Originally posted by Surtur
It doesn't have to be said. Just like the guy in Portland who killed those people was said to be a Trumper and then whoops, he's a Bernie supporter.
It's obviously meant to smear the people who jump the gun in calling people who do bad shit Trump supporters.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Really? This is the comment that's supposedly smearing Bernie?It's obviously meant to smear the people who jump the gun in calling people who do bad shit Trump supporters.
They needed an excuse to grasp at straws, plus I think Rob wanted a reason to say "not on my watch" multiple times.
Remember the excuse is that he was immediately labeled a Trump supporter because he apparently appeared at a Trump rally, though I've seen reports that he was shouting at people on both sides and was even asked to leave one of the rallies. But this would involve selective research. Highlighting the stuff that apparently connects him to Trump, but not mentioning his support of someone who definitely isn't Trump.
In truth he seems like a white supremacist ready to shout down anyone who doesn't go along with his extremist views. And since, contrary to popular belief, a majority of Trump supporters are not white supremacists...this guy had issues on both sides.
You can find a LOT of asian generalities.. From liberals and conservatives both.
Native Americans also seem to be an "acceptable target of ignorance". Sure, there's the sports teams names, but they're still nowhere near the "don't touch this with a 10 foot pole" status of other class's.
It's funny how bigoted statements against asians or Native Americans aren't treated nearly the same as other statements.. Best reason I can tell, is:
1. No rich asians/native americans form groups to lobby against it. Leading to:
2. Nothing for media consumption = no one cares.
Baaically, all sjw issues happen because some rich guys make good content for the news, which people eat up. More or less. Newsmen aren't gonna dig into this stuff themselves, someone has to hand it to them on a silver platter. And people are too complacent/stupid to think about something they haven't had drilled into them from.an outside source.. (Like "bigotry against asians are bad" isn't even on most people's radar the way gay/black/jewish bigotry is. Kind of sad even sjw's naturally compartmentalize bigotry based on social identity..)
Originally posted by Surtur
They needed an excuse to grasp at straws, plus I think Rob wanted a reason to say "not on my watch" multiple times.Remember the excuse is that he was immediately labeled a Trump supporter because he apparently appeared at a Trump rally, though I've seen reports that he was shouting at people on both sides and was even asked to leave one of the rallies. But this would involve selective research. Highlighting the stuff that apparently connects him to Trump, but not mentioning his support of someone who definitely isn't Trump.
In truth he seems like a white supremacist ready to shout down anyone who doesn't go along with his extremist views. And since, contrary to popular belief, a majority of Trump supporters are not white supremacists...this guy had issues on both sides.
This post, you're taking what I explained to you on the previous page, adding a bit of spin and passing it off as your own. Lol, Not. On. My. Watch, sport.
Originally posted by Surtur
Saying "many conservatives are bigots" is in itself a bigoted statement. It was a nice try to suggest otherwise, and hilarious to boot.
no, it's a factual statement. a substantial group within the right are racist. thus "many".
to say "most" would be an overgeneralization and kinda bigoted, "all" would just be poor form indeed, but 'many' is just a fact. your feels do not factor into facts and reasoning.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no, it's a factual statement. a substantial group within the right are racist. thus "many".to say "most" would be an overgeneralization and kinda bigoted, "all" would just be poor form indeed, but 'many' is just a fact. your feels do not factor into facts and reasoning.
Lol it's not a factual statement, it's a bigoted statement. This is not up for debate, so did you have anything else you'd like to add?
Btw I do love how you danced around it. To say "all" would be bigoted, as would "most", but "many"? Pshhh, no. Do you even read the shit you type anymore? But alas as I said: this isn't even debatable. It was a bigoted statement. If it hurts your fee fee's for your pals bigotry to get called out? Irrelevant.
Originally posted by cdtm
I don't have a problem with that.Of course, it's also true there are many bigoted liberals out there. 👆
Ah, but see what you just did? You implied the liberals could be just as bad. That's not good enough. They need to live under this illusion(more like delusion) they are superior. That's why you just had some genius come say it's a fact that most conservatives are racist.
EDIT: Oh sorry not "most", that would be bigoted. He said many. Despite the fact that to me the word "many" implies a majority and saying a majority of conservatives are bigots is still bigoted, but hey logic.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nope. your feefees just dont matter surt. but have fun playing pretend like a manbaby.
Fee's fee's do not matter, this is true. Facts like your pal is a bigot are what matter.
I know it sucks, the intent of this thread was to whine about others racism/bigotry...I doubt he intended his own bigotry to get called out. But it's also kinda funny.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
then you're too dumb to comprehend simple words that a child should understand. not surprising.
You're too stupid to see the bigotry of your pal, so it's probably best for you to keep comments about the intellect of others to a minimum.
Just to note though: you've kinda lost all room to whine about Trumpers who never wanna admit Trump did anything wrong.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i'd feel deeply embarrassed if i didn't know the difference between 'many' and 'most'. especially after my first grade teacher explained quite thoroughly.
I'd feel deeply embarrassed if I tried to use the bullshit excuses you're trying to use right now.
Are you too much of a coward to admit it's bigoted? Or do you just wanna double down on this "many" vs "most" bullshit?
Since yes, to suggest a large number of conservatives are all racist or bigoted under the surface is a bigoted statement lol.