Originally posted by SurturYour vote doesn't only effect you, it effects everyone. So when you vote for destruction and regression, I think it's fair for all the people getting fuked to demand an explanation.
I think it's up to each individual on whether or not they want to defend their choice to others. My problem comes with the fact that you are acting as if people *owe* you an explanation for why they voted the way they did.
Originally posted by Firefly218
Your vote doesn't only effect you, it effects everyone. So when you vote for destruction and regression, I think it's fair for all the people getting fuked to demand an explanation.
I disagree, a person doesn't owe you anything when it comes to how they voted. Going by your logic, how far would you take it? What if a person doesn't want to even reveal who they voted for, is that information also owed to you?