Originally posted by Impediment
Absolutely. If an intruder illegally enters my home, then I will use deadly force to protect myself and my family. I don't know the intentions of said intruder, and I will assume a worst case scenario that grievous harm is imminent and will not hesitate to shoot to kill.
This sums it up. Even in the dark, like this, you don't know their intentions.
Originally posted by Robtard
The two people here who I think actually would act if someone invaded their home are Imp with his military training and guns and you, likely via bludgeoning until unconcious and then sexual molestation.eWarriors like Silent would lock themselves inside their bathrooms, shitting himself; ready to offer his rectum at a moment's notice in exchange for not being harmed.
Kurk would just run to his parent's room, some urine may or may not escape during his journey.
Do me, do me...
How would I react?
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]
Sorry to know that these 3 potential Leftist Progressive Voters are now only re contributing to their Mother Earth.Feed the Worms Boys. Feed the Worms.
[/B]
Make the world a better place. Kill yourself.
--
This was self-defense. Three against one? What else was he going to do?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Very beginning, 911 dispatcher confirms back (because recording had not yet started) that they were trying to break into the house and he open fire on them.Also, it says right there in the video description that the weapons were found on their bodies, not before.
Look....I just beat you at your own game. You're not even talking about the topic.
You're just making assumptions at this point.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This sums it up. Even in the dark, like this, you don't know their intentions.
I suppose one could argue the guy with the gun should have verbally alerted the intruders that he was armed, but even then..first off doing so could have alerted them to his position and if they had guns it could endanger his life..but on top of that f you're panicking unfortunately you don't always make rational decisions, and these intruders instigated this panic-ridden situation where someone was forced into thinking they were in a position where they needed to make snap life or death decisions.
Also location probably matters. I don't know how dangerous Tulsa is, but living in Chicago I absolutely would not be hesitating to open fire if I had a gun lol. People have been murdered here over cell phones.
Originally posted by Bentley
You kill one guy and said "you next?", if the guy doesn't turn tail at that moment, you just shoot and say "kidding".
If the guy is armed though..stopping to say "you next" opens you up to being shot in the face.
I personally would not risk my life for some thugs.
People need to stop playing stupid games if they are so opposed to receiving stupid prizes.
Originally posted by Surtur
If the guy is armed though..stopping to say "you next" opens you up to being shot in the face.I personally would not risk my life for some thugs.
People need to stop playing stupid games if they are so opposed to receiving stupid prizes.
Well, you live in America so people are probably carrying grenade launchers in their pocket.
This is still a very contextual situation. I'd feel justified to shot a kid if I believed he was likely to be a suicide bomber, but how likely that is depends in a number of things. The same thing here. Not my fault you expect every "thug" to be armed to their teeth.
Originally posted by Bentley
Well, you live in America so people are probably carrying grenade launchers in their pocket.
I live in Chicago on top of that, I don't expect grenade launchers, but I would expect to be shot in the face for no reason. Or set on fire and then shot in the face(Yep, happened recently near me).
This is still a very contextual situation. I'd feel justified to shot a kid if I believed he was likely to be a suicide bomber, but how likely that is depends in a number of things. The same thing here. Not my fault you expect every "thug" to be armed to their teeth.
Not sure why you need to go straight to suicide bomber. It could just be a thief willing to kill if necessary. Or maybe someone who isn't planning to kill, but is still capable of it.
I don't expect every thug to be armed to the teeth, but I also don't expect to be able to tell what these people are thinking and my life is more important than theirs lol. So I wouldn't risk it.
I would try to preserve life if possible, but a lot depends on reactions/context, physical situation and overall risk. I certainly won't censor people who want to protect themselves, who could actually hold that against you?
The actual risk with starting by shooting is that things quickly escalate from there. If instead of stupid kids robbing the same place twice you had a more professional group of criminals and you misjudge their numbers and shoot, it's unlikely you walk away at all. I'll give it to you that most robbers are stupid though, so you play it safe by the odds.
Originally posted by dadudemon
It's so weird...I do not understand why he wants to argue with me. We agree on his point. I think we should be able to make Swiss cheese out of home invaders. Many people do not.
Yup, feel the same, no one here has said the shooter needs to be punished or that he was in the wrong. Some people just like to force arguments where they don't exist.