Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Scribble922 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
Also, why is that? Daily Mail is not conservative at all: extremely liberal and proud of it. So why are the comments a cesspool?
You what? The Daily Mail is a pure, unfiltered reactionary right-wing rag, and that's on a good day. In the UK, aside from the Sun, they're the primary propagator of exaggerated fact and twisted statistics.

(That wasn't meant to end up as tongue-twistery as it did awehuhs)

^^^Dude is racist against mail that comes daily. I bet you throw rocks at the mailman when he comes around.

Get off my lawn!

Originally posted by Surtur
You spoke about leftists exposing people lol. They also didn't say a damn thing about this until other people did. That is not anything worthy of a pat on the back.
Once NBC received a complaint, they promptly terminated Lauer's contract and publicized their reasons for doing so. I would say that qualifies as exposing Matt Lauer. And there's no evidence NBC had knowledge of Lauer's behavior before receiving the complaint, but if there was I would agree with you.

Originally posted by Firefly218
The point is that leftists en masse are supporting the victims whilst right-wingers seem to be supporting the abuser. I'm sure we can agree on this point.
But we can agree on this point right??? ^^^

Originally posted by Scribble
You what? The Daily Mail is a pure, unfiltered reactionary right-wing rag, and that's on a good day. In the UK, aside from the Sun, they're the primary propagator of exaggerated fact and twisted statistics.

(That wasn't meant to end up as tongue-twistery as it did awehuhs)

My bad, you're right. I just looked it up:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

I have always associated every single trashy tabloid-ish "news" site as liberal. Extremely liberal.

Originally posted by dadudemon
My bad, you're right. I just looked it up:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

I have always associated every single trashy tabloid-ish "news" site as liberal. Extremely liberal.

Other way around in the UK, most tabloid rags are conservative. Not all, obviously, but most. I swear even the supposedly liberal ones peddle the same shit as the conservative ones, judging from the headlines.

Not surprising that the "Tabloid Rags" would be considred to be "Conservative" seeing as how the Majority of the "Legitimate Press" in the UK is Hard Core Socialist.

Originally posted by dadudemon

I have always associated every single trashy tabloid-ish "news" site as liberal. Extremely liberal.

The National Enquirer (our version of The Daily Mail) is very far-Right as well

Originally posted by Robtard
The National Enquirer (our version of The Daily Mail) is very far-Right as well

It is now Official.Robbie is Bat Boy....

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Not surprising that the "Tabloid Rags" would be considred to be "Conservative" seeing as how the Majority of the "Legitimate Press" in the UK is Hard Core Socialist. [/B]
Wrong. Most of the press favour the Conservatives, even the BBC. Your knowledge, across the board, is incredibly limited.

As is you gullibility at willing to be fooled and accept that kind of LIE!!! But then you are just a product of a failing socialist country.

Um, I live in Britain, so I don't have to believe whatever "lie" you're talking about. I watch the news and read the papers. The media is biased towards the Conservatives. I see this first hand. I have no idea where your information comes from, probably a YouTube video with 6000 views or something. Also, lol at the idea of the UK being a socialist country. That nuggen of info must have come from a YouTube video as well, except that one only has 2000 views.

Lol...

Watch how Democratic lawmakers respond when asked about consequences for sexual harassment

"Other men in other industries have faced similar accusations and gotten out of the way, resigned, stepped down far faster than he has, right?” a reporter asked.

“I don’t know, you would have to give me some examples,” Richmond replied.

The reporters cited Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose, and Matt Lauer as examples of men who have lost their jobs over such allegations.

Clyburn, as he entered an elevator, asked, “Who elected them?”

“So it’s different if he’s elected?” a reporter asked. Clyburn did not reply as the elevator door closed."

😆

And you wondee why everybody is a conspiracy theorist:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/12/lobbying-10-ways-corprations-influence-government

Talks of smoke and mirror lobbying tactics. Everything from using a firm to "engineer" a following to funding third party expert opinions.

And this is why it's impossible to know who to trust, or who's acting genuinely..

Originally posted by Scribble
Um, I live in Britain, so I don't have to believe whatever "lie" you're talking about. I watch the news and read the papers.

You "READ THE PAPERS"?

Gawd How OLD Are YOU!?

LMAO:

UC Berkeley ‘Where We Cry’ map shows where students have shed tears — and why

"Here’s what triggered a few of those welled-up eyes:

Trump won
walking to class the day after the election
I saw Milo
Tear gas
One person confessed to breaking down after going with a friend to an “undocumented student healing circle after September 5th” — the day the Trump administration ordered an end to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that shields young illegal immigrants from deportation. “We both cried in each other’s arms.”

A cry map. Lol. Shut this school down, seriously.

Originally posted by Surtur
LMAO:

UC Berkeley ‘Where We Cry’ map shows where students have shed tears — and why

[b]"Here’s what triggered a few of those welled-up eyes:

Trump won
walking to class the day after the election
I saw Milo
Tear gas
One person confessed to breaking down after going with a friend to an “undocumented student healing circle after September 5th” — the day the Trump administration ordered an end to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that shields young illegal immigrants from deportation. “We both cried in each other’s arms.”

A cry map. Lol. Shut this school down, seriously. [/B]

While rather pathetic, I am not about shutting down expressions of First Amendment protected free speech, nor am I on board with silencing people whose speech I don't like.

Let them cry. Let them track it. Let them have problems. Please? This is motherf*cking America. We've got rights and shit. estahuh

Originally posted by Surtur
LMAO:

UC Berkeley ‘Where We Cry’ map shows where students have shed tears — and why

[b]"Here’s what triggered a few of those welled-up eyes:

Trump won
walking to class the day after the election
I saw Milo
Tear gas
One person confessed to breaking down after going with a friend to an “undocumented student healing circle after September 5th” — the day the Trump administration ordered an end to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that shields young illegal immigrants from deportation. “We both cried in each other’s arms.”

A cry map. Lol. Shut this school down, seriously. [/B]

Next time you ask "how am I a Fascist!?". Remember this post of yours. Closing schools [over trivial dislikes no less] is pretty Fascist-y

Originally posted by Robtard
Next time you ask "how am I a Fascist!?". Remember this post of yours. Closing schools [over trivial dislikes no less] is pretty Fascist-y

Nah, that has nothing to do with Fascism, really. And more about "I don't like this particular kind of speech because I think it is stupid."

That's the same type of speech shaming that Antifa and lefties are trying to do to people who want to speak messages that they don't agree with.

Where were you with comments like that when people got conservative speakers shut down from talking at Universities? Really, though, dude, Surts position and what actually happened are two different things. It's far worse. Surt's desire to censor free speech because it is stupid whiny babies being babies, is never going to happen. But speakers really were driven away from speaking. That really happened. One is empty hot air and is mostly jest. The other is legit censorship.

So where were your claims of fascism against your lefties, Robtard? Hmmmmmmmmmm?

Originally posted by Scribble
Other way around in the UK, most tabloid rags are conservative. Not all, obviously, but most. I swear even the supposedly liberal ones peddle the same shit as the conservative ones, judging from the headlines.
Originally posted by Robtard
The National Enquirer (our version of The Daily Mail) is very far-Right as well

See, I did not know this.

I always associate smut, gossip, and gross explicit sex talk with liberals because they are more open and free with their sexuality.

I had no idea conservatives were doing this, too. Doesn't that make them hypocrites? Not that I can correctly call them Christians but it's very obviously preached against by Christ himself not to trash talk and judge others like this. Very un-Christlike to run tabloid smut "news" sites, imo.