Do 'real people' worry about SJWS/feminism?

Started by Surtur7 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, Nemebro really nailed Surtur to the wall with that scathing fact-post; if you listen closely, you can still hear the lingering presence of Surtur's moaning

But he really didn't. This is some pseudo-intellectual troll who gave lame excuses as to why other posters apparent obsessions here aren't as bad as my apparent obsessions.

I guess if it makes you feel better you can continue to thumb it up and praise it, but really? It's just the same usual suspects doing it anyways, the same folks who scour topics here looking for stuff and start 10 page long debates over shit.

All bullshit aside, do you genuinely feel that behavior in itself is not sad?

Can you refute any of the truths he dropped? I don't think you can because they're supported with facts.

Originally posted by Robtard
Can you refute any of the truths he dropped? I don't think you can because they're supported with facts.

Lol wow, you know what? Okay. I'm sure the answers won't be satisfactory to you, but you asked.

Keep in mind some of the "facts" apply to multiple posters here. Should I address those too? Or just the ones that specifically apply to me? Ah you know what, I'll do both.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Let me illustrate the difference between Surtur and people who shit on Surtur for the lulz.

Surtur spends inordinate amounts of his time actively looking for SJW/liberal stories to post and mock. He literally has an app that he dedicates to finding these stories for him. He actively asserts that shit like the democrats singing some stupid song is going to be a big deal to people next election, presumably because it will be a big deal to him. Similarly, in this very thread he apparently believes that an old episode of Bill Nye being edited on netflix (presumably by Bill himself because his beliefs have changed?) is "not trivial", which is to say it's an important issue. He actively responds to criticisms of Trump or of the right with various things Hillary or some other leftist did, though he never does this when someone makes a post out of nowhere shitting on Hillary or the left. By comparison, those who shit on him just have to come here to read his posts and make a quick response.

There's an enormous difference in effort lad. I've seen you try to defend Surtur's phaggotry (or rather, admonish people for pointing his phaggotry out) on quite a few occasions, so I figured you might want to know that what Surtur does and what those who shit down the front of his pants on his dick do are not equivalent young man. 👆

i totally missed this post until just now. not lying just to repost it on the next page. no sir.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol wow, you know what? Okay. I'm sure the answers won't be satisfactory to you, but you asked.

Keep in mind some of the "facts" apply to multiple posters here. Should I address those too? Or just the ones that specifically apply to me? Ah you know what, I'll do both.

Instead of typing out this sad diatribe saying how you'll refute the points, you could have just refuted the points, sport.

So let's break this imbeciles post down.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Surtur spends inordinate amounts of his time actively looking for SJW/liberal stories to post and mock.

No more time than dipshits spend on here scouring SJW threads to find something to nitpick or drawing out silly arguments for 10 pages. So, I feel like what this person just typed is not something that separates me from anyone else. Next.

He literally has an app that he dedicates to finding these stories for him. He actively asserts that shit like the democrats singing some stupid song is going to be a big deal to people next election, presumably because it will be a big deal to him.

This is a lie. I already refuted that. There is no app I have programmed to dedicate to search for SJW stuff. My phone shows me tons of different stories, and yes it will recommend shit based on stuff I've seen, but I do not go scouring places, I open up the app and...scroll down. Hell, you have an option with this app to tag an article for "read later'. I have no way to prove this, but about 75% of my articles I marked for read later are not SJW stories.

In fact the one website I did make it so the app feeds me stuff from has nothing to do with SJW's. The site is Kotaku, in case you needed that information. So next.

(presumably by Bill himself because his beliefs have changed?)

The science hasn't changed, next.

is "not trivial", which is to say it's an important issue.

So again, no. For me, there is a wide gap between "not trivial" and world shattering events. The suggestion is that because I come to a mostly dead board and don't immerse myself in serious political discussion that...the stuff I talk about is super important and earth shattering.

He actively responds to criticisms of Trump or of the right with various things Hillary or some other leftist did, though he never does this when someone makes a post out of nowhere shitting on Hillary or the left.

Which again, Nemebro is describing behavior that applies to multiple posters. He is talking about deflecting, and yeah we have a whole bunch of folk who deflect.

By comparison, those who shit on him just have to come here to read his posts and make a quick response.

Again: this is just plain not true at all Robby Rob. Those who come to shit on me need just make a quick response? No, you know very well that isn't always the case. On top of that, you also know that there is never just usually one quick response, but pages and pages of it.

So here is your pal spouting bullshit in order to try to downplay how you guys behave.

There's an enormous difference in effort lad.

No, not that you've shown.

I've seen you try to defend Surtur's phaggotry (or rather, admonish people for pointing his phaggotry out) on quite a few occasions, so I figured you might want to know that what Surtur does and what those who shit down the front of his pants on his dick do are not equivalent young man. 👆

Which again: nothing this person just type rings the whole "these others are not equivalent" stuff.

Of course the problem here is...it would take self awareness, it would take Rob and others like him to be able to admit to the bullshit they do too, but they never do, they just use excuses. This will not meet your criteria of "facts" because you clearly seem to feel you do not behave the way I've called out. So this was probably a wasted effort, but meh.

Originally posted by Robtard
Instead of typing out this sad diatribe saying how you'll refute the points, you could have just refuted the points, sport.

he's hyping up his impending end-argument with a promo

let me tell you something brother. i'm gonna type up a post that crushes all your arguments. it's gonna be a massacre and you'll never be able to form a reasonable retort when i'm done with you. so whatchoo gonna do brother? whatchoo gonna do when surt-a-mania, and all the little surt-a-maniacs, run wild on YOU!!!!

No not hyping it up, I guess it was pointing out I already knew it would be a wasted effort given how you and Rob behave.

I mean, your whole "enforced" definition fiasco tells me that much, and Rob staying silent about it and using strawmans about Jim Crow and colored only water fountains speaks volumes as well.

So again, not expecting much.

Originally posted by Surtur
But he really didn't.
Opinions vary, some would say your last two pages of posts seem desperate and you want to "save face", I'm not saying that of course.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Opinions vary, some would say your last two pages of posts seem desperate and you want to "save face", I'm not saying that of course.

Or I'm just correcting a troll, and a lot of the shit Nemebro said either wasn't a fact or it applies to multiple people.

I commented on Nemebro's post once, saw imbeciles posting more, so commented more. If for no reason I just kept continually posting going "no guys really, he's wrong I swear" you'd have perhaps something resembling a point. Not what happened though.

But you are right this is about opinion, and so I don't expect much. It would require Rob and others to be honest about themselves.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Opinions vary, some would say your last two pages of posts seem desperate and you want to "save face", I'm not saying that of course.

Bingo

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he's hyping up his impending end-argument with a promo

let me tell you something brother. i'm gonna type up a post that crushes all your arguments. it's gonna be a massacre and you'll never be able to form a reasonable retort when i'm done with you. so whatchoo gonna do brother? whatchoo gonna do when surt-a-mania, and all the little surt-a-maniacs, run wild on YOU!!!!

I laughed. Spot on hulkster

So I comment on the original comment about me. Say nothing more until others bring it up again, claiming he really "got me". I comment on that. Then I am asked to refute his points, I do so.

Now it is "wow, you're just trying to save face".

If you were trolling you should have just told me.

Originally posted by Surtur
Or I'm just correcting a troll, and a lot of the shit Nemebro said either wasn't a fact or it applies to multiple people.

I commented on Nemebro's post once, saw imbeciles posting more, so commented more. If for no reason I just kept continually posting going "no guys really, he's wrong I swear" you'd have perhaps something resembling a point. Not what happened though.

But you are right this is about opinion, and so I don't expect much. It would require Rob and others to be honest about themselves.

Chill bra, you are taking everything way too seriously. Your posts are probably read by half a dozen to a dozen people at best, I don't know or care who you really are. You haven't lost any e-cred.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Chill bra, you are taking everything way too seriously. Your posts are probably read by half a dozen to a dozen people at best, I don't know or care who you really are. You haven't lost any e-cred.

#Don'tTreadOnMyCred