Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Robtard922 pages
Originally posted by dadudemon
I appreciate what point they are making with this video but the most important part of this video is the fact that the news lady is looking thicccc!

I watched the video with sound off, skipping ahead just because you said that and indeed, she is 🙂

In actual triggering news and not another Tim 'Closet Trumper' Pool whining about imagined nonsense, seems a 7 year old immigrant died while in custody of dehydration. Did they run out of water over at the detention centers?

7-Year-Old Migrant Girl Dies Of Dehydration And Shock In U.S. Border Patrol Custody

A 7-year-old Guatemalan girl who crossed the southern border into the United States illegally earlier this month died of dehydration and shock after being apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol in New Mexico.

The girl and her father were part of a group of 163 people who surrendered to Border Patrol officers on the night of Dec. 6, south of Lordsburg, N.M., according to the The Washington Post, which first reported the story. -snip

yes. These people trying to INVADE The U.S need to be stopped. They are getting Children Killed.

Originally posted by quanchi112
True conservatives would never embrace trump.

Originally posted by dadudemon
While this is the No Scotsman logical fallacy, I agree.

A genuine American Conservative, also known as a classical liberal (yes, this is a legit thing in political science when labeling American Conservatives), would despise Trump, Obama, and Bush Jr. for their terrible violations of freedom.


Originally posted by Surtur
Sounds like no true liberal would cuck for Obama either then...

Eh depends what type of person it is. If it's someone who would just not support or vote for anyone who isn't a good reflection of their principles yes. But if it's someone who will pick the one of two options that is less bad then them supporting someone who doesn't embody their principles makes more sense

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Eh depends what type of person it is. If it's someone who would just not support or vote for anyone who isn't a good reflection of their principles yes. But if it's someone who will pick the one of two options that is less bad then them supporting someone who doesn't embody their principles makes more sense

thumbs_up

Originally posted by Robtard
I watched the video with sound off, skipping ahead just because you said that and indeed, she is 🙂

😖hifty:

Originally posted by Robtard
In actual triggering news and not another Tim 'Closet Trumper' Pool whining about imagined nonsense, seems a 7 year old immigrant died while in custody of dehydration. Did they run out of water over at the detention centers?

7-Year-Old Migrant Girl Dies Of Dehydration And Shock In U.S. Border Patrol Custody

A 7-year-old Guatemalan girl who crossed the southern border into the United States illegally earlier this month died of dehydration and shock after being apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol in New Mexico.

The girl and her father were part of a group of 163 people who surrendered to Border Patrol officers on the night of Dec. 6, south of Lordsburg, N.M., according to the The Washington Post, which first reported the story. -snip

Read about this, this morning. Very sad.

Unfortunately, there are too many humans in the world but sometimes, I wish to save them all. I don't want terrible things like this happening to kids.

Originally posted by quanchi112
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/michael-cohen-talks-george-stephanopoulos-transcript/story?id=59816305

His own personal attorney. Trump is so corrupt it should drive people to despise the liar.

Trumpers will double down on Trump. Watch.

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers will double down on Trump. Watch.

Haven't they already been doing that since the beginning?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Haven't they already been doing that since the beginning?

Yes they have and it's still amazing to watch. They seem to run on one basic truth to them, "Orange man good!" and that's all they need.

I'm just waiting for proof to come out that Trump not only knew about the Russia meeting in his own building, but was the one to approve of it. Which is obvious he did and did.

Originally posted by Robtard
In actual triggering news and not another Tim 'Closet Trumper' Pool

^Still too stupid to properly identify actual Trumpers. Moving on.

An interesting read:

Checking Robert Mueller

Originally posted by Surtur
An interesting read:

Checking Robert Mueller

Do share your most favorite points and give your overall opinion of that article.

Pretty Please?

Originally posted by Surtur
^Still too stupid to properly identify actual Trumpers. Moving on.

^ So much anger and rage in that post. Lolz.

Regardless of what side you are on, an unchecked executive authority with basically no boss is not democratic.

Let's all be adults, Democrats would not stand for this if Mueller was investigating Obama.

Originally posted by Surtur
^Still too stupid to properly identify actual Trumpers. Moving on.

That's what bugs me more than anything else about Robtard.

I like the guy for the most part, unlike some of the other people on here you can have a reasonable conversation with him if you approach him in the right way and if he doesn't have bad blood with you.

But still I'm really not a fan of the mindreading.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Do share your most favorite points and give your overall opinion that that article.

Pretty Please?

Overall it was an interesting article. My favorite part was when it delved a bit into the background of the judge involved.

"They have come to light thanks to a man who knows well how men like Messrs. Mueller and Comey operate: Judge Sullivan. He sits on the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, and as he wrote for the Journal last year, he got a “wake-up call” in 2008 while overseeing the trial of then-Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska. Judge Sullivan ultimately assigned a lawyer to investigate Justice Department misconduct.

The investigator’s report found prosecutors had engaged in deliberate and repeated ethical violations, withholding key evidence from the defense. It also excoriated the FBI for failing to write up 302s and for omitting key facts from those it did write. The head of the FBI was Mr. Mueller."

Originally posted by Emperordmb
That's what bugs me more than anything else about Robtard.

I like the guy for the most part, unlike some of the other people on here you can have a reasonable conversation with him if you approach him in the right way and if he doesn't have bad blood with you.

But still I'm really not a fan of the mindreading.

He's the same person who thinks the Daily Wire is alt right lol. Tim Pool definitely isn't a Trumper. Hell he didn't even vote for Trump.

Originally posted by Surtur
Overall it was an interesting article. My favorite part was when it delved a bit into the background of the judge involved.

[b]"They have come to light thanks to a man who knows well how men like Messrs. Mueller and Comey operate: Judge Sullivan. He sits on the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, and as he wrote for the Journal last year, he got a “wake-up call” in 2008 while overseeing the trial of then-Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska. Judge Sullivan ultimately assigned a lawyer to investigate Justice Department misconduct.

The investigator’s report found prosecutors had engaged in deliberate and repeated ethical violations, withholding key evidence from the defense. It also excoriated the FBI for failing to write up 302s and for omitting key facts from those it did write. The head of the FBI was Mr. Mueller." [/B]

It could be my ADHD mind but it feels a bit contrived to try and have gotcha against Mueller because of those things. Those were the items that stood out the most to me, as well.

But I'm not feeling it.

Help me get to the lightbulb: why are those things a big deal rather than just a nitpicky thing about Mueller and his teams in previous positions?

I think people could have similar criticisms of my work. I just sent out a survey on a massive project and quite a bit of criticism about communication of technical details was there - but almost none of those people have any business being in the weeds on that project but the think they do.

Know what I'm getting at?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Do share your most favorite points and give your overall opinion that that article.

Pretty Please?

I love stories that show Mueller is being checked and doesn't really have the carte' blanche free reign to do whatever he wants as Trump and the Trumpsphere love to claim while frantically screaming "Witch Hunt!".

That story and the others posted here showing Mueller is being checked (iirc, Judge T.S. Ellis was another putting Mueller in check) will only further cement that whatever Mueller's report ends up reveling is true; because there were checks and balances along the way despite the anti-Mueller crowd's protest.

And I fully admit that I laugh at Trumpers when they gleefully post these stories of some sort personal wins.