiate.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Siphoning energy of a subject does not nets the wielder considerable gains in strength over a period of time. Much of that energy went into satiating Vitiate's hunger (confirmed to be a side-effect of his immortality in KoTET).

Oh, so Vitiate has a hunger that needs to be sated now?

And if your immortality needs to be prolonged then it's not immortality. 😂

1. Those sources are outdated.

That's only the case if they were retconned. Provide said retcon or stop saying they're outdated.

2. You need to prove that an outdated source holds precedence over content that came after it. That revisions are unnecessary.

No I don't since the content isn't outdated. 😂

3. TOR sources cover Exar Kun and do not affirm his superiority over Vitiate at any point in history.

Irrelevant, unless a they retconned something.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
My FANON standing on this issue, has no value.

Correct 👆

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
So?

How much do you think Palpatine gained from siphoning the energy of his subjects on Byss over a period of time? Not much.

Originally posted by Azronger
Oh, so Vitiate has a hunder that needs to be sated now?

And if your immortality needs to be prolonged then it's not immortality. 😂

True immortality is not possible because nobody is omnipotent in Star Wars, my son. Even The Father was dying.

Originally posted by Azronger
That's only the case if they were retconned. Provide said retcon or stop saying they're outdated.

Originally posted by Azronger
No I don't since the content isn't outdated. 😂

Originally posted by Azronger
Irrelevant, unless a they retconned something.

Do some reading: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Retcon

Originally posted by Azronger
Correct 👆

Originally posted by Beniboybling
On what basis? Kek.

Yeah not seeing it, try again maybe?

^^^

Get your eyes checked, maybe?

Palpatine is telling Lord Vader that his energy-siphoning effort in Byss is merely slowing the decay of his crude matter.

As opposed to granting him immortality. Right, doesn't prove your point.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
As opposed to granting him immortality. Right, doesn't prove your point.

Can you quantify his gains from Byss?

Like Palpy said, yeah.

No I can't, so I'm curious as to how you managed. mmm

Originally posted by Beniboybling
No I can't, so I'm curious as to how you managed. mmm

Holy shit, Legend is dumb 😆

Originally posted by Azronger
Holy shit, Legend is dumb 😆

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Then your argument is baseless. Prove me wrong, otherwise.

In which respect, I'm still waiting.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Like Palpy said, yeah.

This is Vitiate right after he gains 'immortality', or rather the power of all those Sith Lords. This is way before he even set foot on Dromund Kaas.

So anything we see him do in SWTOR is irrelevant since we are not talking about that Vitiate?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
No darling, the burden of proof is on you given you are the one who made the claim.

In which respect, I'm still waiting.

"The power of Byss will strengthen the body and the mind, merely slowing the decay of crude matter." (Palpatine)

Byss is not the key to immortality. Palpatine haven't figured it out yet.

"But we will yet discover the ultimate secret, my friend." (Palpatine)

Uhuh, you said that already pally. Try to understand though that simply because it didn't make him immortal, doesn't mean he didn't gain significantly from it.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Uhuh, you said that already pally. Try to understand though that simply because it didn't make him immortal, doesn't mean he didn't gain significantly from it.

Nope, he's speaking specifically in terms of immortality, not in general. Try not to be such a dolt.

Yeah, that's true. You can't say for sure that he's talking in general. But we do know that he is speaking specifically about immortality.