Originally posted by deathslash
you're only looking at this from one point of view, cage has gone up against far more powerful characters than himself and still won. What makes bane (who is undeniably physically inferior) win against a guy whose averages put him in the high meta level and whose high end feats put him in the mid to high herald tier? Do you believe that bane could do as well as cage did against rhino, wrecker, venom, Ms marvel, the thing, namor, or the hulk?Do you want to get into a lifting debate? We both know that Cage has better strength feats.
Do you want to get into a durability debate? We both know that Cage has taken punches from heralds and kept fighting without a problem. Hell, he tanked a nuke and only died from radiation.
Do you want to debate speed? Bane may be faster, but that's arguable since cage has still tagged the likes of spider-man and living laser (look at that nice high end showing that should be discounted because of how utterly rediculous it is).
What in you opinion makes bane (a character with a history of having trouble/losing to street levelers) beat Luke Cage? I would assume that the "mast of 127 styles" would at least teach the kid how to break a grapple or that he at least picked it up when he trained with the league of assassin's.
Bane has taken hits from heralds, too. A pissed off Superman comes to mind.
And Jason being an expert in MA doesn't mean he can easily grapple out of high level heralds grips. Now you're just downplaying that feat, just like you did the others.