Originally posted by Surtur
It will always be hilarious they gave him a nobel peace prize.
"I'll take things that still make me butthurt for $500, Alex."
"Oh, you've selected today's daily double. How much will you wager?
"All of it."
"This US President is the most beloved modern US president but he shit all over his voters, lied quite often, and broke many of his key promises that got him elected."
Originally posted by dadudemon
"I'll take things that still make me butthurt for $500, Alex.""Oh, you've selected today's daily double. How much will you wager?
"All of it."
"This US President is the most beloved modern US president but he shit all over his voters, lied quite often, and broke many of his key promises that got him elected."
Lol reminds me of the recent Jeopardy episode where Alex Trebek laughs at the contestants for not knowing anything about football.
U.S. Veterans Affairs headquarters refuses request to make its motto ‘gender neutral’
"The Department of Veterans Affairs has denied a request to make its motto “gender neutral,” reports Stars and Stripes, a military newspaper.
For 59 years, the VA’s motto has read: “To care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan.” The quote comes from Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural address in 1865, the same year Lincoln created the government’s institution for volunteer soldiers."
Good, the fact this was even requested is silly. Yet we have this:
"In a response to the IAVA, Kayla Williams, director of the VA Center for Women Veterans, noted that VA leaders have gradually been using an updated version of the quote: “To care for those who shall have borne the battle and their families and survivors.”
So why do it? Seems it is not even an issue.
Lol wow:
Uniformed officer asked to leave ‘gun-free zone’ restaurant for carrying his service weapon
"Ward wrote that a customer seated nearby was “scared for her life” because “police are shooting people” and demanded “to be escorted to her vehicle out of fear of being shot.”
^^F*ck this kunt.
Originally posted by Robtard
White people rioting, flipping over cars, setting fires, breaking windows etc. Why? Because their footieball team won. LoL, White people.
It's almost as crazy as burning down your own city and wrecking the businesses of blacks in order to protest police brutality against blacks. Or robbing a weave store because a memorial to mike brown was damaged. Lol, black people.
Originally posted by Surtur
It's almost as crazy as burning down your own city and wrecking the businesses of blacks in order to protest police brutality against blacks. Or robbing a weave store because a memorial to mike brown was damaged. Lol, black people.
^ Compares rioting over police abusing their power with rioting over a sports team winning as being one in the same. LoL, named KMC's most prolific "massive phaggot" in 2017, indeed
Originally posted by Robtard
^ Compares rioting over police abusing their power with rioting over a sports team winning as being one in the same. LoL, named KMC's most prolific "massive phaggot" in 2017, indeed
Lol they've rioted over lies in the past. Rioted for rightful killings.
And destroying the businesses of the blacks you claim to be protesting about makes them look infinitely more retarded. It shows they are rioting just to riot, destroying just to destroy.
I know you felt you had some sort of gotcha here and it failed. Oh well.
Originally posted by Robtard
Best part of the story, is that they use actual child abuse to segue right into an attack on Clinton. Year+ after she lost and Clinton Derangement Syndrome (CDS) is still in full effect on TheBlaze. No wonder Surt still has Clinton nightmares and is often trig'd.
Oh my, this is dripping with projection.
Originally posted by Robtard
Best part of the story, is that they use actual child abuse to segue right into an attack on Clinton. Year+ after she lost and Clinton Derangement Syndrome (CDS) is still in full effect on TheBlaze. No wonder Surt still has Clinton nightmares and is often trig'd.
Do you Watch/Read The Blaze enough to know that on your own or do you just suck up what Others tell you about it?
EAGERLY AWAITS THE REPLY!!!!!!
😱
Originally posted by Robtard
White people rioting, flipping over cars, setting fires, breaking windows etc. Why? Because their footieball team won. LoL, White people.
Especially since you're treating this as some sort of equivalence to Surtur's criticism of black lives matter, Antifa, or Islamic terror as if it's some sorta gotcha moment when it isn't.
Surtur never made the claim that any of that shit was endemic to racial characteristics, he made the claim that they were the exponent of radical ideologies that view violence as an appropriate strategy in the interest of political goals.
The appropriate equivalent statement to that would be to focus criticism on this stupid hysterical bullshit around sporting events. That would be an equivalent statement.
Why you keep honing in on "Lol, white people" or "Lol, white men in America" and acting as if that's some equivalent to Surtur's statements is beyond me, because such statements that Surtur made aren't racist and are actually grounded in fact.
It's not racist to say that the radical ideologies and ideological justification for violence that the groups Surtur criticizes is what leads to violence and rioting as a consequence, and it's a correct claim to make. On the other hand it is racist to suggest that it's characteristics endemic to being white that lead to the football rioting as a consequence, and it's a baseless and false claim to suggest as much. (Keep in mind I'm not even implying that you are actually racist since I'm aware your statement was meant to be disingenuous).
If that's the gotcha moment you're gonna keep going for with Surtur it's a really shitty one.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I saw black people in that crowd too. I don't get the point of racializing this kinda thing.Especially since you're treating this as some sort of equivalence to Surtur's criticism of black lives matter, Antifa, or Islamic terror as if it's some sorta gotcha moment when it isn't.
Surtur never made the claim that any of that shit was endemic to racial characteristics, he made the claim that they were the exponent of radical ideologies that view violence as an appropriate strategy in the interest of political goals.
The appropriate equivalent statement to that would be to focus criticism on this stupid hysterical bullshit around sporting events. That would be an equivalent statement.
Why you keep honing in on "Lol, white people" or "Lol, white men in America" and acting as if that's some equivalent to Surtur's statements is beyond me, because such statements that Surtur made aren't racist and are actually grounded in fact.
It's not racist to say that the radical ideologies and ideological justification for violence that the groups Surtur criticizes is what leads to violence and rioting as a consequence, and it's a correct claim to make. On the other hand it is racist to suggest that it's characteristics endemic to being white that lead to the football rioting as a consequence, and it's a baseless and false claim to suggest as much. (Keep in mind I'm not even implying that you are actually racist since I'm aware your statement was meant to be disingenuous).
If that's the gotcha moment you're gonna keep going for with Surtur it's a really shitty one.
Bingo. Rob got owned here.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol a woman was asking Justin Trudeau a question and she used the word "mankind" and he interrupted her to tell her she should use the word "people kind". And he was dead serious lol.Liberalism is a mental disorder. Good lord I'll take someone like Trump any day of the week over that.
JT: Use "people kind."
*Smugly shakes his head in virtue signaled self-felating satisfaction*
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol a woman was asking Justin Trudeau a question and she used the word "mankind" and he interrupted her to tell her she should use the word "people kind". And he was dead serious lol.Liberalism is a mental disorder. Good lord I'll take someone like Trump any day of the week over that.
What you're really speaking about is progressivism.