Originally posted by -K-M-At this point? Nothing, lol.
I don't even know what's even being debated anymore
The Hulkamaniacs have absolutely NO evidence to support Rulk winning...So they reverted to posting Hulk feats...Then Skaar feats...Then just randomly trolling when their BS was picked apart.
IOW, it's your typical Hulk-related thread. 👆
Originally posted by -K-M-
I don't even know what's even being debated anymoreOriginally posted by Galan007
At this point? Nothing, lol.The Hulkamaniacs have absolutely NO evidence to support Rulk winning...So they reverted to posting Hulk feats...Then Skaar feats...Then just randomly trolling when their BS was picked apart.
IOW, it's your typical Hulk-related thread. 👆
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Haha! You made a phallic reference when Abhi criticized your emphasis on collateral damage in that thread. Keep that on your mind much? 😘
See what I mean, Mungi? 😂
Everyone is a sock.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t627666.html#post15779498
So, unsurprisingly, it turns out I was right about who the Original Poster (OP) of the thread that inspired this one meant when he was asking about Red Hulk/Rulk.
He meant "Thunderbolt" Ross, much as I explained.
As for the issue Delta preoccupied himself with, I stand by it.
Most people participating in that thread probably did not realize Marvel Comics has apparently replaced Rulk with someone named Maverick until DarkSaint (DS) mentioned it on page 4. Not me, apparently not Damborgson, and not the original poster of that thread, either. The fact that DS had actually broached that topic before then does nothing to change the truth of what I wrote. He wrote it on page 1 and few people noticed. He wrote it on page 4, when "now" was when the thread was on page 4, and people DID notice it then. And Damborgson and myself responded accordingly:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why are we ignoring the fact that current Red Hulk, Robert Maverick, is nowhere near Loeb force Rulk???
Originally posted by Damborgson
They replaced Ross too?Thor, Cap, Iron Man, Wolverine, Hulk, Spiderman, Nova, Red Hulk, who else has been upstaged?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why are we ignoring the fact that current Red Hulk, Robert Maverick, is nowhere near Loeb force Rulk???
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Probably because most people, myself and Damborgson included, had no idea Ross had been replaced as Red Hulk until you brought it up here, now, on page 4 of this thread.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=643252&pagenumber=4
Originally posted by marcssands14
The red hulk that I'm talking about is Ross.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=643252&pagenumber=6#post16237019
Originally posted by Galan007
I'm still trying to figure out why some of these Rulk/Hulk fanatics are so desperately clinging to collateral damage like it's supposed to 'prove' something..? Since when did that become the end-all/be-all way to gauge a character's power ... ?
*Galactus busts through ALL of Thanos' shields' w/o causing hardly any damage to the room they were standing in.
Most of your examples seem to be of ray blasts, light, heat, energy, etcetera.
Both the ones I featured here below AND the ones I omitted.
These are things that generally are focused or concentrated to produce great intensity. They are essentially variations of Torch's concentration maneuver here at the behest of Spider-Man, the focusing of heat/light/energy, etcetera. Which neither in comics nor in real life is usually expected to do great harm to most of the surroundings:
Originally posted by -K-M-
I don't even know what's even being debated anymore
That's actually relatively easy, despite all the background noise.
I essentially want to know if Red Hulk as he debuted, roundabout 2008, would have defeated Doomsday as he debuted, roundabout 1993, if speed was not a factor and Rulk took Superman's place, or was put in some similar locale.
So far I am coming to the conclusion that Rulk would indeed win owing partly to his greater strength. In particular, on the last few pages, it's the fact that Rulk caused an earthquake measuring a full 9.0 on the Richter scale, and accidentally killed the people of a nearby and/or surrounding village by merely punching his opponent too hard.
By contrast, the blows Superman gave to Doomsday to finish DD do not seem to have caused proportionally many casualties, and the narration of the "sons of Krypton shaking the planet to the core" seem to be a much later retcon added years later to embellish the original Death of Superman tale.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
So, unsurprisingly, it turns out I was right about who the Original Poster (OP) of the thread that inspired this one meant when he was asking about Red Hulk/Rulk.He meant "Thunderbolt" Ross, much as I explained.
As for the issue Delta preoccupied himself with, I stand by it.
Most people participating in that thread probably did not realize Marvel Comics has apparently replaced Rulk with someone named Maverick until DarkSaint (DS) mentioned it on page 4. Not me, apparently not Damborgson, and not the original poster of that thread, either. The fact that DS had actually broached that topic before then does nothing to change the truth of what I wrote. He wrote it on page 1 and few people noticed. He wrote it on page 4, when "now" was when the thread was on page 4, and people DID notice it then. And Damborgson and myself responded accordingly:
What he means, and what others' (including yours) ignorance is, is nothing to do with me.
I am actually surprised, blue. Shocked, even. That you would hide behind the comfort of a groupthink mentality.
Forum rules are VERY clear. If OP does not specify, we divert to the most recent incarnation (which, if you re-read the thread, I was replying to carver, who WAS using the most recent incarnation).
OP coming back in a few days later (despite having logged in earlier) and clarifying, does NOTHING to alter the forum rules,does it?
It is very clear. We use the most recent incarnation, if the OP does not specify.
You being ignorant, or Damborgy being ignorant, or anyone else is, well....no defence. Neither is it my problem.
But to hide behind 'well, EVERYONE doing it!' is....disappointing.
Much as I said in my last post in the thread you're referring to:
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
There's no attempt to hide behind anything on my part.
You focus so much on being technically correct that you don't stop to consider whether you even understand who and/or what you're responding to.I figured a poster with the history of the OP probably meant Ross.
I was right.
For the record, though I was and am genuinely curious and probably would have made it anyway (note I already introduced a SHE-Rulk versus Doomsday thread years ago), addressing and correcting for your actions, of completely trampling what the original poster wanted us to discuss, was the deciding factor among several for my making the thread we're in.
And I have replied:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I understood perfectly well.Forum rules are clear. I came in, and posted a reply to carver who was using the most recent showings of Rulk. That was who I was responding to, on pg1, which you kept missing. Someone who professes to be knowledgeable in all things Hulk.
Again, your ignorance (which you tried to cover up by saying I hadn't mentioned it until page 4), Carver's ignorance, or OP's ignorance - none of that is my problem.
If you don't know, or are not up to speed with the characters you are supposed to be debating (just as I had to do so nearly 5 years ago, again on Rulk) then perhaps you should stay out of Rulk threads:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=569460&pagenumber=40Get up to speed with them first. Then debate.
