Originally posted by Azronger
I can use whatever term I want. "The explosion of a superweapon" is perfectly accurate, since, well, the superweapon blew up.If simple space ship lasers caused a Kyber crystal to blow up, then a huge explosion certainly would cause it to blow up as well, lmao.
No proof of kyber crystal exploding on Malachor. It is not that simple. See analogy below:
American warships fired cruise missiles at targets in Syria recently; unexploded munitions were found in the rubble regardless.
Originally posted by slayne
A strike team that can collectively one-shot Vader was pushed to their limits trying to beat Tyth while he was in a weakened state.The notion that Vader even stands a chance against him is hilariously cancerous.
Good job on ignoring all the evidence I presented and then making a random claim with zero evidence.
Now, instead of calling others' opinions cancerous, how about dirctly countering the feats I presented for Vader.
Originally posted by AzrongerThey were strong enough to not do any damage to the structure Tyth was standing on?
Yeah, not even sure they were capital ships. And do the EE ships have other destruction feats, or is everyome just assuming they're impressive because reasons?
Originally posted by GeistaltWhereas most of the EE turbo lasers missed their target. 😂
What's really funny about this is that Galen's attack wasn't even directed at Vader."This" being Az/Beni's argument.
Anyway whether or not Vader can or cannot rank turbolaser blasts doesn't actually prove anything relevant to Tyth beating him. He'd still manage tho. 🙁
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
No, you can't - Darth Vader did not tank a superweapon in this case.No proof of kyber crystal exploding on Malachor. It is not that simple. See analogy below:
American warships fired cruise missiles at targets in Syria recently; unexploded munitions were found in the rubble regardless.
No, but he tanked its explosion. Geez... how hard is this to understand.
And instead of making false analogies, how about actually addressing the point? I'll repeat it here, cause I'm nice: A Kyber crystal exploded due to simple laser fire. So logically, a far more powerful explosion which did hit the crystal, would trigger its explosion as well.
Originally posted by Azronger
Yeah, not even sure they were capital ships. And do the EE ships have other destruction feats, or is everyome just assuming they're impressive because reasons?
A capital ship is considered 100 meters or more in length, so the EF's battlecruisers can be considered such. Of course obviously, this would only factor into what the fleet is comprised of.
Though the Eternal Fleet's ships being labeled as a Battle Cruiser classification is incorrect, dunno why they went with that distinction since they aren't inbetween the lengths of a Star Destroyer or Star Dreadnought.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
A capital ship is considered 100 meters or more in length, so the EF's battlecruisers can be considered such. Of course obviously, this would only factor into what the fleet is comprised of.Though the Eternal Fleet's ships being labeled as a Battle Cruiser classification is incorrect, dunno why they went with that distinction since they aren't inbetween the lengths of a Star Destroyer or Star Dreadnought.
Ah, fair enough.
Originally posted by Azronger
Link. I'm not watching that garbage unless necessary when others can do it for me.
Watch the ending.
Originally posted by Azronger
No, but he tanked its explosion. Geez... how hard is this to understand.And instead of making false analogies, how about actually addressing the point? I'll repeat it here, cause I'm nice: A Kyber crystal exploded due to simple laser fire. So logically, a far more powerful explosion which did hit the crystal, would trigger its explosion as well.
You provide proof of kyber crystal explosion on Malachor.