Originally posted by SurturYou've become wholly incoherent, so I'm just going to assume this is a concession and move on.
I said the context was they were just attacked. People were talking about Clinton being a war hawk, and in the past she had talked about going after Russia and stuff.Did you have any further questions or comments?
Originally posted by Surtur
Yes, from years ago.People change their minds on things.
LoL, look at you defend your golden calf. But they're not all from "years ago", like this from a few months ago.
"Hillary wants to start a shooting war in Syria... that could very well lead to World War III." -Donald J. Trump 11/2016 via rally in Florida
Originally posted by RobtardMissiles don't count as bullets tho. Not really shooting.
LoL, look at you defend your golden calf. But they're not all from "years ago", like this from a few months ago."Hillary wants to start a shooting war in Syria... that could very well lead to World War III." -Donald J. Trump 11/2016 via rally in Florida
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, look at you defend your golden calf. But they're not all from "years ago", like this from a few months ago."Hillary wants to start a shooting war in Syria... that could very well lead to World War III." -Donald J. Trump 11/2016 via rally in Florida
My mistake, I thought people were referring to his comments to Obama after his line in the sand got crossed.
But like I said, the attack obviously made him change his stance.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay, and obviously the chemical attacks caused him to change his stance on Syria.Anything else?
Lol, when Trump was saying Obama shouldn't attack it was after Assad first used Chem weapons in 2013. Any more flips?
Assad used Syrin gas on 3/19/13
"Again to our very foolish leader, do not attack Syria - if you do many very bad things will happen & from that fight the US gets nothing!" -Donald J. Trump 9/05/13 via Twitter
Originally posted by Robtard
Lol, when Trump was saying Obama shouldn't attack it was after Assad first used Chem weapons in 2013. Any more flips?
I just acknowledged that is what I thought was being referred to, anything else?
You also didn't respond to my comment about Trump criticizing Putin. If he does it, you won't say it's only being done to give people the impression they aren't in cahoots, right?
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, look at your flips, you just said that Trump's excused from his previous anti-engagement remarks into Syria because of the use of chem weapons, when this isn't the first time.
It's the first time it's happened under his presidency that I recall.
I ask again: Trump comes out and criticizes Putin, your response is what?
So Trump was correct in calling Obama foolish if he attacked Syria for using chem-weapons, but now that a chem-attack has happened under Trump, it's cool to attack cos chem-weapons are bad.
Your mental gymnastics in defending Trump is amusing, sport.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay, and obviously the chemical attacks caused him to change his stance on Syria.Anything else?
*Assad used Syrin gas on 3/19/13*
"Again to our very foolish leader, do not attack Syria - if you do many very bad things will happen & from that fight the US gets nothing!" -Donald J. Trump 9/05/13 via Twitter
Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: It's okay when Trump does it.
Sucks when parties have this attitude, I agree.
Dunno, will have to wait until it happens as I can't see into the future. Personally, I'm not holding by breath for it to happen. You can though, go on.
Based on your history I am going to make a prediction: if Trump comes out and criticizes Putin, you will say it is just an attempt to convince people he is not beholden to Putin.
At the same time, if he never comes out and criticizes him you will find a way to fit that into your "he is beholden to Putin" narrative as well.