Manchester terror attack- 19 dead, 50 wounded

Started by Bashar Teg20 pages

Originally posted by Surtur

You know the drill.

#NotAllMuslims

Declare a day of mourning.

Time to order some flowers.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What a truly dumb thing to say when the victims are all Muslims.

By the way, shall I start posting

#NotAllWesterners

every time a US bomb is thrown in Syria or Iraq killing innocents

Originally posted by Surtur
I agree the hashtag is a dumb thing to say, whether the victims are Muslims or not.

wow another clever little stunt.

#NotAllMuslims

But who am I referring to, the potential victims, the ISIS bomber or the Muslim man who gave his life stopping him:

http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq/

Originally posted by Darth Thor
#NotAllMuslims

But who am I referring to, the potential victims, the ISIS bomber or the Muslim man who gave his life stopping him:

http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq/

You're referring to the strawman argument that suggests a majority of people blame all muslims for terror attacks.

So no praise for the Muslim who gave his life stopping a Suicide Attacker?

Figures.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So no praise for the Muslim who gave his life stopping a Suicide Attacker?

Figures.

Yeah, it was mighty noble of you to use the same sacrifice as part of your petty sarcastic reply earlier. Please spare me the false indignity.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah, it was mighty noble of you to use the same sacrifice as part of your petty sarcastic reply earlier. Please spare me the false indignity.

and still you deflect and refuse to even acknowledge the guy's sacrifice. just because of his religion.
what a petty, shallow, and hateful little man you are. ❌

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and still you deflect and refuse to even acknowledge the guy's sacrifice. just because of his religion.
what a petty, shallow, and hateful little man you are. ❌

Lol I like how calling out someone elses bullshit now equates to "you are refusing to acknowledge a guys sacrifice because of his religion".

Of course just the fact that I referred to the sacrifice of the guy is acknowledging it, but okay: the guy sacrificed himself and it was a good deed and it is quite sad and unfortunate he is dead.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh look, time-waster is trying to argue naked bigotry as a valid approach to debate. this should be good eat

This was truly a hilarious response to the hypocrisy being pointed out. I like how your new tactic seems to be to pretend you suddenly became a debate monitor or something 👆

debate monitor? because i mocked someone's bigoted statement? explain. eat

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
debate monitor? because i mocked someone's bigoted statement? explain. eat

It wasn't just that one specific response of yours, this is why I talked about this being a new tactic. You continually talk about debating protocol and even rules at times now.

Originally posted by Surtur
It wasn't just that one specific response of yours, this is why I talked about this being a new tactic. You continually talk about debating protocol and even rules at times now.

because logic and reason as just liberal tricks.

No logic and reason is a social construct made to oppress minorities LGBT and women.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
debate monitor? because i mocked someone's bigoted statement? explain. eat

'All bigots hate it when you call them bigot'

Originally posted by Emperordmb
No logic and reason is a social construct made to oppress minorities LGBT and women.

👆

Originally posted by Surtur
👆

glorious comeback

anyway i'll do my best to resist the temptation to push my logic/reason-based liberal trickery on you. pinky-swear.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah, it was mighty noble of you to use the same sacrifice as part of your petty sarcastic reply earlier. Please spare me the false indignity.

I have praised him on my Facebook as a Real Jihadist.

And just me posting it here is praising him, and yes I was simultaneously proving how bigots will ignore this in favour of their agenda to tell the world of "Islamist terrorism"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and still you deflect and refuse to even acknowledge the guy's sacrifice. just because of his religion.
what a petty, shallow, and hateful little man you are. ❌

I have a feeling if the guy wasn't a Muslim then Surtur would have immediately been praising him and cursing Muslims for his death.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I have praised him on my Facebook as a Real Jihadist.

And just me posting it here is praising him, and yes I was simultaneously proving how bigots will ignore this in favour of their agenda to tell the world of "Islamist terrorism"

I have a feeling if the guy wasn't a Muslim then Surtur would have immediately been praising him and cursing Muslims for his death.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Well having read a few more comments than you, I quoted you and Surtur and then defended that argument because of what was said before.

As for "Equated My Religion", looks like I was spot on about you taking it a bit personally.

Actually not all society was shitty at that time period. Muslims were overall quite civilized. I suggest you watch "Kingdom of Heaven" for a small dose of the history of those times.

Again you're equating everything to the "Catholic Church" of the time, and how since that's improved Christianity and Christians have somehow evolved. But did the Catholics following the Church at that time have no brain of their own to think about what they were doing? Did they not stop to think when they were murdering children and raping women, that maybe Jesus wouldn't be happy with this.

Actually no, most Catholics at the time DIDN'T have brains of their own. Most couldn't read at all and even the ones who could were unable to read religious texts because they existed only in Latin within the church. All the people at the time knew about the faith as a whole was what their resident priest(s) told them. And even those local priests themselves had their knowledge of the faith limited by the availability of the texts themselves. The modern version of the bible wasn't assembled and recognized by the majority of the faith until the 1500s.

TIL: Christians of long ago just didn't know that 'murdering children and raping women' was a no-no in the eyes of Jesus

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: Christians of long ago just didn't know that 'murdering children and raping women' was a no-no in the eyes of Jesus

Really? You didn't know that common folk of the middle ages didn't discriminate all that much by age or sex when it came to killing? They killed their own children for things they considered blasphemous, nevermind the children of those they considered to be Heathens. I'd wager that Jesus saying that children should be treated as one would treat him didn't get played up that much in church sermons.

All of the major religions start out really good in early days(which is why they gain ground in the first place). Then they become really zealous, take everything as literal, and think they're better than everybody else. Then they see reason and start to temper their beliefs/expectations a bit. Relatively speaking, Islam is still somewhat young compared to Christianity. It's still going through it's "teenager" phase when it's got a bunch of hormone induced rage going on inside and wants to force everyone else to agree with it lol.