Originally posted by Surtur
So someone from Stanford Medical School put out this in April:The cognitive differences between men and women
I would have expected the liberals of California to show up with torches and pitchforks over this.
it's a lengthy read. could you perhaps quote the part that we're supposed to be #triggered over?
Every time I see black people who think that all white people should beg forgiveness for slavery, it triggers me because my ancestors fought and died to give them equal rights and I never get any thanks for the work my ancestors did.
But then I remember that I'm not actually triggered because I don't deserve any thanks for things I didn't do. I only deserve thanks for things I did. 🙂
Yikes, who knew people would get triggered over an article from Stanford medicine and a joke about the intolerance of liberals?
Well I guess I knew 😄
The title is truly fitting, I love seeing them get so angry over a story being posted and then pretending like the one who posted it is the one with the issues. Love it.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Every time I see black people who think that all white people should beg forgiveness for slavery, it triggers me because my ancestors fought and died to give them equal rights and I never get any thanks for the work my ancestors did.But then I remember that I'm not actually triggered because I don't deserve any thanks for things I didn't do. I only deserve thanks for things I did. 🙂
It is always amusing to see the people who didn't suffer the injustice whining at the people who didn't commit the injustice, isn't it?
Also shhh ignore the fact that there were black slave owners. It's not like once you owned a slave you had the ability to free him, right? I have always wondered what the blacks who say they want reparations would say if this was pointed out to them. It would be tough work to track down the blacks related to the black slave owners and then to force them to pay reparations.
Now I know this will no doubt trigger some:
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
Originally posted by Surtur
Yikes, who knew people would get triggered over an article from Stanford medicine and a joke about the intolerance of liberals?Well I guess I knew 😄
The title is truly fitting, I love seeing them get so angry over a story being posted and then pretending like the one who posted it is the one with the issues. Love it.
^
Nope, this guy's not #triggered. Not #triggered even a little bit
Originally posted by Surtur
Yikes, who knew people would get triggered over an article from Stanford medicine and a joke about the intolerance of liberals?Well I guess I knew 😄
The title is truly fitting, I love seeing them get so angry over a story being posted and then pretending like the one who posted it is the one with the issues. Love it.
oh okay, so you didn't read it either. what a gyp.
oh well, have fun pretending that you ruined everyone's morning with your link. was hoping for an explanation of what it's about. i can see it concerns neurological differences between the sexes. is that the big a-bomb that's supposed to blow our hair back and blind us with rage?
Originally posted by Robtard
^
Nope, this guy's not #triggered. Not #triggered even a little bit
It's okay Rob, if you say it enough times it might become true.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh okay, so you didn't read it either. what a gyp.oh well, have fun pretending that you ruined everyone's morning with your link. was hoping for an explanation of what it's about. i can see it concerns neurological differences between the sexes. is that the big a-bomb that's supposed to blow our hair back and blind us with rage?
Man not only are you triggered, but you got even more triggered by the fact someone said this triggered you, lol.
Also, if you really need your hand held with this I will give you some stuff from it:
"But over the past 15 years or so, there’s been a sea change as new technologies have generated a growing pile of evidence that there are inherent differences in how men’s and women’s brains are wired and how they work.
Not how well they work, mind you. Our differences don’t mean one sex or the other is better or smarter or more deserving. Some researchers have grappled with charges of “neuro_sexism”: falling prey to stereotypes or being too quick to interpret human sex differences as biological rather than cultural. They counter, however, that data from animal research, cross-​cultural surveys, natural experiments and brain-imaging studies demonstrate real, if not always earthshaking, brain differences, and that these differences may contribute to differences in behavior and cognition."
And one more part you might find interesting:
"In her preface to the first edition, Halpern wrote: “At the time, it seemed clear to me that any between-sex differences in thinking abilities were due to socialization practices, artifacts and mistakes in the research, and bias and prejudice. ... After reviewing a pile of journal articles that stood several feet high and numerous books and book chapters that dwarfed the stack of journal articles … I changed my mind.”
Why? There was too much data pointing to the biological basis of sex-based cognitive differences to ignore, Halpern says. For one thing, the animal-research findings resonated with sex-based differences ascribed to people. These findings continue to accrue. In a study of 34 rhesus monkeys, for example, males strongly preferred toys with wheels over plush toys, whereas females found plush toys likable. It would be tough to argue that the monkeys’ parents bought them sex-typed toys or that simian society encourages its male offspring to play more with trucks. A much more recent study established that boys and girls 9 to 17 months old — an age when children show few if any signs of recognizing either their own or other children’s sex — nonetheless show marked differences in their preference for stereotypically male versus stereotypically female toys."
You're welcome.
Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, aside from being a somewhat cool and fascinating read, what exactly should people be #triggered over concerning that males and females are indeed neurologically different? Can you address that?
I thought it was obvious, the transgender issue. They fight against any science of this sort.
For example...
Not sure why the above link isn't working, but here:
Interesting, it still goes to the 404, I wonder why.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/08/liberals-are-for-science-until-theyre-not.php
That has a link to the original article that works, not sure what is up.
Originally posted by Robtard
They do? Because that article kind of supports that people can be born with one type of body and have a non-matching (at least in societies terms) brain/mind. eg Male body with a mind composed of female neurological tendencies and aspects.ps you link is a "You Have Reached a 404 Page"
You're welcome
Lol wait, did you just say it supports transgenderism?
Originally posted by Robtard
Well anyhow, not sure what was supposed to trigger people in that article. Decent read overall though. So thanks I guess.Can you not read what I said?
They get triggered at stuff like that. The other article is from Slate and the title says it all. They seem to want to deny science when it conflicts with their feelings.
I realize it's not even rational for them to get upset over this, but some do.
Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, aside from being a somewhat cool and fascinating read, what exactly should people be #triggered over concerning that males and females are indeed neurologically different? Can you address that?