Originally posted by Sable
You do realize that was an ice shelf, with no ground under neither it whatsoever ever. He hit one area and it caused the whole ice shelf to collapse.
That ice mass was capable of supporting running frost giants and their giant monsters. It's not like our modern streets aren't hollowed underneath with sewers.
Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!!!
You are denying this?
Originally posted by Sable
Oh so you know what I'm talking about. In The other thread you suggested he was tougher then adamentium. You just proved yourself wrong.
1. I never suggested he was tougher than adamantium. You really need to stop making stuff up. You have a really nasty habit of lying.
2. How exactly did I prove myself wrong?
3. Do you agree then that Thor looked winded because of getting stabbed instead of being tired from generating lightning?
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. I never suggested he was tougher than adamantium. You really need to stop making stuff up. You have a really nasty habit of lying.2. How exactly did I prove myself wrong?
3. Do you agree then that Thor looked winded because of getting stabbed instead of being tired from generating lightning?
You literally said Thor was tougher then adamentium. As for lying, you keep changing your story on feats, that's lying.
Originally posted by Sable
You literally said Thor was tougher then adamentium. As for lying, you keep changing your story on feats, that's lying.
Weird. Pretty sure this was what I said:
Originally posted by FrothByte
I never said that Asgardians or Asgardian steel is tougher than Adamantium. My claim was that it's also foolish to assume that adamantium is tougher than Asgardian or Asgardian steel.
Are you going to admit that you were mistaken?
Originally posted by Silent Master
1) Why are you assuming the arc reactor absorbed the energy and not the suit?2) You're forgetting that he also had to use the original arc reactor to power his new suit in the final battle of Iron-man 1, so weight or efficiency had little to nothing to do with it.
3) The 3 gigajoules per second was from his original reactor, his new ones are literally thousands of times more powerful.
1. Possibly
2. I don't understand. We're both suits were shown to give only 15 minutes before completely running out of juice using the same arc? Or was it just the first suit you get the 15 minutes from?
3. Let's say his new suit can last 24 hours. This is 96 times longer than 15 minutes. So it's not thousands of times more powerful.
Originally posted by FrothByteA lightning strike lasts from 10 to 50 microseconds. The Jotunheim strike lasted for seconds and thus having tens of thousands (at least) more energy.
Also, regular lightning is not capable of destroying acres of land mass like Thor's Jotunheim strike.
Thor absorbed lightning many seconds (using the building as a conduit) when he hit the leviathan. Remember a lightning strike lasts thousands of times less than any of Thor's Lightning feats.
Originally posted by h1a8
A lightning strike lasts from 10 to 50 microseconds. The Jotunheim strike lasted for seconds and thus having tens of thousands (at least) more energy.
And plus it was a domino effect. Destroying a critical area caused the whole shelf to collapse.Thor absorbed lightning many seconds (using the building as a conduit) when he hit the leviathan. Remember a lightning strike lasts thousands of times less than any of Thor's Lightning feats.
IOW, Thor's lightning was at the very least tens of thousands of times stronger than a lightning strike.
Originally posted by h1a8
1. Possibly
2. I don't understand. We're both suits were shown to give only 15 minutes before completely running out of juice using the same arc? Or was it just the first suit you get the 15 minutes from?
3. Let's say his new suit can last 24 hours. This is 96 times longer than 15 minutes. So it's not thousands of times more powerful.
You seriously need to watch the movie, Iron-man basically drained the original arc reactor dry just flying across a city and having a short fight with the Iron-Monger.