Darwinian evolution can not be proven. There is actual proof that Jesus exists. Since Darwinian evolution can not be proven, because it is not observable. So why do you believe in it? Is it blind faith? Of course it is, because Darwinian evolution isn’t an actual science, it’s a faith based myth. I know for example that everything was created, because you simply will never get something from nothin. A bird is never going to change into a human, nor will bacteria turn into a bird.
Why did Ken Ham destroy Bill Nye? Zero observable evidence supports evolution, which renders evolution to be nothing more than nonsense. We can’t even prove the actual age of the Earth. What happens is that we predict. Give me one shred of evidence that human kind evolved from a different kind of primate than what we currently are? Just one. How can you if biologist majors can not? It’s pure fantasy. If not, then give me one example of a kind of animal, be it bacteria, bird, cat, fish monkey, or human kind that has changed into a completely different kind.
Live science says of Darwinian evolution: It can turn dinosaurs into birds, apes into human, and amphibious mammals into whales.
What observable proof exists that this is true? No one seems to be able to answer this question, because it does not exist. Alligators said to be one of the oldest living kinds of animals have not really changed. The only change recorded was that they’ve gotten smaller. How is that evolution and not adaptation?
“We are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that’s too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on. - Richard Dawkins.
“We see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of ages…” - Charles Darwin. <— Idiot.
You have the canine kind, the feline kind, and human kind.
So Darwin said that there would be a change of kind over many years, so can anyone give an example of observable evidence of a change of kinds?
Nope, and you never will. So again, what is that called? Blind faith?
“Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.” - Richard Dawkins.
The theory of Evolution is based upon faith though Mr. Dawkins. Why? Because there is no observable evidence to support this idiotic notion that Darwin suggested. What a clown he was, am I correct? Of course I am.
Hey Mr. Dawkins, do you believe in intelligent design? Of course he doesn’t, because no one observed it so it has to be driven by faith right Richard Dawkins? Well Mr. Dawkins, I’d like you to make me a rose. Wait a second, perhaps roses evolved from mosquitoes.
Why isn’t Intelligent Design taught in universities, according to Physicist Victor J Stenger. “The legal staff of the Freedom From Religion Foundation (a church-state watchdog group) has had remarkable success in convincing many institutions, such as school boards and town councils that they are breaking constitutional law when they sponsor sectarian activities (sectarian means denoting or concerning a sect or sects.) that includes intelligent design. When the authorities can’t be convinced, Freedom From Religion sues, and it wins more often than not.
Victor Stenger, Physicist, PHD. “Does Academic Freedom Give Professors the right to teach whatever they want?” Huffington Post, May 25, 2013.
Isaac Newton said “This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.” - Isaac Newton.
Was Abraham Lincoln an Atheist? Well good ole Abe said “I know the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer, that I and this nation should be on the Lord’s side.”
What did Carl Sagan say? “ I am agnostic.”
Mark Twain said “ None of us can be as great as God, but any of us can be as good.”
Benjamin Franklin said “God governs in the affairs of men.”
Thomas Edison said “There is a great directing head of people and things… a supreme being who looks after the destinies of the world.”
Thomas Jefferson said “Say nothing of my religion, it is known to myself and my God alone.”
Albert Einstein said “The creator was unknowable. In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human understanding, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is is no God. But, what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.” Looks like good ole Albert believed in God. He categorically stated that “I am not an Atheist.” And when referring to those who deny the creator he used the term “Fanatical Atheists.”
Charles Darwin said. “I have never been an Atheist.”
Ernest Hemingway the only Atheist of the lot, according to his biographer in 1961, “Hemingway pushed two shells into the twelve gauge Boss shotgun…, put the end of the barrel into his mouth, pulled the trigger and blew out his brains.”
“Any fetus is less human than an adult pig.” -Richard Dawkins. <— idiot.
Who reading this question believe that they are good people? Have you ever lied? Have you ever thought of sleeping with a beautiful member of whatever sex even though they were married? Have you ever stolen anything? Have you ever cheated? Have you ever used God’s name in vain? That’s called blasphemy. Many have died for committing such offenses. Do you still think that you are a good person?
Does good and evil exist? If you do not believe that they do, do you believe that there is nothing wrong with rape? Murder? Theft? Where do we draw the line?
You don’t have to believe in anything, but there are certain rules that if violated will land you in jail. Still in disbelief? Do you want to begin gaslighting me over the obvious? Ignorance of the law is no excuse, so blasphemy does exist even if you do not believe in God.
Jesus said that if you look at a woman with lust in your heart, you’ve committed adultery. Has anyone reading this ever lusted over another person? If so you’ve broken a law of the Ten Commandments.
Evolution allows you to shirk your moral accountability, which is why so many people cling to the idea that we are just animals while ignoring the fact that we have a moral compass. The Bible says that we as people love the dark over the light. We despise being held accountable for our misdeeds when caught in the act. Jesus said there are none that are good.
Creation is proof of a creator.
When those that are interested in the strong possibility that the theory of evolution is actually science fiction, google actual observational evidence like ancient Chariot wheels that were found in the depths of the Red Sea, or sulphur balls of Sodom and Gomorrah. That's real evidence for you. Neanderthal man was said to have been an old man with arthritis. Lucy is believed to be a large chimp, and the rest of those idiotic fossils were hoaxes. It's obvious that the govts around the world have a specific narrative to peddle to those that are soft headed and trusting enough to subscribe to the notion that one kind can transform into a completely different kind.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
...
Kind of weird that chimps still exist today. Could it be that the apes were designed after their kind like whales and every other species that were designed after their own kind? If not, then why haven't they changed? Why don't they walk upright like us? Do you suspect that one day they'll take over as the architects, doctors, electricians, carpenters, soldiers, etc? Out of every career listed; the apes as of this moment of their evolutionary cycle, would only be capable of being a soldier. Note that any physically relevant canine is capable of following orders. We have more in common with apes than with canine species is the assumption that has been pushed. Genetically speaking under the microscope they discovered that we have more in common with certain families of banana trees, than we do with our so called closest relative.
There has never been any observational evidence used to support anything more than adaptations seen in many of todays surviving animal populations. I totally believe in adaptations. However, we are talking about evolution not adaptation. I'd like for anyone out there willing, if they could provide just 3 examples of a kind turning into another kind. I mean, can you give me just 1? They're even calling the chicken a T Rex. So although I can believe that chickens may be in the same family as T-Rex I have no evidence to support this, because no studies have been done to prove this notion.
Camels and Lamas are able to produce offspring showing that they are the same kind. Humans and Apes on the other hand can not produce offspring. They tried. Evolution does nothing but embolden the racist. It's pure science fiction. Adaptation is not, adaptation is real.
We simply were never apes, just like chimps and other apes will never be human.
Prove me wrong.
Originally posted by Stoic
We simply were never apes, just like chimps and other apes will never be human.Prove me wrong.
Lol.. I don't have to. Chromosome 2 and endogenous retroviruses (among other things) already did. Look em up. And I don't mean look up some handwaving away by your go-to apologist. Look it up and ACTUALLY try to understand it.
The "llamas and camels" is both a terrible and truly dishonest argument. They're very closely related. But not surprised a creationist made it.
A closer comparison would be modern humans (US) mating with Neanderthals, which did happen, because the species separation isn't that great, time-line wise, compared to when species branches happened.
Originally posted by Robtard
The "llamas and camels" is both a terrible and truly dishonest argument. They're very closely related. But not surprised a creationist made it.A closer comparison would be modern humans (US) mating with Neanderthals, which did happen, because the species separation isn't that great, time-line wise, compared to when species branches happened.
You're an idiot. Are we not said to be closely related to apes? Just be quiet idiot