Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Not in this specific situation. It seems you're too busy tying equalization tactics to see clearly that it's one-sided here in regards to what Wolf said and how Trumpers reacted.

It's very clear what he was doing and why he was doing it to that man. It wasn't a "standard retard" thing or however Anne Coulter tried to apologetically spin it.

It's clear you can never accept when both sides are hypocrites. There always has to be that "Yeah but...the conservatives did it more".

That just won't fly.

And I posted video evidence. He was mocking him, but not for being disabled. This won't be debated.

I mean I don’t think she owes anyone an apology, I just think the whitehouse correspondents dinner is a big joke tbh and a place for all the leftie media elites to circle jerk each other to try and score points with their friends.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's clear you can never accept when both sides are hypocrites. There always has to be that "Yeah but...the conservatives did it more".

That just won't fly.

And I posted video evidence. He was mocking him, but not for being disabled. This won't be debated.

Weird thing for you to say here when you're the one using equalization tactics ie "but the Dems..." and I'm referring specifically to the Wolf situation only; that's all I'm talking about. Wolf did not attack Sander's looks; that's what is being claimed.

We already did this; it's clear what Trump was doing; he was mocking the man's specific disabilities with the odd hand gestures and whatnot. This isn't surprising as Trump's not someone who is above this behavior.

Originally posted by Robtard
Weird thing for you to say here when you're the one using equalization tactics ie "but the Dems..." and I'm referring specifically to the Wolf situation only; that's all I'm talking about. Wolf did not attack Sander's looks; that's what is being claimed.

We already did this; it's clear what Trump was doing; he was mocking the man's specific disabilities with the odd hand gestures and whatnot. This isn't surprising as Trump's not someone who is above this behavior.

Lol I never said conservatives weren't being hypocrites. I'm just noting Dems were too. It won't be debated.

And again, it's clear Trump uses the gesture to mock PLENTY of people. There is video evidence. You're done.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean I don’t think she owes anyone an apology, I just think the whitehouse correspondents dinner is a big joke tbh and a place for all the leftie media elites to circle jerk each other to try and score points with their friends.

I don't either, but what I love is: The people running the dinner themselves distanced themselves from her. Planned Parenthood has said her abortion joke went too far.

I love seeing these people cannibalize each other.

And I agree with Crowder in that you shouldn't roast someone you HATE.

These dinners are supposed to be fun events with some light roasting. That would not have happened at this dinner. Storm Daniels lawyer actually said Trump not showing up was an affront to free speech. These people are lunatics.

Yes, "Dems were too" is the equalization tactics you're using to try and make the Trumpers who are spinning the Wolf matter seem less shitty. Rather silly, imo. Why not just deal with the matter at hand as it is.

Incorrect still. You're doing that thing again where you try and turn the friendly convo into a shitfest as a means to not face that you're incorrect.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, "Dems were too" is the equalization tactics you're using to try and make the Trumpers who are spinning the Wolf matter seem less shitty. Rather silly, imo. Why not just deal with the matter at hand as it is.

Incorrect still. You're doing that thing again where you try and turn the friendly convo into a shitfest as a means to not face that you're incorrect.

Yes yes in your mind you can't stand how shitty or hypocritical your own side is but dude I don't care. Accept it or don't.

And you ignore video evidence, there is no debating that.

Wait... when the **** is any conversation you two have a friendly conversation? KEK

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Wait... when the **** is any conversation you two have a friendly conversation? KEK

Look at the past few post up until recently. Rather friendly, no real insults or assholish behavior on either of our parts. Then Surt got ugly. Oh well.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Wait... when the **** is any conversation you two have a friendly conversation? KEK

I think he means the friendly convos of OTHER ppl. 😛

School district apparently first in state to let some teachers, staff members carry guns on campus

Well good for them. I hope they never have to contribute to the hundreds of thousands of defensive gun usages each year.

So many lives saved, but you don't want them ever to have to take that step, you know?

Better than a bucket of ****ing rocks kek

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Better than a bucket of ****ing rocks kek

Or this:

Pennsylvania school district arms teachers with small baseball bats as 'last resort'

Lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
The problem for me is the lack of consistency. Trump insults the looks of a woman? Misogyny! Trumps own looks are insulted? Meh, Trump did it first!

Is it misandry when a female makes fun of his looks?

And they lie about the disabled reporter thing. Look at how he acts:

YouTube video

It's a gesture he uses on many. He mocked a disabled person, he didn't mock their disability.

And when you have video evidence like this and people still ignore it...what is to be done?

Oh, wow. That's fairly dishonest of them to try and spin that. Man, they will go to any length to disparage Trump as dishonestly as possible, won't they? He really really resulted their jimmies.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, wow. That's fairly dishonest of them to try and spin that. Man, they will go to any length to disparage Trump as dishonestly as possible, won't they? He really really resulted their jimmies.

Yep. And they STILL try to argue it lol. Even after video evidence.

They don't want to accept that opposed to Trump mocking someone for being disabled...he's just an a-ahole all around lol.

Snopes and California’s Totalitarian Left

At this point Snopes isn't to be trusted.

"The anti-“conversion therapy” bill sponsored by San Jose Democrat Assemblyman Evan Low basically forbids provision of counseling, books, advice, referrals, etc. aimed at helping someone overcome same-sex desires or transgender identification. In other words, it criminalizes the sexual morality code of every major religion and especially Christianity – the real target. It should chill every freedom-loving American that this spectacular violation of the First Amendment passed the California House by a vote of 50 to 18 on April 19 and is now before the state Senate.

Snopes focused on a response by Republican Assembly member Travis Allen to One America News Network’s Liz Wheeler, who asked, “…if this bill were to pass, would this prohibit the sale of the Bible, that teaches these things about sexual morality?”

Mr. Allen replied, “Well, literally, according to how this law is written, yes, it would. This is, you know, PC culture, politically correct culture, gone horribly awry.”
CARTOONS | Jerry Holbert
View Cartoon

Snopes smugly informs us that, “California Assembly Bill 2943 does not mention the Bible, Christianity, or religion at all, so when Allen claimed that the legislation would ‘literally’ prohibit the sale of the Bible, he was stating something that is demonstrably and clearly false.”

Really?

In a brilliant takedown in The Federalist, author and academic Robert Gagnon explains why Snopes – not Mr. Allen – is dead wrong.

“That the bill doesn’t explicitly mention these things is irrelevant if the wording of the bill is broad enough to encompass them,” Dr. Gagnon writes. “Sure, it is virtually impossible that California will immediately attempt to ban the sale of the Bible itself. Not even the hard Left in California has that kind of chutzpah. But citations of Bible verses in the context of declaring homosexual practice and transgenderism to be morally debased could indeed get one into serious trouble with the law if it comes in the context of selling or advertising a product or service….

“Snopes,” he continues, “heavily shades the truth: ‘What is clear is that Low’s bill does not seek to outlaw all religious or moral instruction regarding sexuality and sexual orientation.’"

Appearantly, Snoop Dogg cousin ask the Crips to **** Kanye West up because he defended Thrump!

****ing love this country!

Originally posted by SquallX
Appearantly, Snoop Dogg cousin ask the Crips to **** Kanye West up because he defended Thrump!

****ing love this country!

Has to be done bro, has to be done. This negro escaped the plantation and got a taste of life outside of it. He then didn't even back down when people tried to shame him into returning to the plantation. He seems particularly adept at seeing when people are trying to manipulate him into going back.

Literally can't think of any other valid option at this point besides the Crips.

On the plus side: he's f*cking trolling liberals spectacularly now.

Kanye West compares himself to Harriet Tubman, Nat Turner following slavery remarks

LMFAO

There are rumors Trump is gonna invite him to dinner at the WH. That would be hilarious.

It’s official, Kanye is straight up trolling now.