Should there be a special consel to investigate Loretta Lynch?

Originally posted by Robtard
More speculation.

Why would I be in tears over another Trump lie? I didn't support Trump; I didn't vote for Trump. So when he broke his promise of prosecuting Hillary, he didn't break it to me, he broke it to you and the rest of the Trumpers who desperately wanted Clinton's head on a pike.

Honestly, what did it taste like when he did a 180* and went from calling Clinton the 'most corrupt politician ever' to 'the country owes her a debt of gratitude, she is a good person' shortly after the election? "Salty" I assume.

I don't know how it tasted, but probably not as salty as the tears on the night Trump won. Nothing will ever match that salt.

You see that's why I don't care too much he didn't go after Hilary: he doesn't have to. She's already done, she'll forever be known as the woman who lost to Trump and that is hilarious. Trump could get impeached tomorrow and that wouldn't change.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no. surt should address and correct his lies regarding the investigation and mueller, first.

LoL, don't hold you breath. He take one out of glorious leader's book. Deny, Deflect and Dance when caught in a lie.

what a surprise, surt eagerly grabs for the topic-shift to avoid answering for his lies.

so courageous, surt. 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't know how it tasted, but probably not as salty as the tears on the night Trump won. Nothing will ever match that salt.

You see that's why I don't care too much he didn't go after Hilary: he doesn't have to. She's already done, she'll forever be known as the woman who lost to Trump and that is hilarious. Trump could get impeached tomorrow and that wouldn't change.

What a weird coincidence that since Trump took office, every time he breaks a promise, you go something like "meh, that wasn't important to me".

Anyhow, anything to say in regards to your fake news in here?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
what a surprise, surt eagerly grabs for the topic-shift to avoid answering for his lies.

so courageous, surt. 👆

Lol, what lies? There are staffers on there that have donated to Hilary and other democrats.

In fact I just read an article today about yet ANOTHER person who donated being brought on. Small amounts, but the woman being brought on in the past claimed to be apolitical. So she is not.

Originally posted by Robtard
What a weird coincidence that since Trump took office, every time he breaks a promise, you go something like "meh, that wasn't important to me".

Anyhow, anything to say in regards to your fake news in here?

Point to the fake news. Your butt buddy posted an article showing 3, and I just noted I saw another article with yet another staffer who donated to Clinton and Obama.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, what lies? There are staffers on there that have donated to Hilary and other democrats.

In fact I just read an article today about yet ANOTHER person who donated being brought on. Small amounts, but the woman being brought on in the past claimed to be apolitical. So she is not.

as i already posted, and you (very bravely) tucked tail and avoided: only one of the staffers donated to the clinton campaign. and so, you're a liar. i call you a liar because someone who made an honest mistake would correct themselves. yet here you are shamelessly and malignantly repeating a baldfaced lie. why?

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...mocratic-causes

more proof that you really do think that a page-turn somehow reboots the thread and erases your screw-ups.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
as i already posted, and you (very bravely) tucked tail and avoided: only one of the staffers donated to the clinton campaign. and so, you're a liar. i call you a liar because someone who made an honest mistake would correct themselves. yet here you are shamelessly and malignantly repeating a baldfaced lie. why?

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...mocratic-causes

more proof that you really do think that a page-turn somehow reboots the thread and erases your screw-ups.

The ones that didn't donate to Clinton donated to other democrats though, and a new person just put on board also donated to Clinton.

So where is the lie, since the first names I posted for Backfire listed people who did not donate specifically to Clinton. Then you come in and act like you dropped some knowledge on me, but you didn't. I literally posted about it on the first page. Not all were Clinton, some just donated to other democrats, and I'm worried about it being non-partisan.

Originally posted by Surtur
The reasons are the fact he picked several people on his staff who donated thousands of dollars to Hilary's presidential campaign.

you said several donated to clinton. only one did. so you LIED.

now you're avoiding the fact that you LIED and are trying to assert that donating to any political campaigns auto-disqualifies council members. you're pathetic.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you said several donated to clinton. only one did. so you LIED.

now you're avoiding the fact that you LIED and are trying to assert that donating to any political campaigns auto-disqualifies council members. you're pathetic.

Lol uh, I posted a list on the first page and 3 have Hilary connections. I got that straight from an article.

So you are saying the article is false?

Oh and there were 3, now we have 4.

you posted no source. should i just trust a liar then?

so are you going to post a link, or are you just going to do your silly dance again?

Why do I get the feeling you'll dismiss it because of the source? But oh well, it'll be entertaining either way.

Mark Levin: Mueller Investigation Is Pretext To Impeachment

Elizabeth Prelogar needs to be added. Donated less than $1000 to H Doggy Dog, but also claimed she was apolitical. I don't want someone on the staff who doesn't know what words mean.

the hill reported that dreeben donated to clinton, and later issued a correction when the special council spokesman said otherwise. so even before the retraction it was only 2 reported as having donated to clinton. now it is only one.

since the site you linked posted no such corrections, i call your dodgy 'source' a pile of dogshit. and since you just waved your hand at a valid journalistic source, you must believe yourself adorable to make such a petty and silly accusation against me.

did you even RTFA?

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337428-four-top-legal-experts-on-muellers-team-donated-to-democratic-causes

:edit: yup, confirmed dogshit conspiracy-site source as usual. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the hill reported that dreeben donated to clinton, and later issued a correction when the special council spokesman said otherwise. so even before the retraction it was only 2 reported as having donated to clinton. now it is only one.

since the site you linked posted no such corrections, i call your dodgy 'source' a pile of dogshit. and since you just waved your hand at a valid journalistic source, you must believe yourself adorable to make such a petty and silly accusation against me.

did you even RTFA?

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337428-four-top-legal-experts-on-muellers-team-donated-to-democratic-causes

doesnt matter. he'll simply go on peddling the same lies. his moral/ethical compass is broken/nonexistent.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
doesnt matter. he'll simply go on peddling the same lies. his moral/ethical compass is broken/nonexistent.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Sadly I concur but in all seriousness, the heinous attitudes of the Alt-right and the normalization of ideas our fathers and mothers taught us not to think are the real problems, they are pervasive and backed by schoolyard bullying tactics on youtube etc. The anonymity of the internet just helps the trolls think they are cool kids spouting things they would never say in person. I hate to say I think the internet got us here and gave us Trump and Co.

i agree that this phenomenon is real, but radicalization of undereducated rage-addicted right-wingers has been going on since the 1960's via AM radio right-wing misinformation talk shows. source: nixon happened

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i agree that this phenomenon is real, but radicalization of undereducated rage-addicted right-wingers has been going on since the 1960's via AM radio right-wing talk shows. source: nixon happened

Originally posted by Surtur
Point to the fake news. Your butt buddy posted an article showing 3, and I just noted I saw another article with yet another staffer who donated to Clinton and Obama.

My "butt buddy" Bashar literally posted sources showing you lied, or more correctly you pushed a conservative fake news article intended to smear Mueller, who magically went from "impeccable morals" to 'cucklord who works for Obama/Clinton/Deep-gov'mint' in less than a month in the eyes of conservatives.

An adult would admit they fell for a hack job meant to smear; hopefully apologize for their error and move on; let's see what you do, sporto

Originally posted by Robtard
My "butt buddy" Basher literally posted sources showing you lied, or more correctly you pushed a conservative fake news article intended to smear Mueller, who magically went from "impeccable morals" to 'cucklord who works for Obama/Clinton/Deep-gov'mint' in less than a month in the eyes of conservatives.

An adult would admit they fell for a hack job meant to smear; hopefully apologize for their error and move on; let's see what you do, sporto.

👆