Oh Leftist Progressives....

Originally posted by Surtur
Just out of curiosity, do you feel the "Oh conservatives" thread is an anti-right circle jerk?

of course it's a circlejerk. what's your point?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
of course it's a circlejerk. what's your point?

Was just curious if he'd be consistent. People here on the left so rarely are.

Originally posted by Surtur
Was just curious if he'd be consistent. People here on the left so rarely are.

cant speak for anyone but myself, but i would assume that the continued existance of this thread would signify that circlejerks are not forbidden here. so again, what's your point?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
cant speak for anyone but myself, but i would assume that the continued existance of this thread would signify that circlejerks are not forbidden here. so again, what's your point?

I never said he implied a "circle jerk" was forbidden. Merely curious if he'd correctly label both threads or tow the liberal line and come up with an excuse.

You're once again imagining things that didn't happen and applying them to liberals to get worked up over. At least stick to real things to get worked up over like ball-pits in classrooms and puppies on campuses. Go!

With Leftist Progressives the only type of Sexual Practice that is frowned upon is Married Heterosexual. They hate that shit.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're once again imagining things that didn't happen and applying them to liberals to get worked up over. At least stick to real things to get worked up over like ball-pits in classrooms and puppies on campuses. Go!

As I said, just curious if this person would apply correct labels.

Originally posted by Surtur
As I said, just curious if this person would apply correct labels.

are you sure you're not just pretending to be a victim (again), when nobody's right to circlejerk was impeded upon?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
are you sure you're not just pretending to be a victim (again), when nobody's right to circlejerk was impeded upon?

I am absolutely sure, again: just curious if this person is consistent.

Pretty sure the point of closing the thread was that you don't need two that basically serve the same function.

Originally posted by BackFire
Indeed. This is the new anti lef circle jerk thread. Enjoy your time.

I'm not anti-left, I'm anti a particular strain of left-wingers and I don't think the specific points made on that thread were attacks on the left as a whole.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Pretty sure the point of closing the thread was that you don't need two that basically serve the same function.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
forcing a migration

oh gaaaawd

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If that was the case then keep the more established thread instead of forcing a migration to another thread.

Like BF said, the other one had run its course. Sometimes you need to cut loose the older thread to... Freshen it up, as it were.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Like BF said, the other one had run its course. Sometimes you need to cut loose the older thread to... Freshen it up, as it were.

Indeed and yet we have a Trump presidency thread, which surely any questions of impeachment would fall under such a thing and yet...

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed and yet we have a Trump presidency thread, which surely any questions of impeachment would fall under such a thing and yet...

Not entirely sure what you're getting at. Are you asking to merge the Impeachment thread with the presidency thread?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Not entirely sure what you're getting at. Are you asking to merge the Impeachment thread with the presidency thread?

We have an impeachment thread too, both open.

Originally posted by Surtur
We have an impeachment thread too, both open.

I edited.

But I dunno, tbh. Backfire is the one you'd have to ask.

I'm not asking for anything, just making an observation.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If that was the case then keep the more established thread instead of forcing a migration to another thread.

It's cool, now they can't whine about thread titles.

Now for something funny:

Hillary makes a new accusation in the election conspiracy theory

It's like she can't help herself.

I still wanna know how the Russians made her run a toxic campaign and especially how they kept her out of Wisconsin. You think force field technology played a role?

Gotta also love the latest insult against Trump, the "Chess vs checkers" stuff pseudo-intellectuals use to sound smart.