Homophobic? Is Homophobia In The Bible?

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Some Christians hold the same understanding of Genesis 9:24 as you do (i.e. that Ham sodomized his father while he was passed out from alcohol), while others interpret verse 24 to mean that Ham simply gazed upon, or looked at his father’s naked body while he was passed out from alcohol.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Also, I fixed some errors on this post.

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/...67pB92RCMg/edit]

You think seeing one's father naked is such a blasphemy that one's child and then bloodline is cursed? LoLz. You probably do. But really, Ham buttraped his drunkard of a father, probably as revenge for forcing him to go on what likely was a god-awful boat ride.

Error's? That was a direct copy/paste from King James' own bible, you heathen.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Actually, biblical verses only explicitly frown upon male homosexuality. God is apparently big on girl-on-girl.

Psshh, friggin sexist. What a rare instance of God not being fair.

Originally posted by Surtur
Psshh, friggin sexist. What a rare instance of God not being fair.

OT God is not fair or reasonable or even remotely likable. But he could whimsically destroy your race because of a bad day, so you worshipped him out of fear.

If OT God was in a fantasy series, he would be the ultimate evil people would band together to overcome.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
OT God is not fair or reasonable or even remotely likable. But he could whimsically destroy your race because of a bad day, so you worshipped him out of fear.

If OT God was in a fantasy series, he would be the ultimate evil people would band together to overcome.

I responded to your last post to me in the Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread.

You can go there to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I responded to your last post to me in the [b]Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread.

You can go there to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit [/B]

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Dude, that's 32 pages long. Do you really think anyone will read that?

😂

C'mon... who doesn't want to read 32 pages of JesusLovesYou writing?

If you loved God you would do it! 😠

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Dude, that's 32 pages long. Do you really think anyone will read that?

My response to Stealth Moose's last post to me in the Can ANYONE Go To Heaven? thread is not really 32 pages.

I use a lot of space.

Stealth Moose, you can go there to the above thread to find it, or click on the link below:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbWxQoF-OXX3OGfZkuJ8HKjPNzBMjtU62Ak8uputjuU/edit [/B][/QUOTE]

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Actually, biblical verses only explicitly frown upon male homosexuality. God is apparently big on girl-on-girl.

Chapter and verse supporting your assertion.

I can cite chapter and verse refuting your claim.

Romans 1:26-27

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

The Bible says that even women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

Women had "exchanged" the "natural use" for what is "against nature". They were exchanging their bodies sexually with same gender and animals.

Women were doing things sexually with their bodies (most likely homosexuality and bestiality) that is "against nature". The Bible calls their perverted sexual desires vile passions.

So, no, God does "not" approve of, nor condone female homosexual relationships/encounters either.

Still havent fixd that sig? Good LORD (no pun intended)!

What is wrong with the sig that you can't seem to let go of?

(I mean, besides the fact that it's Christian propaganda)

Well, at first it was a broken image. Now its a broken link.

I've no problem with the working pic itself, or its message.
I dont mind religion. I mind ppl who use it to troll internet message boards.

In the bible it says something along the lines of "A man shall not lay with another man, it is an abomination".

Originally posted by Jmanghan
In the bible it says something along the lines of "A man shall not lay with another man, it is an abomination".

It also says if you wear ripped jeans, you're going to burn:

Leviticus 10:6 “Uncover not your heads, neither rend your clothes; lest ye die, and lest wrath come upon all the people.”

The bible was written by men.
At best its a guideline.
Taking everything it (or any religous text) says literally is foolish.
Pushing those literal views on others in RL is presumptuous.
Starting multiple threads pushing those views is trolling.

Originally posted by riv6672
Well, at first it was a broken image. Now its a broken link.

I've no problem with the working pic itself, or its message.
I dont mind religion. I mind ppl who use it to troll internet message boards.

😕

What makes you think this person is a troll?

What exactly have you seen, or what do you think you're seeing, that would mark him or her as such, given how willingly and seriously he or she discusses topics with other posters so far?

Originally posted by riv6672
Starting multiple threads pushing those views is trolling.

I tend to agree.

[QUOTE=]Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Chapter and verse supporting your assertion.

I can cite chapter and verse [b]refuting your claim.

Romans 1:26-27

For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

The Bible says that even women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.

Women had "exchanged" the "natural use" for what is "against nature". They were exchanging their bodies sexually with same gender and animals.

Women were doing things sexually with their bodies (most likely homosexuality and bestiality) that is "against nature". The Bible calls their perverted sexual desires vile passions.

So, no, God does "not" approve of, nor condone female homosexual relationships/encounters either. [/B][/QUOTE]

1. Leviticus is the old Testament source of most homosexuality hating justification, and it quite clearly only refers to men. Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

2. New Testament references to male homosexuality include 1 Corinthians 6:9 (which lumps in things like fornicators into the same group of undesirables), 1 Timothy 1:10, and Romans 1:26-27.

3. Only the last one refers to women. And pretty much all of the references to anti-homosexuality in the NT come from the works of Paul, not from the words of Jesus, and not from the words of God.

So you can conclude that Paul hates sex.

Point, you.

EDIT

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
...And pretty much all of the references to anti-homosexuality in the NT come from the works of Paul, not from the words of Jesus, and not from the words of God.

So you can conclude that Paul hates sex.

Excuse me... Mr. Moose. You know God was speaking thru Paul, right?

Therefore God hates fags and sex. 😎

*Drops mic*

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
The man who coined the word [b]homophobia did so incorrectly.

He should have just used contra-, or anti-homosexual, to denote people who do "not" agree with the homosexual lifestyle, and/or who denounce it—not homophobia. [/B]

Correction:

The man who coined the word homophobia did so incorrectly.

He should have just used contrahomosexuality or antihomsexuality, to denote people who do "not" agree with the homosexual lifestyle, and/or who denounce it—not homophobia.

I inadvertently wrote that the guy should have used antihomosexual which is "not" correct because God is "not" against homosexuals, He's against homosexuality. There's a difference.