More news about Leftist Progressives's getting their NAZI on.
It's a start:
Rolling Stone to Pay UVA Frat $1.65 Million in Settlement of Rape Hoax Suit
They need to give out the name of this "Jackie" girl who made all this up though.
Anyways, stupid crazy leftists are stupid and crazy:
Critics: New Names for Gentrifying NYC Neighborhoods ‘Almost Like a Klu Klux Klan-Veiled Attack’
Anyways, it's good to see this leftist cuck starting to un-cuck himself a bit:
Evergreen State President Grows Some Balls, Says Some Protesters May Be Punished
Of course saying "some could be punished" is a lot different than doing it.
Anyways, Cucks across the pond:
Oxford Rewrites History Exam to Make it Easier for Women to Get Top Grades
"An Oxford spokesman acknowledged that “the gender gap was a consideration” when making the change, but said timed exams will still be an “important” part of the course."
Nothing to see here folks, just more insanity:
Liberals triggered by Sessions ‘mansplaining’ to Democrat Kamala Harris
Originally posted by Robtard
'The media" is pointing out that Sessions refused to answer questions while not invoking executive privilege, which is an issue; or normally would be.
It is not "an issue," it is contempt of Congress. One must invoke executive privilege or the fifth amendment, or answer the question. Those are the only legal options.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Wow, almost as if she were questioning him or something. 😐
And a great way to get an answer from somebody would be...to let that person actually answer a question. You're not allowed to cut off the witness in an attempt to place him under perjury charges. She'll try to cut him off before he could actually answer so she could catch him in a perjury trap because a qualified statement would not be grounds for perjury but a nonqualified statement might be.
Originally posted by Robtard
'The media" is pointing out that Sessions refused to answer questions while not invoking executive privilege, which is an issue; or normally would be.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is not "an issue," it is contempt of Congress. One must invoke executive privilege or the fifth amendment, or answer the question. Those are the only legal options.
If you are asked a question in an open hearing, and you don't know if the president has invoked executive privilege (you don't have time to call him up on his cell phone and ask), you have to take your best stab and say he doesn't know whether Trump would invoke executive privilege on this question, he hasn't gone over every question ever with Trump, so he's not going to answer that question. Instead you just say that he can't answer the question because Trump might have invoked executive privilege. That's what Sessions said.
This is not stonewalling. He's invoking DOJ rules which do exist.
Originally posted by ESB -1138
If you are asked a question in an open hearing, and you don't know if the president has invoked executive privilege (you don't have time to call him up on his cell phone and ask), you have to take your best stab and say he doesn't know whether Trump would invoke executive privilege on this question, he hasn't gone over every question ever with Trump, so he's not going to answer that question. Instead you just say that he can't answer the question because Trump might have invoked executive privilege. That's what Sessions said.This is not stonewalling. He's invoking DOJ rules which do exist.
Your reason amounts to Sessions not being prepared. Pretty sure that isn't a valid excuse in a congressional hearing. At least it normally wouldn't be.