Originally posted by Robtard
I especially love the narrative that if it's an illegal vote, then it must have been cast to the Democrat.The one case of confirmed voter fraud (unless more have come out?) in the 2016 election was by a woman in Iowa who voted twice for Trump because she believed the fake stories from Trump and company. Oh Trumpers...
Many people have admitted to voting twice in the 2016 election, on social media. From both sides.
Also, read about this:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/17/no-voter-fraud-isnt-myth-10-cases-where-its-all-to/
1. Dead people voting in Colorado.
2. Illegals found voting in Virginia; only discovered after they self-reported.
3. Some Pennsylvania citizens voting twice.
4. Illegal voters uncovered in Philadelphia; half had previously voted.
5. Voter rigging triggers probe in Texas.
6. Indiana voter fraud investigation grows to 56 counties.
"“Police believe there could be hundreds of fraudulent voter registration records with different combinations of made up names and addresses with people’s real information,” NBC 12 reported."
7. Three under investigation in Oklahoma for voting twice in the presidential primary.
8. Election fraud in Kentucky.
9. Underage voters found voting in Wisconsin’s presidential primary.
10. Voter registration cards sent to illegals in Pennsylvania.
I should point out that the fraud is clearly happening on both sides from that top 10 list I just pasted.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
But it's true! Just check my sources:
Ha!
Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, non-citizens should not be vote. However, thankfully, this current figure seems to be one that was pulled out of their ass using shaky math and assumptions.
The range of the precise numbers proves it's hard to pin-point how many non-citizens voted.
But voter fraud (as ddm posted above) is quite prevalent in the US and non-citiezens do vote, unfrotunatelly.
Originally posted by Henry_Pym
I still find it hilarious that India has voter ID laws but apparently Black Americans can't comply with it and it is racist to assume that they could
What I find hilarious is how people are now constantly citing a site as evidence of reliability that puts CNN, Breitbart, and Heat Street(among others) in the same category when it comes to their factual reporting rating(which is the most important part to me). I go to Heat Street, but others here always bash it.
Then again as of late, CNN probably deserves to be put down a notch.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated WorldNetDaily as an anti-government extremist group that "peddles in white nationalism" and is a source of "conspiracy theories, gay-bashing, anti-Muslim propaganda, and End Times prophecy."In 2008, WorldNetDaily agreed to pay an out-of-court settlement in a libel suit brought by Clark Jones for knowingly publishing false claims about him, including that he had interfered with a criminal investigation, was the subject of a criminal investigation, had ties to criminal activity, and was a drug dealer.
WorldNetDaily gained notoriety for repeatedly publicizing birther conspiracy theories that Barack Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen, that his long-form birth certificate is counterfeit, and that he is not eligible to serve as President of the United States.
Anyone with a functioning brain can see that WorldNetDaily is not a legitimate news source.
Oh I agree. I was using sarcasm to convey how I felt about the OP's position.
Virginia student heading to prison after registering dead voters for Democrats
😆
No doubt this story will be on all the media outlets, lol 😉
meanwhile, in reality, they sourced cbs (fake newz) for the article.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
meanwhile, in reality, they sourced cbs (fake newz) for the article.
The site you guys worship gives them a "high" factual reporting rating.
We're done with that site then, correct?
you're a pathological liar.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/
"mixed", you pathetic worm. now posture some more and change the topic. ask me some irrelevant gotcha questions to distract from your malignancy.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol but yes it is true, right on the site. They both have the same factual reporting rating.
Only if one didn't read the corresponding information which further explained the positions could someone come to that conclusion. A retard would do that; a sensible person would read and understand the differences.
Originally posted by Robtard
Only if one didn't read the corresponding information which further explained the positions could someone come to that conclusion. A retard would do that; a sensible person would read and understand the differences.
I did, but I'm just going by the factual reporting. Since despite the info, they both got ranked the same. Weird.