Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Speaking of which... here's a whopper:

"Why can't we hate men?" by the Washington Post

[b]Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.

So, in this moment, here in the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity, is it really so illogical to hate men?

But we’re not supposed to hate them because . . . #NotAllMen. I love Michelle Obama as much as the next woman, but when they have gone low for all of human history, maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts.

We are told he’s with us and #NotHim. But, truly, if he were with us, wouldn’t this all have ended a long time ago? If he really were with us, wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

So basically she's saying **** all men, it's okay to blanket hate all men based on some presumption of collective guilt, she says women have every right to hate all men, and that the only thing men can do to repent for their sin of how they were born is to become subservient to women... and even then she'll still treat you like second class human beings.

The author of this article is Suzanna Danuta Walters who is... you guessed it... a professor of sociology at Northeastern University in Boston. Oh no, but that's not where it ends, she's also the director of the Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at this University. [/B]

Just wow lol. I looked up her picture. Somehow I knew she'd have short hair...

https://www.northeastern.edu/cssh/people/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2013/08/SOCANT-Walters-web.jpg

It's also funny that she is a professor. How can the school expect her to grade her male students fairly now?

Wait there is even more comedy. I was reading the comments and the rules for commenting on WaPo and you have this:

"We don’t allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, political beliefs, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classifications."

Lol. Pure gold. This is literally rules for thee but not for me.

fragile

adjective

a: easily broken or destroyed *a fragile vase * fragile bones
b:constitutionally (see constitutionally 1a) delicate: lacking in vigor * a fragile child

Originally posted by Emperordmb
More importantly notice how they don't denounce this shit.

Like I want them to denounce it not as some bullshit gotcha moment, if they denounce it I'm not gonna throw it at them like "HAHA THIS IS YOUR SIDE THIS REPRESENTS YOU SOMEHOW." On the contrary, if they denounced the SJW and marxist shit in harsher terms, they would make a clear point that it is not in line with their own stances... yet they won't do it for some reason. They act like all of this shit is normal and us finding it appalling is what's weird.

imagine being this desperate for validation, crumbs 🙁

I mean if you don’t want to dissociate yourself from obvious horseshit and instead come across as an apologist for it, that’s on you man.

I don't think Beni's ever openly and explicitly denounced setting people on fire and then rolling them down a hill, ergo, Beni MUST be for that.

👆

Imagine believing that not spending your days back to back posting your OUTRAGE over those damn dirty leftists means your a feminazi, commie etc. 😐

I don't agree with that article btw, she comes off as too angry and too finger-pointy, I get her message, about men doing more to push for equality, but she loses it with the rage. The point of an article like that is to sway people to your cause and/or plight, she's not, so she failed there. But I'm also not fuming over it like some people, if anything, it was mildly amusing.

But on that note, DMB, why aren't you denouncing Surt's equally pitiful limp-wristed attack? Making it out that an angry extreme feminist must have short hair or some nonsense? That her looks dictate her viewpoints. Well?

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think Beni's ever openly and explicitly denounced setting people on fire and then rolling them down a hill, ergo, Beni MUST be for that.

If you asked someone about it though, repeatedly, I wouldn’t expect someone to weasel out of saying they obviously disapprove.

I mean AdamPOE defended Antifa and the SPLC ffs

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't agree with that article btw, she comes off as too angry and too finger-pointy, I get her message, about men doing more to push for equality, but she loses it with the rage. The point of an article like that is to sway people to your cause and/or plight, she's not, so she failed there. But I'm also not fuming over it like some people, if anything, it was mildly amusing.

But on that note, DMB, why aren't you denouncing Surt's equally pitiful limp-wristed attack? Making it out that an angry extreme feminist must have short hair or some nonsense? That her looks dictate her viewpoints. Well?


This probably deserves a response long enough that it’d be annoying to type up on my phone.

I’ll give a proper response when I’m back on my computer.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If you asked someone about it though, repeatedly, I wouldn’t expect someone to weasel out of saying they obviously disapprove.

I mean AdamPOE defended Antifa and the SPLC ffs

I don't think Adam's ever defended the violent black mask wearers, if that's what you're getting at. What's your beef with the SPLC though? Admittedly, I don't know a whole lot about them.

One thing Adam didn't do though, is try to defend actual Neo-Nazis with whataboutry deflection tactics like some mini-me Hannity.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't agree with that article btw, she comes off as too angry and too finger-pointy, I get her message, about men doing more to push for equality, but she loses it with the rage. The point of an article like that is to sway people to your cause and/or plight, she's not, so she failed there. But I'm also not fuming over it like some people, if anything, it was mildly amusing.

But on that note, DMB, why aren't you denouncing Surt's equally pitiful limp-wristed attack? Making it out that an angry extreme feminist must have short hair or some nonsense? That her looks dictate her viewpoints. Well?

LMAO! This weasel...too funny.

And as for looks dictating views, nah...I just wasn't shocked she had short hair. Didn't surprise me. Doesn't mean I think all short haired women are whiny kunts like her.

Do better.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think Adam's ever defended the violent black mask wearers, if that's what you're getting at. What's your beef with the SPLC though? Admittedly, I don't know a whole lot about them.

One thing Adam didn't do though, is try to defend actual Neo-Nazis with whataboutry deflection tactics like some mini-me Hannity.

Nah, Adam is more like a mini-me Rachel Maddow probably.

Originally posted by Surtur
LMAO! This weasel...too funny.

And as for looks dictating views, nah...I just wasn't shocked she had short hair. Didn't surprise me. Doesn't mean I think all short haired women are whiny kunts like her.

Do better.

^ Wow

Anyways: props to Italy. Another boat full of rescued migrants tried to dock at one of their ports. Over 600 people on board. Keep in mind Italy had TOLD them this would happen. They didn't listen. Italy tried to get Malta to take them, but they said "F*ck no". Spain eventually agreed, and then Malta was all "oh well, we'll give you some supplies for your journey then!" and Italy was all "that's legit, this will be what we do for every ship that tries this".

Of course there were some scoldings:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44452760

But Italy is now run by populists and IMO immigration played a big role in that happening. I wonder how Spain will look 2-3 years down the line?

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Wow

Wow what? Your bullshit tactic didn't work.

Btw, I think there are a lot of fat radical feminists too. And a lot with short blue hair.

Now Rob: this doesn't mean all fatties are radical feminists. Definitely doesn't mean all people with blue hair are.

But you do see some leftists assume all hicks are Trumpers or all gun lovers are Trumpers, etc. etc.

Seattle to reverse and repeal new head tax after Amazon pressures city leaders

"Council member Lorena Gonzalez said she was “deeply troubled and disappointed by the political tactics” used by some of the powerful companies that “seem to prioritize corporations over people.”

Yeah no shit lady.

Italy is Far-Right, or quickly becoming that way.

Poll: Most Americans favor the death penalty

Interesting but...I still can't help feeling polls aren't to be trusted.

Tee hee: