Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol except again: I posted it in the context of being surprised people didn't get upset over it. I never claimed it proved anything.

Did you want to try again? Feel free to have another shot. Because you're proving my point by getting triggered.

You do realize that just because the paged flipped, your posts did not disappear, right?

Originally posted by Surtur

[QUOTE=16288963]Originally posted by Robtard

Originally posted by Surtur

[QUOTE=16288954]Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, aside from being a somewhat cool and fascinating read, what exactly should people be #triggered over concerning that males and females are indeed neurologically different? Can you address that?

I thought it was obvious, the transgender issue. They fight against any science of this sort.

They do? Because that article kind of supports that people can be born with one type of body and have a non-matching (at least in societies terms) brain/mind. eg Male body with a mind composed of female neurological tendencies and aspects.[/QUOTE]

Lol wait, did you just say it supports transgenderism? [/QUOTE]

Originally posted by Surtur

[QUOTE=16288968]Originally posted by Robtard
Well anyhow, not sure what was supposed to trigger people in that article. Decent read overall though. So thanks I guess.

They get triggered at stuff like that. The other article is from Slate and the title says it all. They seem to want to deny science when it conflicts with their feelings.

I realize it's not even rational for them to get upset over this, but some do. [/QUOTE]

To summarize: you read an article, and thought it contradicts something it does not; and because of this, you thought people would be triggered by it, so you posted it.

The problem for you, is that it does not prove what you think it does. Hence, why no one was triggered by it, and why you look like a fool for thinking they would be.

Would you like a redo?

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't pick the name change, it was a mod. I had asked for a different one, but oh well. Not my problem.

Imo you've reduced yourself to random link-pasting to get attention.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol dude look at all of you getting triggered over the mere fact I posted an article and expressed surprise that the crazed liberals didn't get upset over it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly, it seems you're posting stories which #trigger you (and that's fine/on topic) and just insisting that other people are mad at the stories.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You do realize that just because the paged flipped, your posts did not disappear, right?

[B]I thought it was obvious, the transgender issue. They fight against any science of this sort.

They do? Because that article kind of supports that people can be born with one type of body and have a non-matching (at least in societies terms) brain/mind. eg Male body with a mind composed of female neurological tendencies and aspects.[/QUOTE]

Lol wait, did you just say it supports transgenderism? [/QUOTE]

They get triggered at stuff like that. The other article is from Slate and the title says it all. They seem to want to deny science when it conflicts with their feelings.

I realize it's not even rational for them to get upset over this, but some do. [/QUOTE]

To summarize: you read an article, and thought it contradicts something it does not; and because of this, you thought people would be triggered by it, so you posted it.

The problem for you, is that it does not prove what you think it does. Hence, why no one was triggered by it, and why you look like a fool for thinking they would be.

Would you like a redo? [/B][/QUOTE]

Lol, you keep proving my point with your responses. You quoted me several times talking about how I think people would freak out over this. I never once said the article was correct. I did ask Rob if he though it proved transgenderism, but that isn't me saying it is right or wrong.

So to summarize: I never once said this proved anything, I read an article and thought it was something that would trigger sensitive leftists and here you are. 👆

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Didn't you want to call it 'News that trigger the left' or something? How is that going to trigger the libs?

Imo you've reduced yourself to random link-pasting to get attention.

I said that because he seemed intent on having the word trigger in there.

IMO you're just whining for no reason. You've seen threads like this before where I post stuff. Sometimes others post too or they respond to the articles.

You know all this, you know what to expect, so why are you still complaining over it? What is the post? Just to come and insult me? Okay, good job.

It's just baffling at all the people getting triggered over this thread.

Originally posted by Surtur
I said that because he seemed intent on having the word trigger in there.

IMO you're just whining for no reason. You've seen threads like this before where I post stuff. Sometimes others post too or they respond to the articles.

You know all this, you know what to expect, so why are you still complaining over it? What is the post? Just to come and insult me? Okay, good job.

It's just baffling at all the people getting triggered over this thread.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
How am I complaining? I didn't even tell you to stop doing it lol. You should learn to use words.

Fair enough, you didn't specifically complain so apologies, but I just don't get the point though of you and the others in this topic. You come in and say I want attention or whatever else and that is fine, but we've done this dance 1,000 times. Not just you, Rob, Bash, whoever happens to be floating around.

Some article I post will either be nitpicked to death or if they can't find anything to nitpick they'll just turn to "you're triggered". It's fine if people want to do that(most of us have used the trigger word), but it's going to have zero effect on me.

Anyways so moving on:

Venezuela’s socialist leader offers olive branch to Trump while bashing him

Kind of bizarre, but it would be interesting to be a fly on the wall if they end up having this "personal" meeting.

I'll post one more before I go. This is an online guide about microaggressions from a private university in New York.

Microaggression

They have helpful things you can click and it will tell you the various ways you can microaggression. I clicked "Microaggression may involve the following" and it gave a list. Some of them do make sense, but other stuff...well "invisibility" is on there. I don't even know what they mean. Does it mean ignoring a person is a microaggression?

There is also "cultural insensitivity" which is vague enough that it could be anything. It later on says:

"Microaggression which is systemic, institutionalized, and/or experienced through the physical environmental

Examples

Being forced to use the complicated industrial elevator and take an extra ten minutes to arrive in class, because you are disabled and use a motorized wheelchair.

The majority of readings on all your class syllabi feature only readings from white cisgender men. Professors who try to bring in more variation are criticized by their department chairs.

Monuments, artwork, or portraiture in public spaces that are predominantly (often exclusively) white cisgender men and women."

Lol..so just to be clear, the monuments with white men on them are microaggressions as well.

😆

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, you keep proving my point with your responses. You quoted me several times talking about how I think people would freak out over this. I never once said the article was correct. I did ask Rob if he though it proved transgenderism, but that isn't me saying it is right or wrong.

So to summarize: I never once said this proved anything, I read an article and thought it was something that would trigger sensitive leftists and here you are. 👆

No, I quoted the chain of conversation in which you state unambiguously that you think the article delegitimizes transgender identities. It is the reason you cite for thinking it would be triggering, and your stated reason for posting it.

When it was pointed out that the article does not in fact delegitimize transgender identities, you attempted to change your argument to "I did not say it proved it."

Well, no one said you did.

Here is a simple thought experiment: If the article does not delegitimize transgender identities, then why would those who support trans people be triggered by it?

The answer is that they would not be.

So the only way you would think this would be triggering to "sensitive leftists" is if you thought it proved something it does not, your attempt to squirm away from that embarrassingly wrong position by stating "I never said it proved it," not withstanding.

Nevermind how deeply revealing this entire spectacle is about you. You are so triggered by transgender people that you read an article unrelated to transgender issues, made a connection to transgender people, and rushed to post it without fully understanding it, because you thought you had ammunition you could use against them, and all you did is wind up shooting yourself in the face.

"Herp derp, I iz smart!1"

Which is really the odd thing here, of all the groups of people to hate on and show nothing but disdain for, the Transgendered is a weird choice.

Telling you, there's some history behind it. Like a The Kinks "Lola" kind of history. First she broke his butthole and then his heart.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, I quoted the chain of conversation in which you state unambiguously that you think the article delegitimizes transgender identities. It is the reason you cite for thinking it would be triggering, and your stated reason for posting it.

When it was pointed out that the article does not in fact delegitimize transgender identities, you attempted to change your argument to "I did not say it proved it."

Well, no one said you did.

Here is a simple thought experiment: If the article does not delegitimize transgender identities, then why would those who support trans people be triggered by it?

The answer is that they would not be.

So the only way you would think this would be triggering to "sensitive leftists" is if you thought it proved something it does not, your attempt to squirm away from that embarrassingly wrong position by stating "I never said it proved it," not withstanding.

Nevermind how deeply revealing this entire spectacle is about you. You are so triggered by transgender people that you read an article unrelated to transgender issues, made a connection to transgender people, and rushed to post it without fully understanding it, because you thought you had ammunition you could use against them, and all you did is wind up shooting yourself in the face.

"Herp derp, I iz smart!1"

Nice novel, but nope, saying the only way I think it would trigger them is if I thought it proved something is false. I have said before: these folk aren't rational. It doesn't have to prove something, because leftists aren't rational about these matters.

Feel free to get even more triggered and type another novel. No doubt Rob or something else will pat you on the back for it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Which is really the odd thing here, of all the groups of people to hate on and show nothing but disdain for, the Transgendered is a weird choice.

Telling you, there's some history behind it. Like a The Kinks "Lola" kind of history. First she broke his butthole and then his heart.

I do not hate them, but the transgender shit is now being shoved down our throats. We are said to be bad people if we do not play along with the delusions of the mentally ill. Our country is a joke. We have transgender 4 year olds.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nice novel, but nope, saying the only way I think it would trigger them is if I thought it proved something is false. I have said before: these folk aren't rational. It doesn't have to prove something, because leftists aren't rational about these matters.

Feel free to get even more triggered and type another novel. No doubt Rob or something else will pat you on the back for it.

#AngryConcessions

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#AngryConcessions

Replies like this are pretty much all you have left. It is hilarious. You can't stay away from this topic lol. You legitimately can't help yourself. That is the Trump Derangement Syndrome working its way through you.

I propose a new (and IMO much more descriptively accurate) title for this thread:

Surtur vs The Left Leaning Masses of KMC

no no, i get it. his post passed some character limit that you arbitrarily predesignated, so you win because he's #triggered. but that's really only occuring inside your brain. in actually you basically rolled over and showed your belly...while snarling and snapping ineffectually...oh dear i hope i didn't pass the character limit.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I propose a new (and IMO much more descriptively accurate) title for this thread:

Surtur vs The Left Leaning Masses of KMC

Lol, this actually kinda fits. Pretty much everything I say is going to have people descending upon it.

I will continue to post articles, they will continue to constantly read them and reply and yet call me a loser or other things, lol. I guess it's like when you have a bug zapper and the bugs just can't help flying into it. Even after they see other bugs dying from it, they cannot stop themselves.

You know this old saying... it takes two to tango. You seem a more than willing participant in this dynamic.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
You know this old saying... it takes two to tango. You seem a more than willing participant in this dynamic.

Oh I 100% am lol. I'm a dick, I admit it. But they continually come at me and yet keep on reading the posts, getting triggered, and refusing to ever admit their behavior.

So it's almost like the dickishness is negated, lol.