Originally posted by Zack M
King Shark proved no match for OMAC. Plus, in that same arc, OMAC treated POWERGIRL like nothing.
My point was OMAC couldn't Oneshot Nanue, Aquaman did pretty much indirectly with more people as support for KS in the Aquaman instance as well.
Aquaman has the best chance to physically end things because of his Trident is my point.
Can't really remember Powergirl doing anything in the Nu52 that's impressive unless we scale off Darkseid..
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
My point was OMAC couldn't Oneshot him, Aquaman did pretty much indirectly with more people as support for KS in the Aquaman instance as well.Can't really remember Powergirl doing anything in the Nu52 that's impressive unless we scale off Darkseid..
She held a whole mountain range in that arc. Beastly strength feat.
Michael's sword>>Trident.
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
Strength has never equated to Striking power it doesn't in comics or irl so I don't get the point. On top of that Superman is a character that typically holds back there's no excuse for OMAC in that instance because it's not something we can suggest he's doing.I'm working alot and going to school, so I'm just going to address the incorrect points and ignore the childish remarks.
What relevance does what Superman says make? Here you are making assertions I didn't again. Superman could say whatever he wants it doesn't make it fact. He repeatedly changes his mind on who the most powerful or dangerous person on the planet is, mind you.
I could show you examples of Supes struggling with characters way below his weight range to. Ironically you brought up he holds back and your trying to use him as an example for OMAC... A bit double standardized...
If someone hits you with a baseball bat and you catch it with your hands. Taking in that force is durability as well as strength if you stopped that forward movement.
Aquaman's original trident is indestructible, the Poseidon one isn't shown in JLRebirrh's first story. I'm not hiding anything. It honestly makes the fact a weaker trident could do that better in regards to the original. On top of that to be able to peirce anything that is extremely durable you'd need the strength to do so..
Also Rao wasnt any less durable which you can't prove.. He used some of the life force of his followers which is a regenerative trait. It's what makes him immortal. Really hard stuff to lowball but the circles being made to do it is impressive.
I really don't get what's with this piercing stuff... Id think it was common sense to know. If you have a titanium knife that doesn't mean you can stab into 5 in. of metal. Without the strength to do it. There's some precedence of blunt force durability in regards to piercing...
Also Hal used chainsaw constructs on Darkseid to no effect so that's not correct on your part
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BINUcqQDy-g/UwncR1eCkpI/AAAAAAAAnZQ/bOVTQkbugKw/s1600/p6_2.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0tMiZNlP7EY/UwncV4UomhI/AAAAAAAAnag/uRmqAio-pBs/s1600/p6_3.jpg
Oh you and your aquaman fanaticism.
Originally posted by Zack M
I'll try and find them later. OMAC also killed King Shark's dad, pretty easily. Overall, KS wasn't any type of threat.Frankenstein also restrained Wonder Woman, killed Solomon Grundy (For a time), stalemated OMAC, etc...
Aquman is out of his depth, IMO.
I think your downplaying the KS fight against OMAC. You end a fight with someone whose no threat in one or 2 panels not several.
I do agree OMAC was obviously the superior which was obvious given KS was tag teaming against OMAC and still on the losing end.
It still doesn't change the fact a bite from KS harmed OMAC or that KS was able to take several hits before going down.
You'd have to show me the other instances. I remember Frank tossing Diana in a panel during Trinity War. But nothing like being restrained by just Frank.
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
I think your downplaying the KS fight against OMAC. You end a fight with someone whose no threat in one or 2 panels not several.I do agree OMAC was obviously the superior which was obvious given KS was tag teaming against OMAC and still on the losing end.
It still doesn't change the fact a bite from KS harmed OMAC or that KS was able to take several hits before going down.
You'd have to show me the other instances. I remember Frank tossing Diana in a panel during Trinity War. But nothing like being restrained by just Frank.
KS has a good bite, but my point still stands, OMAC is superior.
Originally posted by Zack M
KS has a good bite, but my point still stands, OMAC is superior.
I even keyworded what I'm focusing on and it's being danced away and ignored for some reason. KS took multiple shots from OMAC. As well as harmed him via bite.
I agree OMAC is superior to KS so it's a point we both share.
Originally posted by EcstaticGraceSuperman remarked on his strength specifically after getting hit and grabbed by him:
Strength has never equated to Striking power it doesn't in comics or irl so I don't get the point. On top of that Superman is a character that typically holds back there's no excuse for OMAC in that instance because it's not something we can suggest he's doing.What relevance does what Superman says make? Here you are making assertions I didn't again. Superman could say whatever he wants it doesn't make it fact. He repeatedly changes his mind on who the most powerful or dangerous person on the planet is, mind you.
I could show you examples of Supes struggling with characters way below his weight range to. Ironically you brought up he holds back and your trying to use him as an example for OMAC... A bit double standardized...
It's irrelevant whether OMAC truly is or not stronger than Superman - the mere fact that Superman would take it as a possibility puts him far above Aquaman.
Don't tell me you believe Superman would ever say Aquaman might be stronger than him. Is that your position, dummy?
Originally posted by EcstaticGraceThe fact that you're going to school is a good thing - hopefully in a few years you'll at least be able to form a rational thought!
I'm working alot and going to school, so I'm just going to address the incorrect points and ignore the childish remarks.
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
Aquaman's original trident is indestructible, the Poseidon one isn't shown in JLRebirrh's first story. I'm not hiding anything. It honestly makes the fact a weaker trident could do that better in regards to the original. On top of that to be able to peirce anything that is extremely durable you'd need the strength to do so..Also Rao wasnt any less durable which you can't prove.. He used some of the life force of his followers which is a regenerative trait. It's what makes him immortal. Really hard stuff to lowball but the circles being made to do it is impressive.
You're a misleading piece of shit for not specifying the fact that it's completely different tridents, and you're on minus credibility now, since you were already on 0.
You can't transfer feats, no matter how much you want to do it.
Originally posted by EcstaticGraceRao is a kryptonian, who are specifically weak to magic, explaining him getting pierced by magical items of olympus - such as the spear [Wonder Woman] and the trident [Aquaman, which is not the trident he had against Darkseid].
Also Rao wasnt any less durable which you can't prove.. He used some of the life force of his followers which is a regenerative trait. It's what makes him immortal. Really hard stuff to lowball but the circles being made to do it is impressive.
His connection was severed and he was weakened by Superman beating on him and draining his power.
The fact that you've ignored half a dozen points throughout this discussion as you've got stomped on them, doesn't mean I'm going to let EVERY SINGLE one slip away, doofus.
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
Also Hal used chainsaw constructs on Darkseid to no effect so that's not correct on your parthttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BINUcqQDy-g/UwncR1eCkpI/AAAAAAAAnZQ/bOVTQkbugKw/s1600/p6_2.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0tMiZNlP7EY/UwncV4UomhI/AAAAAAAAnag/uRmqAio-pBs/s1600/p6_3.jpg
A breakable construct from a literal rookie Hal is not proof that Aquaman's piercing ability is beyond Hal's, who has feats like this:
http://i.imgur.com/MObQT6Y.jpg
What's next, Aquaman beats Hal?
Originally posted by Delta1938
Not trying to backseat mod, but maybe people should chill before the topic gets closed? I'm as guilty as everybody else of getting heated. And this is part of why KMC isn't what it was. So maybe we should be more civil?Except to Zack. **** him and his puns. 😠
I retract the piece of shit part 👆
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
This thread can now be closed.
No BFR you piece of shit.
