Originally posted by Surtur
I wondering who the cops were that turned them in, they must not have drank as much kool aid as the others.
So now it's a bad thing for authorities to report improper conduct of other authorities because there was an illegal involved? LoLz, your hatred of illegals has you speaking like a proper fascist. Eh, maybe the margarine of fascism.
Originally posted by Robtard
Authorities should have followed proper protocols, just because someone is illegal; it doesn't mean they have less rights than animals. Hopefully these same people will next time do a better job and deport people properly.Meh, California's economy is stronger than most other counties. 190k loss to the state isn't even noticeable.
Indeed.
And there's a LOT of undocumented labor there, so the state itself has an interest in keeping confidence in their police forces high..
Not an argument for or against the topic, just stating a fact (Of particular interest to me, is how one minority hollywood blogger gave some insight into just how big certain undocumented populations really are. Went on to claim blacks (He himself is black) may be discriminated against to an extent, but that's nowhere near comparable to how latino's are overlooked almost entirely by hollywood, given their disproportionate numbers in the area..)
Originally posted by Robtard
So now it's a bad thing for authorities to report improper conduct of other authorities because there was an illegal involved? LoLz, your hatred of illegals has you speaking like a proper fascist. Eh, maybe the margarine of fascism.
Yes, because we've been told it's a bad thing for ICE to get called on non-violent illegals. Even in places without specific sanctuary laws.
So I ask the same to you, in all the states that lack this law: it's not a bad thing for them to enforce immigration laws, right? Though even if you don't believe it's bad, most of your fellow libbies do believe it is bad.
It can't be both, it's an all or nothing thing. If we're going to shrug and go "Well rules are rules" then okay, we apply that all across the board.
Originally posted by cdtm
Pretty much, anybody can sue anyone about anything.
Interesting. Kate Steinle's family...they can sue the city then, right?
I'm just messing with you, I asked you a question I already know the answer to: no, the answer is no, they were told they could not do so, by a judge.
Makes this country look ass backwards, but I'm glad people are now sticklers for immigration laws. I am looking forward to this being practiced in the future.
Originally posted by Surtur
Yes, because we've been told it's a bad thing for ICE to get called on non-violent illegals. Even in places without specific sanctuary laws.So I ask the same to you, in all the states that lack this law: it's not a bad thing for them to enforce immigration laws, right? Though even if you don't believe it's bad, most of your fellow libbies do believe it is bad.
It can't be both, it's an all or nothing thing. If we're going to shrug and go "Well rules are rules" then okay, we apply that all across the board.
You're just ranting now and trying to confuse the situation.
The facts are, the authorities here didn't do things by the book so they're getting dinged for it as even illegals have human rights. (yes, that bothers you).
Originally posted by Robtard
You're just ranting now and trying to confuse the situation.The facts are, the authorities here didn't do things by the book so they're getting dinged for it as even illegals have human rights. (yes, that bothers you).
What I'm saying is if they are going to be sticklers for immigration laws then I am all on board. I can't wait to see them encouraging others to respect our immigration laws.
Now we will have some peace and quiet and the people of California will not be whining about immigration laws being enforced. They should be very enthused by this, they finally take immigration laws seriously.
Honestly, do you even know what you're complaining about anymore?
Because you initially made this thread to whine about how some illegal was allowed to sue because his rights were violated and the idea of an illegal having rights is anathema to you. Do you need another redo? I'll let you have it, if you ask nicely.
Originally posted by Surtur
Interesting. Kate Steinle's family...they can sue the city then, right?I'm just messing with you, I asked you a question I already know the answer to: no, the answer is no, they were told they could not do so, by a judge.
Makes this country look ass backwards, but I'm glad people are now sticklers for immigration laws. I am looking forward to this being practiced in the future.
Was talking in a general sense. A judge is basically the gatekeeper to a lawsuit being successfully claimed, and cities/governments are still harder to go after then a private citizen.
And in that casen the city isn't responsible for the actions of former cons.
At least, by the judge's logic. He allows that lawsuit, and suddenly everyone who's ever been harmed by a felon will sue cities.
Remember too, that police officers are under no obligation to protect citizens, even if they're right there while someone's getting mugged. The standard governmemt defense against lawsuits is that basically no obligation to the public beyond "Don't shoot them/ruin their lives by a massive ****up".
Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly, do you even know what you're complaining about anymore?Because you initially made this thread to whine about how some illegal was allowed to sue because his rights were violated and the idea of an illegal having rights is anathema to you. Do you need another redo? I'll let you have it, if you ask nicely.
Lol@ you thinking you allow anything to happen. Keep up that sense of humor Rob, it will serve you well.