DOS Doomsday vs. Superboy Prime

Started by Galan0075 pages

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Hmm...

According to Phil, there's now way Superman has fought without a holding back mentality just those two times.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=641086&pagenumber=2

Then again he's flip flopped on this type of thing just before taking that stance. 😬
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=639443&pagenumber=1

Hmm, in briefly skimming through those threads, it looks to me like Phil said exactly what he's saying here: that Superman rarely ever *fully* cuts lose -- which is 100% correct(again, he's only done so twice in 80 years, lol.)

Am I missing something..? 😕

Originally posted by carver9
I'm can't think of a time Thor has cut lose.
That's because you don't read comics, lol.

There's this thing called 'berserker rage' and 'warrior madness, you see... 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
Hmm, in briefly skimming through those threads, it looks to me like Phil said exactly what he's saying here: that Superman rarely ever *fully* cuts lose -- which is 100% correct(again, he's only done so twice in 80 years, lol.)

Am I missing something..? 😕

That's because you don't read comics, lol.

There's this thing called 'berserker rage' and 'warrior madness, you see... 🙂

Lol... "can't think of" is not a definite. I'm not saying he didn't go all out. With that said, Thor only went all out twice in his entire career and Hulk only once. Gotcha. What about Surfer?

Originally posted by Galan007
Hmm, in briefly skimming through those threads, it looks to me like Phil said exactly what he's saying here: that Superman rarely ever *fully* cuts lose -- which is 100% correct(again, he's only done so twice in 80 years, lol.)

Am I missing something..? 😕

That's because you don't read comics, lol.

There's this thing called 'berserker rage' and 'warrior madness, you see... 🙂


Not Superman specifically. He stated on one thread that heroes in general do not hold back. I guess in dire situations like owaw, ww3, etc..???

Then on another thread heroes hold back all of a sudden. Worst part is he cited ww3 twice with two contrasting stances. I guess because Superman was implicated in leo's stance??? Worst case of flip flopping if I ever saw one.

Originally posted by Galan007
Hmm, in briefly skimming through those threads, it looks to me like Phil said exactly what he's saying here: that Superman rarely ever *fully* cuts lose -- which is 100% correct(again, he's only done so twice in 80 years, lol.)

Am I missing something..? 😕

👆

celeytard's reading comprehension seems to be up to par with what I rememberd from when I didn't have him on ignore.

Actually it was sin who used ww3 first on one thread, but same idea. Heroes don't hold back.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol... "can't think of" is not a definite. I'm not saying he didn't go all out.
Love that backpedaling. 👆

Originally posted by carver9
With that said, Thor only went all out twice in his entire career and Hulk only once. Gotcha. What about Surfer?
Do you really want to debate frequency-percentages against f*cking Superman? 😂

*Thor- ~6,300 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Hulk- ~6,100 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Surfer- ~1,900 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.

*Superman- ~12,800 issues, ONLY counting his canon/post-Crisis appearances.

Now these are just ballpark figures, mind you, but they still illustrate my point just fine... Superman has appeared more times on panel than the mainstream versions of Thor, Hulk, and Surfer combined. So again: you REEEALLY don't want to discuss frequency-percentages here. You will NOT win a numbers game against DC's flagship character, lol.

...Even though you're not a 'numbers guy', I'm sure even you can understand that much. 🙂

'Can't think' sounds about right for Carver.

Originally posted by Galan007
Love that backpedaling. 👆

Do you really want to debate frequency-percentages against f*cking Superman? 😂

*Thor- ~6,300 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Hulk- ~6,100 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Surfer- ~1,900 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.

*Superman- [b]~12,800 issues, ONLY counting his canon/post-Crisis appearances.

Now these are just ballpark figures, mind you, but they still illustrate my point just fine... Superman has appeared more times on panel than the mainstream versions of Thor, Hulk, and Surfer combined. So again: you REEEALLY don't want to discuss frequency-percentages here. You will NOT win a numbers game against DC's flagship character, lol.

...Even though you're not a 'numbers guy', I'm sure even you can understand that much. 🙂 [/B]

YouTube video

Originally posted by Galan007
Love that backpedaling. 👆

Do you really want to debate frequency-percentages against f*cking Superman? 😂

*Thor- ~6,300 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Hulk- ~6,100 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.
*Surfer- ~1,900 issues, counting his non-canon/alternate appearances.

*Superman- [b]~12,800 issues, ONLY counting his canon/post-Crisis appearances.

Now these are just ballpark figures, mind you, but they still illustrate my point just fine... Superman has appeared more times on panel than the mainstream versions of Thor, Hulk, and Surfer combined. So again: you REEEALLY don't want to discuss frequency-percentages here. You will NOT win a numbers game against DC's flagship character, lol.

...Even though you're not a 'numbers guy', I'm sure even you can understand that much. 🙂 [/B]

Of course Superman appeared more but again, they all held back 98 to 99% of their comic time which means Thor fight Celestials, Odin, etc... was him containing his power. Hulk facing Onslaught, the Avengers and every other team in Marvel and Abstracts he fought against was him using not even 10% of his power. When it comes to holding back, I'm sure the mean Green contains the most power.

Lmao, WOW. You're a complete idiot. facepalm

Superman has went all-out only twice in his history of comics????? If my writer friends would let me record their laughter and comments... Wow!!! Twice??? Wow!!

Originally posted by JBL
Superman has went all-out only twice in his history of comics????? If my writer friends would let me record their laughter and comments... Wow!!! Twice??? Wow!!

According to you, he's only gone all out once, when he emptied his tank all over Doomsday.

Unless he has dynamic strength, that is.

Originally posted by Galan007
Lmao, WOW. You're a complete idiot. facepalm

You taught me well.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Just out of curiosity, are people here trolling or actually serious that DOS DD > SBP based on 1 statement?
I'll continue reading through this thread but maybe it's one of those kind of statements like "the hardest test I ever took was in the 3rd grade cause of *insert rudimentary concept new to young children like say long division*".

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
According to you, he's only gone all out once, when he emptied his tank all over Doomsday.

Unless he has dynamic strength, that is.

I never said he had went all out only once, he's done it all through his career and no, he does not have dynamic strength as confirmed by my DC writers buds.

Originally posted by JBL
I never said he had went all out only once, he's done it all through his career and no, he does not have dynamic strength as confirmed by my DC writers buds.

😂

@ Pr

My thoughts exactly

"MY DC writers buds"

What are You? Five?

Get the FU©K OUT!

Just because We read comics it doesn't mean We are fu©king children!!!

Are you trying to impress someone in here dude?

Really get the fu©k out of here with those childish statements

Nice thread, thanks to Galans facts and DarkSaints titties 👆
If Supermans been holding back 99% of his career, there goes the argument for his dynamic strength.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
I'll continue reading through this thread but maybe it's one of those kind of statements like "the hardest test I ever took was in the 3rd grade cause of *insert rudimentary concept new to young children like say long division*".
mmm