Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Flyattractor922 pages
Originally posted by Scribble
Ungrateful are so lazy! Smart are so difficult!

...Yeah. You are pretty easy .


🤣

Lol...oh leftists:

How Murderer Charles Manson and Donald Trump Used Language to Gain Followers

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's the best. 👆

What you think about this:

Why Is The DOJ Downplaying Reports Of Proof Linking Obama And Clinton To Russian Corruption

So the other day I was watching some of Sargons "This Year in Stupid" videos. There is one story from 2014 I had never heard of until now, but it is f*cking hilarious.

Mugged student refuses to condemn attackers because of his 'privilege'

“Not once did I consider our attackers to be ‘bad people.’ I trust that they weren’t trying to hurt me. In fact, if they knew me, I bet they’d think I was okay,” wrote Friedfeld in an editorial featured in The Hoya, the university’s newspaper. “The fact that these two kids, who appeared younger than I, have even had to entertain these questions suggests their universes are light years away from mine.”

LMFAO!

"Who am I to stand from my perch of privilege, surrounded by million-dollar homes and paying for a $60,000 education, to condemn these young men as ‘thugs?’” asks Friedfeld. “It’s precisely this kind of ‘otherization’ that fuels the problem.”

Solid gold. Platinum, even.

"The millennial generation is taking over the reins of the world, and thus we are presented with a wonderful opportunity to right some of the wrongs of the past,” writes Friedfeld. “Until we do so, we should get comfortable with sporadic muggings and break-ins. I can hardly blame them. The cards are all in our hands, and we’re not playing them.”

😆

Here is a good one. When Cops Flush. Students TRIGGER in their PANTS!!!!!!

Brooklyn College wants to BAN Cops from thier Crappers!! For GOOD REASONS

YouTube video

This is spot on. I don't think the Dems realize how bad they look going after Clinton now, because he is no longer in power nor is his wife.

Does anyone here legitimately believe they'd still be doing this if Clinton had won in 2016? If so, I have a bridge to sell you, it's made of solid gold and diamonds.

They went full retard:

YouTube video

Interrogating her for playing a Jordan Peterson clip. Insanity.

Originally posted by Surtur
Scrib I can give you a brief brief summary. Apparently, hate crimes are rising, but...the thing of it is that in the last several years more and more police departments are providing their stats for hate crimes, etc. So obviously the number is gonna rise as more places provide stats.

So it's increasing because of more participation, but there is also the fact that hate crimes against whites have represented a significant rise as well. So when the media says "hate crimes are on the rise" they don't get specific because they know most people will assume they are crimes just against blacks or muslims, etc.

IOW: We've been fed an utter steaming pile of horseshit, and they do it because they know people won't do proper data analysis.

Sounds like classic data misinterpretation. I have a deep distrust of data-based political claims generally and this is a great example of why.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]...Yeah. You are pretty easy .


🤣 [/B]

Yeah, I'm easy. Easy like Sunday morning. Hah!

Originally posted by Surtur
They went full retard:

YouTube video

Interrogating her for playing a Jordan Peterson clip. Insanity.


The state of free speech in Canada is disgusting. Before I viewed it with a mix of amusement and contempt, but when listening to that tape the other day it made me feel physically ill.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the Canadians who have to live under this Orwellian bullshit.

Loving the Incel Storrmfront style decoration you have created in this thread guys, it reeks of desperation. 👆 😆

Originally posted by Surtur
They went full retard:

YouTube video

Interrogating her for playing a Jordan Peterson clip. Insanity.

I agree with her sentiments: you're doing your students a disservice by not exposing them to the arguments on certain topics and issues. You will not equip them for the real world. You will not teach them how to debate bigoted and even seemingly intellectual ideas.

The administrator talking in the vid (sounded like a teenage boy) was wrong when he said it was like teaching the students arguments for why racism is okay. That's not true at all. It's like teaching the students what arguments racists use to justify their racism. That's definitely something I would want my children to learn.

Also, she did the one thing I teach all of my female employees never to do: cry in the professional world when upset. That gives your aggressors so much power and "win" over you and the situation. Some think it can be used as an emotional manipulator to get out of a tough situation or to convince their aggressor to side with them. But in the long term, that is not at all what happens. It, instead, makes the person feel like they've won and that she is weak. Why do I know this? Because I hear those exact words post-situation from the aggressors. They thrive on those tears. I tell my female employees to practice their arguments with others or by themselves and to emotionally and mentally prepare for the confrontation and argument so they do not cry. And then after the situation, go somewhere private and cry their eyes out until they feel better. Never give those assholes the satisfaction of seeing your tears. 😠

Originally posted by Scribble
Sounds like classic data misinterpretation. I have a deep distrust of data-based political claims generally and this is a great example of why.

It's going to certainly make me think twice in the future when it comes to hearing about stats, etc.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I agree with her sentiments: you're doing your students a disservice by not exposing them to the arguments on certain topics and issues. You will not equip them for the real world. You will not teach them how to debate bigoted and even seemingly intellectual ideas.

The administrator talking in the vid (sounded like a teenage boy) was wrong when he said it was like teaching the students arguments for why racism is okay. That's not true at all. It's like teaching the students what arguments racists use to justify their racism. That's definitely something I would want my children to learn.


That would be true if it what he was saying was actually bigoted, but what Jordan Peterson was saying wasn't "abusive" or "violence" or "transphobic" he was arguing that legislation shouldn't compel people to speak in ways they do not wish to speak, plus Peterson utterly demolished his opponent who was completely retarded and literally said "there is no such thing as biological sex.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's going to certainly make me think twice in the future when it comes to hearing about stats, etc.

Oh, yes, kind of makes me buttmad. I don't like to be bamboozled by a place I am supposed to trust. Even if their perspective is slanted, I should be able to easily pick up on that because it will show in their writing. But something so outrightly misleading hurts my feefees. 🙁

This is why I applauded Scribtastophales for looking at the youtubers sources instead of just believing the youtuber.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's going to certainly make me think twice in the future when it comes to hearing about stats, etc.
Damn Data, you can prove anything with facts. Let's ignore them. What's the worst that could happen?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I agree with her sentiments: you're doing your students a disservice by not exposing them to the arguments on certain topics and issues. You will not equip them for the real world. You will not teach them how to debate bigoted and even seemingly intellectual ideas.

The administrator talking in the vid (sounded like a teenage boy) was wrong when he said it was like teaching the students arguments for why racism is okay. That's not true at all. It's like teaching the students what arguments racists use to justify their racism. That's definitely something I would want my children to learn.

Also, she did the one thing I teach all of my female employees never to do: cry in the professional world when upset. That gives your aggressors so much power and "win" over you and the situation. Some think it can be used as an emotional manipulator to get out of a tough situation or to convince their aggressor to side with them. But in the long term, that is not at all what happens. It, instead, makes the person feel like they've won and that she is weak. Why do I know this? Because I hear those exact words post-situation from the aggressors. They thrive on those tears. I tell my female employees to practice their arguments with others or by themselves and to emotionally and mentally prepare for the confrontation and argument so they do not cry. And then after the situation, go somewhere private and cry their eyes out until they feel better. Never give those assholes the satisfaction of seeing your tears. 😠

Yep, in the past it seems like a teachers job was to actually...teach their students knowledge, etc. Now it seems they have to basically not only do that, but shield them from the entire world as well. Admittedly I guess if you teach younger kids you have to be part babysitter and part teacher in a way, but now we are seeing this with adults as well. The alarming thing is this woman who did this is not normal. She is more than likely a rarity among teachers these days.

Btw, what kinda business you run? You should just show the women a clip of Tom Hanks from "A League of Their Own" where he says there is no crying in baseball. Boom, done.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yep, in the past it seems like a teachers job was to actually...teach their students knowledge, etc. Now it seems they have to basically not only do that, but shield them from the entire world as well. Admittedly I guess if you teach younger kids you have to be part babysitter and part teacher in a way, but now we are seeing this with adults as well. The alarming thing is this woman who did this is not normal. She is more than likely a rarity among teachers these days.

Btw, what kinda business you run? You should just show the women a clip of Tom Hanks from "A League of Their Own" where he says there is no crying in baseball. Boom, done.

Damn those teachers for having ideals and wanting a better world, we should replace the kids in our schools with Aryan Hitler youth.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Damn Data, you can prove anything with facts. Let's ignore them. What's the worst that could happen?

Data can obviously be manipulated if taken out of context, etc. I don't see it as wrong to at least be wary.

Originally posted by Surtur
Data can obviously be manipulated if taken out of context, etc. I don't see it as wrong to at least be wary.
That I can agree with.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Damn those teachers for having ideals and wanting a better world, we should replace the kids in our schools with Aryan Hitler youth.

Lol, I'm sure they have convinced themselves they have good intentions, But the reality is we aren't heading for a better world, we're heading for a future that seems to be disturbingly getting more and more like 1984 in some aspects.