Are we seeing an end to the normalization of white nationalism?

Originally posted by Kjam
It's ironic when you consider that America has spent far longer waging war against communist movements than they ever did the Nazi's. That's revisionist history for you.

How about punching leftists whenever they rear their ugly little heads? If only literally.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
where's this basic human rights defense when surt's cheering violence against antifa? (another terrorist group which you never fail to condemn when the topic is raised). that goes for all of you silly ****s.

Originally posted by Surtur
If you're going to whine over tactics not being called out then it's best to have not been too cowardly to ever call out your buddies for it. And no, I don't mean "racism". I mean any shitty behavior.

So, grow some balls. Or certainly stop telling others to do so, you look idiotic.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
>X is presented that is opposed to Surt's worldview.
>(Optional) Surt attempts to dispute X unsuccessfully.
>Surt doubles down on a red herring of choice usually in the form of a question/demand that has little bearing on X.

Originally posted by Surtur
I do love how you guys whine I don't call something out, then I do call it out and....still asinine snotty comments lol.

Too funny. Don't worry, it won't happen again.

Seems like you're trying to scuttle the progress here. Still, I'm proud of you 👆 Let's move forward.

Originally posted by jaden101
How much of it do you actually experience on a day to day basis though. Seems to me a fair amount of the "alt-right" actually seek out examples of cvntish behaviour of supposed "lefties" and then whine about it.

It doesn't need to be sought out, they do it on their own.

Notice I don't have to seek out pathetic souls using "u mad bro" tactics?

In fact, notice the racist person can admit what he is, but these people lack the courage to admit their own shitty behavior?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I assumed he was referring to physically striking antifa members in self defense since that's the context I've seen them get physically struck in every one of those videos I've seen.

Shh, that would be logical and it wouldn't fit the narrative.

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems like you're trying to scuttle the progress here. Still, I'm proud of you 👆 Let's move forward.

I'm not trying to scuttle anything, merely pointing out it won't happen again.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not trying to scuttle anything, merely pointing out it won't happen again.

What won't happen again?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I assumed he was referring to physically striking antifa members in self defense since that's the context I've seen them get physically struck in every one of those videos I've seen.

Originally posted by Robtard
What won't happen again?

Originally posted by Robtard
What won't happen again?

If this person says racist things in the future I'm not going to be calling it out, is what I'm saying.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
which fallacy is that? the "i assumed that despite his words, he meant this other thing. therefore it is the other thing" fallacy. I forget.

You see what this person is doing is applying two things: common sense and memory. You see he is using his memory to recall that I have constantly criticized this group for their violence. He has seen me call them pussies for their violence.

So when he saw me saying I like seeing the pussies get beat...well, that's where the common sense came into play.

Originally posted by Surtur
If this person says racist things in the future I'm not going to be calling it out, is what I'm saying.

Genuinely curious: Do you think not calling out blatant racism again and sometimes cheerleading a blatant racist is a good idea?

Originally posted by Robtard
Genuinely curious: Do you think not calling out blatant racism again and sometimes cheerleading a blatant racist is a good idea?

Well I have never taken a racist comment and agreed. If the person says something else that I agree with I'm not going to pretend I don't. It wouldn't mean you agree with the persons entire world view.

It's not my job to continually call this person out, especially because other trolls want me to.

EDIT: Also here is the thing, if this is XYZ he has flat out told me in the past he's trolling you.

EDIT: Also here is the thing, if this is XYZ he has flat out told me in the past he's trolling you. [/B]

Wait, Kjam is that dumb ass Xyz? Lol, figures.

either him or some other jobless deviant kek-nazi drunkard following the same marching orders.

You ever notice the biggest sjw's on the left are all white guys?

There's a reason people complain about white people "hijacking" a movement.

TIL 'sjw' is a movement and ad hominem is a sound basis for logical argument. 🤪👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
xyz is a fascist pedophile. figures youd be bros. he cheerleaded you after all

I think he's trolling you and the thing of it is: you and your pals practice hypocrisy and trolling on an epic scale. Usually daily or every other day.