Originally posted by Robtard
Correct.Context: White people on their overpriced Macbooks sit in Starbucks not buying anything; using up an electrical outlet and the free wifi are not asked to leave.
This is irrelevant, though.
A business should be allowed to exercise its own discretion on when to allow certain courtesies and when not to allow it. They should always reserve the right to ask ppl who are basically loitering in their premises to leave if they want to. They can allow ppl to stay and use their facilities if they want but there are a lot of factors that can determine whether they should give the courtesy of allowing non-customers to stay and when these ppl shouldn't (if they are busy that day or if someone who didn't buy anything is taking up space that customers can use, the person who is not a customer that staying in their premises becomes disruptive/a pest, etc.). It is in their right to do so.
I mean sure, racism CAN be a factor here (if it is, they should be condemned for it 100%), but was that proven? Did the manager came by and said "we don't serve your kind here!" or something?
Originally posted by Nibedicus
This is irrelevant, though.A business should be allowed to exercise its own discretion on when to allow certain courtesies and when not to allow it. They should always reserve the right to ask ppl who are basically loitering in their premises to leave if they want to. They can allow ppl to stay and use their facilities if they want but there are a lot of factors that can determine whether they should give the courtesy of allowing non-customers to stay and when these ppl shouldn't (if they are busy that day or if someone who didn't buy anything is taking up space that customers can use, the person who is not a customer that staying in their premises becomes disruptive/a pest, etc.). It is in their right to do so.
I mean sure, racism CAN be a factor here (if it is, they should be condemned for it 100%), but was that proven? Did the manager came by and said "we don't serve your kind here!" or something?
The argument is that the personal anecdotes of white people there apparently show they were able to come in and not order anything and not get kicked it.
But, if you are going to include those as evidence...we must include all the personal anecdotes. Which includes one from a long time customer saying the manager was a SJW and corrected peoples pronouns, etc.
And I just find it hard to believe a SJW is going to kick black people out just for being black. They'd rather sever their own arm off.
Lol these people have legit lost their minds. Love it.
Underground Railroad ‘surprise simulation’ during 6th-grade class trip leaves student ‘frightened’
😆
Originally posted by Surtur
The argument is that the personal anecdotes of white people there apparently show they were able to come in and not order anything and not get kicked it.But, if you are going to include those as evidence...we must include all the personal anecdotes. Which includes one from a long time customer saying the manager was a SJW and corrected peoples pronouns, etc.
Anecdotes are irrelevant to this situation. Prior practices of courtesies do not equal policy. Again, a business should be allowed to exercise its discretion when and when not to allow courtesies to its customers.
Caveat however, is that ppl kicked out by a business are allowed 100% to complain in social media (that is also their right). It comes down to whether ppl believe the accusation or not. It is also the right of the business to sue these ppl for libel, however.
The problem is when ppl start to sue business for alleged racism without proof or where proof is circumstantial or subjective.
Originally posted by Surtur"SJW" doesn't have any meaning left when you say, you label anyone and everyone who doesn't hold your own myopic views a "SJW".
The argument is that the personal anecdotes of white people there apparently show they were able to come in and not order anything and not get kicked it.But, if you are going to include those as evidence...we must include all the personal anecdotes. Which includes one from a long time customer saying the manager was a SJW and corrected peoples pronouns, etc.
And I just find it hard to believe a SJW is going to kick black people out just for being black. They'd rather sever their own arm off.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Anecdotes are irrelevant to this situation. Prior practices of courtesies do not equal policy. Again, a business should be allowed to exercise its discretion when and when not to allow courtesies to its customers.Caveat however, is that ppl kicked out by a business are allowed 100% to complain in social media (that is also their right). It comes down to whether ppl believe the accusation or not. It is also the right of the business to sue these ppl for libel, however.
The problem is when ppl start to sue business for alleged racism without proof or where proof is circumstantial or subjective.
At this point they have gone crazy. A black guy was able to go into a Starbucks and demand a free coffee because of "racism" and..he got that coffee lol.
I'm shocked they didn't offer to shine his shoes for him before sending him on his way.
And now they are going to close *every store in the country* for an entire afternoon over this incident lol. This is hilarious.