Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

A couple of stories:

New California bill would allow illegal immigrants to serve in government — and may be paid

Lol.

Woman livestreams vandalism of UNC’s Silent Sam Confederate monument with her own blood

Lol these lunatics are hilarious. Best comment:

"So, when is she going to vandalize Planned Parenthood buildings and anything that has to do with the eugenicist and racist Margaret Sanger who is responsible for the genocide of millions of black babies?"

Students plan another national walkout — to support the Second Amendment

I'm iffy on this. I thought it was dumb for the anti gun protest to be done during school hours. I'd say protest on your own time. On the other hand, I can't think of a legitimate reason for any school that allowed the walkout to not allow this walkout. So reactions will be interesting.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Black people love when conservatives condescend to them using racially-charged expressions.

It is totally not offensive at all to suggest that black people cannot think for themselves, and are "on the plantation," whether it be social programs, the Democratic Party, or whatever other reason they attribute conservative values and the Republican Party being unpalatable to the vast majority of black people.

Nothing says, "I'm not racist," like suggesting that black people are "slaves," because they could not possibly disagree with you for any other reason.

^ That right there; that's a Bingo

Kanye is only now "woke" because he licked Trump's ass. In reality, he probably just wanted some attention all around and he got it.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ That right there; that's a Bingo

Kanye is only now "woke" because he licked Trump's ass. In reality, he probably just wanted some attention all around and he got it.

So You support the "Unka Tom" Side of things Huh Robbie?

But then we all ready knew you were a Hypocrite.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Black people love when conservatives condescend to them using racially-charged expressions.

It is totally not offensive at all to suggest that black people cannot think for themselves, and are "on the plantation," whether it be social programs, the Democratic Party, or whatever other reason they attribute conservative values and the Republican Party being unpalatable to the vast majority of black people.

Nothing says, "I'm not racist," like suggesting that black people are "slaves," because they could not possibly disagree with you for any other reason.


Oh you mean like a bunch of leftists suggesting Kanye is in "the sunken place" hypnotized into servitude by the white people for voicing an opinion they disagree with?

I'm jokingly referring to it as a plantation because the left seems to think it is owed the allegiance of black people due to the presumption of some homogeneous collective racial interest, and the concept of an "uncle Tom" the "sunken place" comment as well as people telling Kanye that he's "betraying black people" and the arguments of "internalized racism" people use to dismiss the views of right-wing minorities all speak to this view that there is some collectivist racial interest that minorities should act within that just so happens to fall in line with democrat politics and that if they don't adhere to that line of thinking they are betraying their own race. They're acting like Kanye's some sort of race traitor for holding a different opinion.

And you can see a similar narrative going on with women, such as Hillary Clinton and the democrats' views that Hillary was owed the female vote, and Hillary saying that married women didn't vote for her because they became submissive to their husbands or some shit, and the argument of "internalized misogyny" used to dismiss the views of right-wing women or just women in general who don't buy into the claims of third wave feminists.

The expectation is that people are supposed to align with some perceived group interest of their demographic... unless it's white people, if a white person aligns themselves with "white racial interests" or "white solidarity" then they are immediately called out as racist bigots... which I mean fair enough, racial collectivism is ****ing stupid and reprehensible no matter who does it IMO. Though even arguing against the modern progressives will get you labeled alt-right, such as the mainstream media slandering Jordan Peterson as some alt-right figure, Sargon being accused repeatedly of being alt-right, Ben Shapiro being called alt-right, and I mean whatever you think of these people's intelligence or principles they are most certainly not alt-right.

I would personally never even think of or dare to tell some white person that they owe themselves to some sort of white racial interest or act like they're some race traitor if they turn left-wing.

So you clearly missed the purpose of my statement, I wasn't implying that black people who are left-wing can't think for themselves, because clearly there are people of every race on every part of the political spectrum that can. I was jokingly referring to it as a plantation as a reference to the social pressure and types of attitudes being espoused towards Kanye West in light of his most recent tweets, and the obvious fact that this issue isn't solely contained to Kanye.

Again, I wasn't calling it a plantation because there are black people who disagree with me politically, I was calling it a plantation because Kanye is being treated as some sort of race traitor for leaving it, and being told by the outrage mob and left-wing media that he needs to get back in line.

Kanye West is not a smart man.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ That right there; that's a Bingo

Kanye is only now "woke" because he licked Trump's ass. In reality, he probably just wanted some attention all around and he got it.

And if he'd come out and insulted Trump leftists would be licking his nutsack for him.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Oh you mean like a bunch of leftists suggesting Kanye is in "the sunken place" hypnotized into servitude by the white people for voicing an opinion they disagree with?

I'm jokingly referring to it as a plantation because the left seems to think it is owed the allegiance of black people due to the presumption of some homogeneous collective racial interest, and the concept of an "uncle Tom" the "sunken place" comment as well as people telling Kanye that he's "betraying black people" and the arguments of "internalized racism" people use to dismiss the views of right-wing minorities all speak to this view that there is some collectivist racial interest that minorities should act within that just so happens to fall in line with democrat politics and that if they don't adhere to that line of thinking they are betraying their own race. They're acting like Kanye's some sort of race traitor for holding a different opinion.

And you can see a similar narrative going on with women, such as Hillary Clinton and the democrats' views that Hillary was owed the female vote, and Hillary saying that married women didn't vote for her because they became submissive to their husbands or some shit, and the argument of "internalized misogyny" used to dismiss the views of right-wing women or just women in general who don't buy into the claims of third wave feminists.

That is how tribal politics function. The use of social media now is the tool to force individuals to submit to the "leaders" of the different tribes or their collectivism. The left has really embraced the social media tools to further their agenda more effectively then the right has imo.

Originally posted by Surtur
And if he'd come out and insulted Trump leftists would be licking his nutsack for him.

They'd probably still think he was a silly clown looking for attention, just as before Trump ran for president.

Originally posted by BackFire
Kanye West is not a smart man.

Are you INSINUATING that Black People aren't as Smart as White People?

Please report Yourself to Yourself for Making Racist Comments BF.

So there was that guy who got kicked out of a bar for wearing a MAGA hat and sued. The judge recently tossed the case. I agree as I don't think anyone is entitled to the labor of anyone else. The guy tried to argue it was religious discrimination because his MAGA hat is part of how he remembers 9/11 victims and the judge didn't buy it.

But why is discrimination based on political beliefs okay yet discrimination based on religious beliefs is not? I sort of get not wanting to allow discrimination against people based on things they cannot change like race, gender, or sexuality. However, you have a choice when it comes to what you want to believe in just as you have a choice in what your political beliefs are.

Originally posted by Robtard
They'd probably still think he was a silly clown looking for attention, just as before Trump ran for president.

Yeah. no.

Originally posted by Robtard
They'd probably still think he was a silly clown looking for attention, just as before Trump ran for president.

Lulz probably because the left would've just sat back and said oh that crazy Kenye West always so zany, have some candy and go sit back in the corner with crazy uncle eddy.

Versus him posting on the right and the vitriol and anger become palatable with "uncle tom" outrage and other crazy slanders.

Originally posted by Surtur
So there was that guy who got kicked out of a bar for wearing a MAGA hat and sued. The judge recently tossed the case. I agree as I don't think anyone is entitled to the labor of anyone else. The guy tried to argue it was religious discrimination because his MAGA hat is part of how he remembers 9/11 victims and the judge didn't buy it.

But why is discrimination based on political beliefs okay yet discrimination based on religious beliefs is not? I sort of get not wanting to allow discrimination against people based on things they cannot change like race, gender, or sexuality. However, you have a choice when it comes to what you want to believe in just as you have a choice in what your political beliefs are.

Legal discrimination based on religious beliefs is now a thing. The wedding cake issue and the various 'Religious Freedom Restoration' acts.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah. no.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Lulz probably because the left would've just sat back and said oh that crazy Kenye West always so zany, have some candy and go sit back in the corner with crazy uncle eddy.

Versus him posting on the right and the vitriol and anger become palatable with "uncle tom" outrage and other crazy slanders.

"The Left" has thought Kanye is a silly fool for a long time now. eg When he pulled his idiot's stunt with Taylor Swift (or whomever that was) and stealing her microphone to rant like a retard.

Originally posted by Robtard
Legal discrimination based on religious beliefs is now a thing. The wedding cake issue and the various 'Religious Freedom Restoration' acts.

I was not aware there had been a decision in the wedding cake case yet.

Originally posted by Robtard
"The Left" has thought Kanye is a silly fool for a long time now. eg When he pulled his idiot's stunt with Taylor Swift (or whomever that was) and stealing her microphone to rant like a retard.

They sure didn't think he was silly when he said George Bush didn't care about blacks.

But actually I do agree with you. If Kanye dissed Trump they'd still think he was a fool. Oh...they'd still lick his nutsack up and down, even on a hot day. But deep down their feelings about him would not have changed.

Originally posted by Surtur
They sure didn't think he was silly when he said George Bush didn't care about blacks.

But actually I do agree with you. If Kanye dissed Trump they'd still think he was a fool. Oh...they'd still lick his nutsack up and down, even on a hot day. But deep down their feelings about him would not have changed.

Yeah they did, cos it was Kanye just crying for attention.

Well no, you don't agree with me, as that's a narrative you've made; not me.

Originally posted by Surtur
I was not aware there had been a decision in the wedding cake case yet.

My error, thought that had gone through. Still see the Religious Freedom Restoration acts

Originally posted by Surtur
I was not aware there had been a decision in the wedding cake case yet.

It's scheduled to appear in front of the Supreme Court around June 21st. Where they will decide if the artistic expression can be forced on businesses/individuals.

Originally posted by snowdragon
It's scheduled to appear in front of the Supreme Court around June 21st. Where they will decide if the artistic expression can be forced on businesses/individuals.

Interesting that's the topic now, as the bakers had initially refused on religious grounds; not "it goes against the artist in me". How hilarious.