Wonder Woman & Superman Vs Thor & Hulk

Started by Sable6 pages

You keep saying dodged, you dodged my entire post in the other thread detailing how wrong you are. This is called hypocrisy, do you know what that means, look it up. LOL

Originally posted by Sable
You keep saying dodged, you dodged my entire post in the other thread detailing how wrong you are. This is called hypocrisy, do you know what that means, look it up. LOL

Stick to the topic kid. Leave the conversation we have on a different thread alone. Now address my post properly. Were you or were you not mistaken on what you claimed I said?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Stick to the topic kid. Leave the conversation we have on a different thread alone. Now address my post properly. Were you or were you not mistaken on what you claimed I said?

Kid? I am older then you. No, you claimed I dodged, when you dodge yourself, thats hypocrisy. You been here doing this for 13 years? What a waste of time, getting up upset over comic debate, you must really have a big ego to stick around that long defending your honor.

Originally posted by Sable
Kid? I am older then you. No, you claimed I dodged, when you dodge yourself, thats hypocrisy. You been here doing this for 13 years? What a waste of time, getting up upset over comic debate, you must really have a big ego to stick around that long defending your honor.

Considering how often I've caught you lying I'm inclined to think you're probably lying about whatever age you think you are. Fact is, you're acting like a kid so you'll be called a kid. A real adult would man-up (or woman-up) and admit that they were mistaken when confronted with irrefutable proof that they misrepresented someone's words.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Considering how often I've caught you lying I'm inclined to think you're probably lying about whatever age you think you are. Fact is, you're acting like a kid so you'll be called a kid. A real adult would man-up (or woman-up) and admit that they were mistaken when confronted with irrefutable proof that they misrepresented someone's words.

Which is why I started posting Smilies, I figured that was about the level of his understanding.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Considering how often I've caught you lying I'm inclined to think you're probably lying about whatever age you think you are. Fact is, you're acting like a kid so you'll be called a kid. A real adult would man-up (or woman-up) and admit that they were mistaken when confronted with irrefutable proof that they misrepresented someone's words.

Nothing you presented as proof is irrefutable. Who made you the authority? Im wiling to start over if you drop this complex maneuver bs.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, Thor's lightning was at the very least tens of thousands of times stronger than a lightning strike.
Possibly but I already stated that it should be because of the time Thor took to absorb the lightning from the sky.

My argument is that Thor's Lightning is similar or weaker than real lightning. If real lightning struck something for more than 3 seconds then it would too be tens of thousands of times more powerful.

So Thor lightning is basic sky lightning but only more of it. The quality of it (substance) is exactly the same as normal lightning.